User talk:Aaron5572

August 2007[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Kazakhstan, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Spigot Map 05:02, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

2009 IndyCar series[edit]

Do you think you might like to use the Show preview button instead of saving the page with each minor tweak? --Falcadore (talk) 02:19, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2010 IndyCar Series season[edit]

Verifiability of information is a cornerstone of Wikipedia, and as such, we can't put information based on unconfirmed rumors in articles. Please stop editing 2010 IndyCar Series season to insert team and driver information without confirmation. It is not appropriate to do so until it is confirmed by the team or major news outlets. When and if it is, the changes can be made and an appropriate cite added. Do not make further changes without reliable sources. Thanks! EeepEeep (talk) 03:52, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also, instead of repeatedly making the same edits and having them reverted, you should discuss them on the talk page. EeepEeep (talk) 21:09, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Warring[edit]

I suggest you have a chat with the editor you disagree with, before Wikipedia:Edit warring comes into effect. It's just the polite thing to do. Thank you for your time. --Falcadore (talk) 07:53, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

All I'm asking is for you to talk to the other editor concerned. --Falcadore (talk) 20:45, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

EepEep does have a point. Wikipedia guidelines suggest that driver announcements should be sourced, and that rumours even rumours sourced from reputable sources like major magazines are not good enough. Generally drivers should only be added when announced by the teams concerned. Wikipedia is not a news service, there is no race to put the very latest 'soft news'. When adding material to wikipedia it should be absolutely correct. Probably correct is not good enough. Waiting for the announcements is the prefered method. Thank you. --Falcadore (talk) 05:27, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That does not remove the fact you are supposed to provide sources. I didn't say you were wrong, I was asking you for proof, proof you seemed unable to provide. --Falcadore (talk) 21:18, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]