User talk:A Certain Lack of Grandeur

This user is in school.

This user is taking a wikibreak and may be away or inactive for varying periods of time.
Although they may occasionally be able to do some editing, messages left for them may not be replied to for a while.
They will be back on Wikipedia when school is over.

vn-5

This user talk page has been vandalized 5 times.

Welcome![edit]

Hello, MopSeeker, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Hoppeduppeanut (talk) 01:12, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Giacomo Puccini[edit]

I have reversed your addition of {{notable}} to Template:Giacomo Puccini.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 03:52, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to World War III may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

a feasibility test for a simultaneous launch of all 16 [[R-29RMU Sineva]] liquid-fueled missiles (which each carry four independently targetable re-entry vehicles ([[MIRVs]]) from a [[Delta Class

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:25, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 23[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Boeing B-47 Stratojet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Subsonic. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 02:31, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

List to Prose?[edit]

You tagged a few pages as better in prose (such as this one) but I don't have any idea why. Maybe you can tell me why you think they could be better (or even not-worse) in prose? tahc ^chat 18:54, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That was likely the result of an accident.MopSeeker (talk) 19:52, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Some baklava for you![edit]

Many thanks for the welcome. Hope you enjoy these baklavas! Being virtual they are also kind for our diet balance.

Antoine Bungler91 (talk) 14:21, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015[edit]

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to Lana (wrestling): you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. w^L^{<speak·check>} 06:40, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting for lack of content[edit]

Hello. I saw that you'd posted a "no-content" speedy deletion tag at Bahiridev Temple-Sarde. The article has an infobox, though, and the information in an infobox counts as content. See WP:CSD A3. —Largo Plazo (talk) 11:14, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

on my contribution[edit]

Sir, I do not need threats against me for editing out what only is seen as a false claim from a tabloid. I'm fairly new here but I know I do not intend to have a user threaten me. I can give several reasons why it is false, it has only existed via internet. If you look into the real world, nothin much happened but however Wikipedia is a sight that is to be only truthful and accurate information. People should not be given such false claims onboth pages. Lollithinug23687 (talk) 13:52, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

CSD#G4[edit]

You may wish to re-read Wikipedia:CSD#G4 in the context of Draft:Zeeshan Haider. Obviously the draft is not fit to become a Wikipedia article in its current state, but G4 is not an appropriate criterion for deletion in this case. - David Biddulph (talk) 09:41, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@David Biddulph: The page appears to be bad-faith recreation of a repeatedly deleted page created by the same user. How may this be addressed? MopSeeker Fox Three! 13:44, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is now an incomplete draft, rather than an article. If the draft eventually gets submitted for review, it will be dealt with accordingly; it it gets abandoned G13 applies. If you believe that it meets any of the speedy criteria, then tag it accordingly, but remember that some apply only to articles, not to drafts. Things like copyright violation apply to any namespace. If you are unfamiliar with the various deletion processes other than speedy, see Wikipedia:Deletion policy. - David Biddulph (talk) 13:52, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@David Biddulph: Understood. One tends to be excessively hasty when dealing with disruptive editing. However, G4 does include pages moved to the draft namespace to circumvent the deletion policy. MopSeeker Fox Three! 13:57, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the fact that it is a draft doesn't automatically exclude it from G4, but the fact that there had not been a deletion discussion does exclude it. David Biddulph (talk) 14:01, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@David Biddulph: I used Twinkle for the MfD listing. Does it not perform the process correctly? Is there anything that needs to be manually done? Is the article even eligible for MfD? Apologies for the ignorance.MopSeeker Fox Three! 14:08, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know much about Twinkle, but when I first saw the MFD the task had presumably not been completed, but it apparently has been now. Those replying to the MFD will decide whether it is appropriate, but in general drafts are allowed time to be developed and to provide evidence of notability, providing that they don't violate the more rigid requirements such as copyright. - David Biddulph (talk) 14:17, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: User:Lestrade[edit]

Hello MopSeeker. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of User:Lestrade, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: User pages are only deleted under G7 if the author explicitly requests it; blanking does not qualify. Thank you. Jackmcbarn (talk) 03:56, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Speedy Deletion "El Baile en TVN"[edit]

Hi! An article I started (El Baile en TVN) was deleted because you claim there was a copyright issue. You can check on this old revision from where the blog post was published: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dancing_with_the_Stars&oldid=451386226#Chile from Sept 19 2011 (one day before the blog claimed as source).

Clearly, the blog used data from Wikipedia, not the other way around.

It'd be nice to not be falsely accused of copyright infringemet :)

Tordek (talk) 07:43, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Joseph cannata[edit]

Hello MopSeeker. Thanks for patrolling new pages – it's a very important task! I'm just letting you know, however, that you shouldn't tag pages as lacking context (CSD A1), content (CSD A3),or significance (CSD A7) moments after they are created, as you did at Joseph cannata. It's best to wait at least 10–15 minutes for more content to be added if the page is very short, and the articles should not be marked as patrolled. Tagging such pages in a very short space of time may drive away well-meaning contributors, which is not good for Wikipedia. Attack pages (G10), blatant nonsense (G1), copyright violations (G12) and pure vandalism/blatant hoaxes (G3) should of course be tagged and deleted immediately. Thanks..

@Hullaballoo Wolfowitz: Understood. As has already been shown in some previous incidents, I tend to be excessively hasty and deletionist when patrolling new pages. From now on, I will try to wait approximately 10 minutes after the creation of a page before applying the aforementioned criteria. Is this advisable? If not, how should such situations be managed?MopSeeker Fox Three! 02:52, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated[edit]

Thanks for reviewing Vechoor church, MopSeeker.

Unfortunately MrX has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

This page should not have been marked as reviewed. It has not sources and very little context. It may be helpful to read WP:NPP.

To reply, leave a comment on MrX's talk page.

New Page Patrol[edit]

We appreciate you enthusiasm but NPP is a serious opration and needs a high standard of quality. Based on a review of your patrols, I do not think yu have sufficient experience to be patrolling new pages yet. Please consider doing something less complex such as counter vandalism until you are ready for NPP. See WP:CVU. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 14:22, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Understood.MopSeeker Fox Three! 14:24, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated[edit]

Thanks for reviewing Massimo ciociola, MopSeeker.

Unfortunately Kudpung has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

PLease review this page again and apply all tags as required while immediaey making any minor corrections yourself. Thanks.

To reply, leave a comment on Kudpung's talk page.

Whisperback[edit]

Hello. You have a new message at Kudpung's talk page. 02:44, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete nomination of messesarymist bulacan[edit]

Hello MopSeeker. Thanks for patrolling new pages – it's a very important task! I'm just letting you know, however, that you shouldn't tag pages as lacking context (CSD A1), content (CSD A3),or significance (CSD A7) moments after they are created, as you did at Messesarymist bulacan. It's best to wait at least 10–15 minutes for more content to be added if the page is very short, and the articles should not be marked as patrolled. Tagging such pages in a very short space of time may drive away well-meaning contributors, which is not good for Wikipedia. Attack pages (G10), blatant nonsense (G1), copyright violations (G12) and pure vandalism/blatant hoaxes (G3) should of course be tagged and deleted immediately. Thanks. AfterOtso06 (talk) 01:09, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@AfterOtso06: Sorry for this. After being warned previously, I have attempted to implement the suggested delay during patrols. In this case, I was not aware that the page had recently been created, as I had already begun waiting out the delay, during which I performed several other actions, after which I returned to the page and tagged, assuming that the requisite delay had already passed. How can situations like this be prevented during a patrol? I have no intention to bite newcomers, or to appear as though I am doing so. Thanks, MopSeeker Fox Three! 01:56, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As many times as a page on Bulacan had been attempted to be created, you were fully justified to put an A7 tag on the article so quickly after the attempt at recreation. —C.Fred (talk) 02:03, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@C.Fred: Thanks for the clarification. At that time, I was not aware of that situation, and was performing a routine speedy deletion nomination. MopSeeker Fox Three! 13:55, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User page[edit]

"Note that my username is, at the current time, solely intended as humour, and I have no intent to apply for any administrative position." - This no longer appears to be valid. Dustin (talk) 20:12, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Uttar Pradesh Sainik School, Lucknow[edit]

I noticed you nominated the article on Uttar Pradesh Sainik School, Lucknow for speedy deletion. It's a moot point now, because there was already an article on that topic, so I turned the page into a redirect, but I wanted you to know that the rules for A7 speedy deletion (significance) specifically exempt schools and other educational institutions. It's a rule I hate, but there it is. I have found that the only way to deal with bad school pages is to PROD or AfD them. Even then it's difficult, as institutions of higher education are presumed notable, and many people extend that to high schools as well, but sometimes it works. In any case, thank you for trying to keep bad pages out of Wikipedia. ubiquity (talk) 14:44, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Ubiquity: Thanks for the personal message and sympathy. Sorry for the inexperience. a CLoG? | unCLoG 14:46, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Showbizbro[edit]

Merging two lines with a redirect makes two lines, not an article.Xx236 (talk) 10:03, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Xx236: What is being referred to (talked about) here? Sorry if I committed some kind of error. a CLoG? | unCLoG 17:26, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, A Certain Lack of Grandeur. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cranh124.
Message added 18:59, 2 September 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Vanjagenije (talk) 18:59, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 9[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lazy Dog (bomb), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battlefield. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:34, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Davao Chinatown[edit]

Hello! Thank you for patrolling my article and please give me a lot of time to finish it. To have a source and other details of my article (Davao Chinatown). Thank you again! GOD Bless! — Preceding unsigned comment added by WanHaeShin10 (talk • contribs) 06:22, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@WanHaeShin10: Do not worry, I will (probably) not nominate that article for deletion, as it seems rather well-written (for such a new article) the last time I saw it. Please do try to add references though, as they are of considerable importance to Wikipedia articles. Thanks, a CLoG? | unCLoG 20:34, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome ![edit]

The Prince Hodong and Princess Nakrang article may, perhaps, require copy editing for grammar, style, cohesion, tone, or spelling. Your are really so great to have detected this possibility in less than an hour after the release of the first version ! Any way, you are welcome to process by yourself to the required copy editing, if any. Pldx1 (talk) 21:13, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Pldx1: I do not have time to do any copyediting at the moment. a CLoG? | unCLoG 21:15, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference cited for the content removed[edit]

Hello!!

This has reference to the content removed from the Acharya Narendra Dev College. The content changed was authentic. The accuracy of the content can be checked on the official website of the Institution: [1].

--Saritasanjay (talk) 16:57, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Saritasanjay:Understood. To avoid future confusion, please explain such things clearly in the edit summary to avoid confusion or misinterpretation. Thanks, a CLoG? | unCLoG 19:35, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unreviewed page[edit]

Hi,

Just looking for a check on the unrieview on an obvious copyvio? Seems fairly clearcut so not sure why it would need re-reviewing. Amortias (T)(C) 19:05, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Amortias: Oops. I was not aware of exactly how the review/unreview system works, and did not intend to do this. Sorry for the inconvenience. a CLoG? | unCLoG 19:07, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, I've done worse by accident. Amortias (T)(C) 19:08, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored deleted material to David Lisak article[edit]

The research reported in this article is controversial, and an account of the controversy is needed to fairly represent the status of the scholarship. The fact that the criticism is focused on one source (Reason.com) was noted. Lisak's research was fairly represented, at much greater length than the controversy. The criticism is not "undue" since it is a valid academic controversy. Much of what was deleted was included in the original article, so deleting it makes no sense unless the idea is to protect the article's subject from criticism that is happening beyond Wikipedia. JCvP 06:31, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

@Jvpwiki: Understood. Will exercise greater awareness and care in the future. a CLoG? | unCLoG 07:15, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hooray! You created your Teahouse profile![edit]

	Welcome to the Teahouse Badge
	Awarded to editors who have introduced themselves at the Wikipedia Teahouse. Guest editors with this badge show initiative and a great drive to learn how to edit Wikipedia. Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges
Thank you for introducing yourself and contributing to Wikipedia! If you have any questions feel free to drop me a line at my talk page. Happy Editing! ~ Anastasia [Missionedit] (talk) 01:15, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your Username[edit]

Hello. This is kind of unrelated to Wikipedia, but why is your username A Certain Lack of Grandeur, when your signature is MopSeeker? Did you change your name, or did you just edit your signature? Spike789 ^Talk 20:52, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Spike789: That was my old username. I changed it because it was a joke and people might take it too literally.a CLoG? | unCLoG 21:03, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, A Certain Lack of Grandeur. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Battlefield[edit]

Per your comment at Talk:Battlefield, the draft at Draft:Battlefield is ready to go. I thought you might want to make the move request. Cheers! bd2412 T 02:08, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note, if you do, please make a multimove request, so that both Battlefield and Battleground can point to the draft, once moved to mainspace. Cheers again! bd2412 T 18:19, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@BD2412: I no longer remember making such a comment, but thanks! Will do as you suggested.

I have added subst:submit to the draft. How is the multimove request made? Sorry.

A multimove request is made using the multimove template at Wikipedia:Requested moves. In this case, it would be added to Talk:Battlefield and would be something like:

{{subst:requested move

| new1 = Battlefield (disambiguation)

| current2 = Battleground

| new2 = Battleground (disambiguation)

| reason = (text explaining why these pages should be moved to make way for [[Draft:Battlefield]] to move to mainspace).}}

bd2412 T 14:06, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@BD2412: Sorry for having become so unskilled. I have been too busy to edit Wikipedia much lately. Seriously, though, thanks for the contribution. a CLoG? | unCLoG 14:13, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for still being around! bd2412 T 14:15, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battlefield has been accepted[edit]

Battlefield, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 22:45, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@BD2412: The above is for you. a CLoG? | unCLoG 23:57, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, A Certain Lack of Grandeur. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, A Certain Lack of Grandeur. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, A Certain Lack of Grandeur. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]