User talk:AKA MBG/Archive 1

List of cycles

Thanks for putting up your excellent list of cycles! Do you mind if I edit the page to include a link to a category in each unchecked cycle (e.g. Category:Communication_design)? This will make checking through them much quicker. Dsp13 (talk) 14:29, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

Of course, you can. Thank you. AKA MBG (talk) 14:56, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

This seemed fiddly to do, and since all I wanted was a quick way to go from this page to a given category page, I used the following bookmarklet, which searches for a particular wikipedia category with whatever text is highlighted:

javascript:(function(){q=document.getSelection(); if(!q){void(q=prompt('Wikipedia keywords:',''))}; if(q)location.href='http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?search=Category:'+escape(q)})() 

Dsp13 (talk) 23:55, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for useful line of code and new word for me: bookmarklet. AKA MBG (talk) 20:03, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Any chance of updating the list of cycles? --Rumping (talk) 12:06, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

It will require to download new dump of English Wikipedia. The chance exists :). I will write it to my todo list. --AKA MBG (talk) 17:58, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

is it still on your todo list? ;) Dsp13 (talk) 00:37, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

OK. Let's wait when new dump will be ready. And I will start download this huge archive :) -- AKA MBG (talk) 09:53, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

fabulous! (Though do you need the whole thing, or only the category membership data?) Dsp13 (talk) 04:40, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

My SQL scripts require two tables: page and categorylinks. -- AKA MBG (talk) 13:39, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

OK. Now I have no time for creating "List of cycles". I will die or create Wiktionary parser. I prefer second :) -- AKA MBG (talk) 13:23, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

good luck with the parser! Dsp13 (talk) 20:03, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

WikiLook

Yes, sure. The whole source is inside .xpi file. .Xpi is an renamed .zip format - so you can open it with WinRar or 7Zip etc. The actual source code is an JavaScript. Take a look at WikiLook.js - you will find it inside. We can register SourceForge account...Or you can fork it:) Feel free to contact me by email: dr.vitall (AT] gmail.com
P.S. I will make better version by evening - hold your breath:) TestPilot^{talk to me!} 15:02, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Re:Image:Pashtun_girl.jpg

Thank you for marking this picture which you uploaded, for deletion. I notice that the reason you list it is that you have also uploaded it to Commons. For future reference, we have a Criteria for Speedy Deletion which matches what you typed in - it is CSD I8 - this is used for pictures where an exact copy is available on Commons.

I have noted this on your picture's CSD template, and if you have any questions, you may ask me or anyone on here for help! Thank you! Thor Malmjursson (talk) 05:17, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

WP:RUSSIA roll call and your input required

Privet. You are receiving this message as you were listed on the membership list of WP:RUSSIA at Wikipedia:WikiProject Russia/Members. Recent times has seen minimal activity within WikiProject Russia, and there is an attempt to re-invigorate the project and have it become more organised into a fully-fledge functioning project, with the aim of increasing the quality of Russia-related articles across English wikipedia.

As we don't know which listed members are active within the project and Russia-related article, all listed members are receiving this message, and are requested to re-affirm their active status on Russia-related article by re-adding their username to Wikipedia:WikiProject Russia/Members by adding:

# {{User|YOURUSERNAME}}

to the membership list. You may also like to place {{User Russian Project}} on your userpage, as this will also place you in Category:WikiProject Russia members.

There is also an active proposal on the creation of a single WP:RUSSIA project. The proposal can be viewed at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Russia#Proposal_for_overhaul_and_creation_of_a_single_WP:RUSSIA_project, and your comments and suggestions are welcomed and encouraged at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Russia/Proposal.

We all look forward to your continued support of WP:RUSSIA and any comments you may have on the proposal. --Russavia ^{Dialogue Stalk me} 04:41, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

RE: Russian language (team-work)

Hi Andrew, now it is my turn to make a late reply, :) Thank you for your message, and thank you for linking to an example of your work. I'm impressed with it, spoken articles for the English Wikipedia have never been that professional or interesting! I like the sound effects and music you've added.

I know you suggested History of the Russian language as a possible article to record, but I think the quality is too poor for that at the moment. It seems to need a lot of work, which of course can be done by someone who knows enough Russian! Alternatively, we may be able to find a well-developed and suitable article in Category:Russian language. Let me know what you think, if you still want to go ahead. I hope ru:Россия turned out well for you. Regards, Maedin\^talk 12:21, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Hi, Maedin! Now I am compiling 7-th part of 10 of ru:Россия. I hope that the finish is not too far :)

O'key, we can try to find a better article related to Russia language. Though... I am not sure that the huge article will be good for the begin. When I will find something, I will drop you a line. See you Hear you :) -- Andrew Krizhanovsky (talk) 13:04, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

I like the article Russian language. What do you think? -- Andrew Krizhanovsky (talk) 13:28, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

I like it, too, it looks good! I would be happy with that choice, I think. Maedin\^talk 13:35, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Fine :) Then I have the following

Plan:

1. You will record this article with the highest possible bitrate (quality).
2. Send the file(s) to me. Any format is suitable (.ogg, or .mp3, etc.)
3. I will record the Russian words in the article, e.g. the alphabet, some names, etc.
4. I will add some background music in the begin of every section. Then I will upload it to the commons.

Remarks:

• Don't read the table in the section "Russian_language#Consonants". (1) It's not interesting. (2) It's impossible :)
• Don't read the "See also" section and below.
• Please, make small pauses in the recording, when you see / encounter the Cyrillic text. It will be more simple for me to add the Russian voice.
• Also, please, make a pause when you see the wikified Russian word, e.g.: "the Volga River (pause)", " in Ryazan Region (pause)", etc. There is no Cyrillic in the text, but I can record Russian pronunciation. I think it will be interesting for the listener.
• The subsection "Contents"... In English Spoken Wikipedia there is a tradition to record it. But it's not reasonable for such not so big article. IMHO.
• If you can, then invite your local friends, your family for the recording (e.g. one voice for one section). Because I am sure that the more number of different voices lead to the more interesting article. /in my life it's a good reason to meet with my friends/

I hope, that we will live long life, so we are not limited in the time for this work. :) -- Andrew Krizhanovsky (talk) 12:22, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Clear and efficient, very good, :) I like your instructions.

You've been pretty positive so far, considering that you don't know if my voice/my accent/my microphone is any good or not. So, if it's okay with you, I will record only one or two sections first and send you the files. That way, you can check that you are happy and let me know if it's worth continuing, and you can give me tips on how I can improve (longer pauses, slower reading, faster reading, etc).

I will see if some friends are interested in recording some sections. No guarantee they'll agree though! Maedin\^talk 13:47, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

I am agree with you. It's reasonable to start from the small part of the article, e.g. the introduction (before the "Contents").

Of course, the voice of friends is optional. Since from my experience, it requires a lot of time and a fortune in order to organize this recording process. :) Good luck! -- Andrew Krizhanovsky (talk) 17:15, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Spoken wikipedia

hey, got your message on the spoken wikipedia page

i made the 3 files (syston, rearsby and the game).

i left a reply on Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Spoken_Wikipedia#Robot_voice-read_articles

Sghfdhdfghdfgfd (talk) 14:03, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Music and Spoken Wikipedia

Thanks for the suggestion to add music to my most recent addition to Spoken Wikipedia. It's much better now! -- Pjf (talk) 18:28, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

I think that now the recording is really much better. Fine!

I recommend to add the name of the used music composition (with license) to the description of the audio file, in order to escape the blame of using of copyrighted music. See an example of such description after the word "incorporating" in the File:Ru-Russia part 7 Military and Religion.ogg. My format is:

Artist - Album / Composition (License tag) 

Good luck! -- Andrew Krizhanovsky (talk) 11:12, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:SPb SCC Igor Talkov board.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:SPb SCC Igor Talkov board.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:00, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

 Done. -- Andrew Krizhanovsky (talk) 10:36, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 19:34, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

"Abiogenesis recording

Thank you so much for your advice. I will fix that. It is pretty tedious! LOL. Thank you so, so much! :D — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marmenta (talk • contribs) 07:24, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Spoken Wikipedia template

Hi. You added {{Spoken Wikipedia|You forgot poland.ogg|2005-06-25}} to the United States presidential election debates, 2004 article. Unfortunately, it says that '[the] audio file was created from a revision of the "United States presidential election debates, 2004" article dated 2005-06-25', when in fact it was created from the You forgot Poland article, which is now a redirect. Is there any way of adding the correct article name to the template? Scolaire (talk) 11:00, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

As I understand, this is very rare case, and it is first in my practice when the text of the spoken article was integrated into other article. I am not a skilled craftsman to change this complex template :( You can post your question to the talk page of {{Spoken Wikipedia}} template.

It was fun and interesting to know about this failed joke of the president, when I listening this audio file in first time :) -- Andrew Krizhanovsky (talk) 11:15, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

I have posted to the template talk page. I'm not very optimistic, however, because there doesn't seem to be very much activity there (none at all in the last year). Scolaire (talk) 21:31, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Thank you. The most intriguing and fun thing in the Wikipedia, that it is impossible to predict - when and who will improve it :) -- Andrew Krizhanovsky (talk) 13:14, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

IEG more appropriate?

Hi, Andrew.

I saw your proposal at West.andrew.g's Flow Funding page, and, while Andrew is correct that the Flow Funding program cannot support this work, I do think it's an interesting proposal, and would encourage you to submit it for consideration for funding through the Individual Engagement Grants program. The current round has already closed, but you can start developing your proposal in the Grants IdeaLab and have it in good shape for the next funding round.

Feel free to reach out to grantsadmin AT wikimedia DOT org with questions.

Cheers! Ijon (talk) 23:25, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Ijon, thank you! -- Andrew Krizhanovsky (talk) 07:37, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:21, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of British National Corpus

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article British National Corpus you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Falcon Kirtaran -- Falcon Kirtaran (talk) 10:01, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of British National Corpus

The article British National Corpus you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:British National Corpus for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Falcon Kirtaran -- Falcon Kirtaran (talk) 11:01, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

Asian 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 00:57, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 01:56, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, AKA MBG. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of British National Corpus

The article British National Corpus you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:British National Corpus for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Falcon Kirtaran -- Falcon Kirtaran (talk) 17:01, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

What level are you?

I found your name at Category:User js (probably because you posted the corresponding userbox on your user page), in the level-unspecified list of JavaScript programmers.

I was wondering how experienced you are at JavaScript, and whether you might be interested in getting involved with developing user scripts, hobnobbing with other JavaScript programmers, and organizing and improving JavaScript articles and support pages.

We do all of that and more at the JavaScript WikiProject.

Scripts undergoing development, and the state of JavaScript on Wikipedia, are discussed on the talk page.

For an overview of JavaScript coverage on Wikipedia, see Draft:Outline of JavaScript and Index of JavaScript-related articles. For everything on user scripts, see User:The Transhumanist/Outline of scripts.

The WikiProject also organizes every resource it can find about JavaScript out there, such as articles, books, tutorials, etc. See our growing Reference library. If you know of any good ones, please add them.

If you would like to join the JavaScript WikiProject, feel free to add your name to the participants list.

Hope to see you there! The Transhumanist 17:01, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, AKA MBG. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi AKA MBG! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 09:26, Monday, September 3, 2018 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, AKA MBG. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, AKA MBG. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:SPb SCC Igor Talkov board.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:SPb SCC Igor Talkov board.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Vanjagenije (talk) 20:54, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Dear @User:Vanjagenije (in Russian your name means "very clever Vanja" :), you are right. This image will be protected by the laws of Wikipedia, if there is a special section in the article titled for example "The memory about Igor Talkov reflected in the art" (as in Russian Wikipedia now "Память об Игоре Талькове в изобразительном искусстве"). So you will be correct if you will delete this photo. Хорошего дня! (Good day!) --Andrew Krizhanovsky (talk) 05:30, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Finnish-Russian University Cooperation in Telecommunication

The article Finnish-Russian University Cooperation in Telecommunication has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Articles fails GNG as no independent sources are used nor anything found online that can establish notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:25, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)