User talk:AARONWARDPittsburgh
Disambiguation link notification for April 16[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ned Cuthbert, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hits. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
A barnstar for you![edit]
(Self-barnstar giving from sockpuppet redacted)
A barnstar for you![edit]
(Self-barnstar giving from sockpuppet redacted)
A barnstar for you![edit]
(Self-barnstar giving from sockpuppet redacted)
A barnstar for you![edit]
(Self-barnstar giving from sockpuppet redacted)
A barnstar for you![edit]
(Self-barnstar giving from sockpuppet redacted)
A barnstar for you![edit]
(Self-barnstar giving from sockpuppet redacted)
A barnstar for you![edit]
(Self-barnstar giving from sockpuppet redacted)
Disambiguation link notification for April 27[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Roger Connor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hits. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
A barnstar for you![edit]
(Self-barnstar giving from sockpuppet redacted)
A barnstar for you![edit]
(Self-barnstar giving from sockpuppet redacted)
A barnstar for you![edit]
(Self-barnstar giving from sockpuppet redacted)
AARONWARDPittsburgh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
It was right to block me and I did abusive editing and disruptive editing to Wikipedia. Unblocking me will improve Wikipedia by preventing vandalism, adding new information to articles and showing great contributions from other users. Wikipedia has great administrators, good users and good information and make Wikipedia a better encyclopedia.
Decline reason:
Even now as you claim that you've suddenly reformed, your lack of sincerity can be demonstrated by you requesting unblock from multiple accounts. Max Semenik (talk) 22:17, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
AARONWARDPittsburgh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I will improve Wikipedia by helping other articles add good information and it will help the community. I am not requesting unblock from multiple accounts but from my original account. Once again I am truthfully sorry for what I have caused to Wikipedia and want offer my personal apology and to trust other users for contributions and help Wikipedia.
Decline reason:
You're the same user as ECUADORGIANTS (talk · contribs). Requesting an unblock from multiple accounts doesn't come across as sincere. PhilKnight (talk) 22:49, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
AARONWARDPittsburgh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am the same user as ECUADORGIANTS (talk · contribs), but I'm requesting an unblock from this and only account. Wikipedia has good articles and I want to help improve these articles and has good respectful administrators too.
Decline reason:
You'll need to tell us all the accounts you've created. --jpgordon::==( o ) 14:26, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Flattery is nice, but meaningless. Also, I'm not sure how you can say that you're only requesting an unblock from this account when anyone can see ECUADORGIANTS's talk page, with several unblock requests. Origamiteⓣⓒ 12:50, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
AARONWARDPittsburgh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Here I created the multiple accounts: user:JERRYWARDPittsburgh, user:TERRYWARDPittsburgh,and user:ECUADORGIANTS. I'm requesting a unblock from this user only and not from multiple accounts. I can help Wikipedia and to improve articles and has good, respectful administrators that welcome new users to Wikipedia.
Decline reason:
Under the circumstances, a Standard Offer approach could be taken in this case. PhilKnight (talk) 13:19, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Can you explain why you made this edit? It does not inspire confidence that you can be trusted. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:42, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
AARONWARDPittsburgh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I made that edit because I warned one of my own users to stop vandalizing Wikipedia and abusive editing to the articles of Wikipedia. I can actually be trusted by not doing sock puppet and helping others for Wikipedia.
Decline reason:
I do not believe that you can. And what do you mean by "one of your users"?--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 20:03, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- A CheckUser has confirmed that ECUADORGIANTS was a sockpuppet of yours, so all you were doing was sleeper interaction. That edit also shows you interpret blocks as punishment, when they are just preventive. --TL22 (talk) 17:04, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
AARONWARDPittsburgh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Yes the User:ECUADORGIANTS is a sockpuppet of mine that I created. I request an unblock from this account because I did something I should never have done, I did do sockpuppet, did create multiple accounts, doing disruptive editing and abusive editing. Unblocking me will improve Wikipedia's Articles in the future and I can be trusted by other Users.
Decline reason:
You seem that believe that a bald confession wipes the slate clean. It does not, and I do not trust you at all. I have responded to this and the above request as both were on-page simultaneously.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 20:07, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
AARONWARDPittsburgh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I don't believe a bald confession wipes a slate clean and I want to be unblock because I want to help and make great edits, add good information to articles like NFL players stats. I know that it was right to block me and I wanted to help Wikipedia and make great edits that users will contribute to that will really help Wikipedia.
Decline reason:
I agree that WP:Standard offer is the best bet. Come back in 6+ months and we can discuss then. only (talk) 02:49, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.