User talk:A1NTME

June 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to H. Kramer and Company, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Channel ® 13:35, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just curious on how the information was not constructive. I simply put in the correct information about the company and the services it provides to the world.

The edit you made was fine (I imagine ChannelR reverted you accidentally). I protected the page mainly due to Correctedit's edits, which read like an advertisement. · AndonicO ^Engage. 17:10, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Any chance for protection removal? User:A1NTME

I didn't revert by mistake, I reverted because A1NTME turned the article into excatly the same advertisement that Correctedit used to do. Channel ® 21:30, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Since I am pretty new at this, might either of you be able to provide some feedback on how we can edit the page correctly and make it acceptable? Any tips/hints will be great.

One thing I would like your opinions on...if the page is for H Kramer & Company, why is it focused on another organizations work? The article is centered around the work of PERRO, www.pilsenperro.org, and not the company itself. I do believe the information has a place on the page but it should not be the main content. Just curious on how some of this works and how to correctly get the information about the company in instead of 2-3 year old information that is no longer true. That is the thing that kills me the most about some organizations, they slam a company and make them look bad but when the company rectifies the issues, that organization never goes back to state that thing have been fixed, just keep up stale content/figures/etc that make the company appear bad. They did update their own page but not all pages that revolve around the issue.User:A1NTME

Well, if you'd like to improve the article, there are a few things you need to be aware of first: Correctedit's version was "spammy," it read like an advertisement (I assume that account also belongs to you—apologies if this is incorrect); to prevent this, the article must be written neutrally (here's our policy on this), and be verifiable (also policy) (see also our guidelines for sources). I'll unlock the article so you can edit. · AndonicO ^Engage. 12:35, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the help and the other account is not mine, not sure who's account that is.

Welcome.[edit]

Somewhat late, but here's a welcome:

Welcome!

Hello, A1NTME, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! · AndonicO ^Engage. 12:38, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]