User talk:98.198.136.216
Older warnings may have been removed, but are still visible in the page history.
[Admin: block | unblock / Info: contribs | page moves | block log | block list]
June 2010[edit]
This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Chris Matthews, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. (sock) SummerPhD (talk) 03:52, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Chris Matthews. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Adding your opinion that Matthews is a liberal to the lead is inappropriate. The issue is dealt with later in the article. JPMcGrath (talk) 09:40, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Katie Couric. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 04:10, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Katie Couric. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Jusdafax 04:18, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
WP:AGF[edit]
I reviewed your edit summaries and you're definitely pushing the envelope. Suggest you read WP:AGF, otherwise you will soon be blocked. ----moreno oso (talk) 04:28, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Katie Couric. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --moreno oso (talk) 04:52, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to Katie Couric, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --moreno oso (talk) 04:53, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
{{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Courcelles (talk) 05:07, 21 June 2010 (UTC)- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to Katie Couric, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. SummerPhD (talk) 07:22, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
July 2010[edit]
This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Katie Couric, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. SummerPhD (talk) 03:14, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
You may contest this block by adding the text
{{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Rick Sanchez has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. elektrikSHOOS 02:26, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Rick Sanchez. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. — e. ripley\talk 02:30, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
{{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. —Eustress talk 02:37, 21 July 2010 (UTC) | This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |