User talk:92.236.63.92

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Recent edits to AirPower (hardware)[edit]

Information icon Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, AirPower (hardware), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Ruyter (talkedits) 18:53, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reverting me. You were correct. Ruyter (talkedits) 19:11, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
No problem, I reverted those edits because they were adding incorrect info and were reverting my originally correct edits (their edits said the device was cancelled), I wasn't intending to cause disruption. :) 92.236.63.92 (talk) 19:15, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Seby1541. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to YouTube Rewind 2018: Everyone Controls Rewind have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Seby1541 22:19, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2019[edit]

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Super Mario Maker 2, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. We know the game has single-player, and sources already cover that. We don't know if it also has multiplayer. Single-play is confirmed, so listed. If multiplayer is confirmed, it will also be added. -- ferret (talk) 19:17, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Super Mario Maker 2. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Follow WP:BRD. You don't get to make an edit that goes against guidelines, then open a discussion and try to force your way. -- ferret (talk) 19:19, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
I can't believe how rude the people are on here. My edit is not vandalism and you know it. Please explain right here what I'm doing wrong, because as far as I know, I'm following Wikipedia guidelines by using official sources. 92.236.63.92 (talk) 19:27, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This is not the vandalism warning. It's the disruption warning, because you've continued to make this edit repeatedly over several weeks after having been reverted several times, with other editors leaving edit notes as to why. I've responded to your talk page section as well, with the WHY this edit is not appropriate. I see you've already replied there but ignored most of what I said. If you make the edit again, you're likely to see a block. -- ferret (talk) 19:34, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It's more that you've ignored me - as I've stated multiple times I've used official sources. Is there something I'm not understanding here, or is the official website apparently a rumour by your definition? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.236.63.92 (talk) 19:37, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I've replied on the article's talk page again. -- ferret (talk) 19:39, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I think there's been a misunderstanding here, I apologise, I've left a reply on the talk page.92.236.63.92 (talk) 19:44, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019[edit]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at St Joseph's Catholic Academy, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please do not add non-notable people. If they do not have an article written about them, they probably do not pass WP:GNG. Ifnord (talk) 18:59, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.