User talk:91.214.169.69

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Grimoirium Imperium[edit]

Lovecraft wrote on several occasions that Abdul Alhazred was a name he created for himself when he was a child. Therefore that source, which says it is derived from the works of Abd Al-Hazred (another version of the same name) is also completely fictional. --Ebyabe talk - General Health ‖ 09:46, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I mean to dig deeper into Dee's writings eventually, but just noticed that discrepancy I do know of. It would be awesome to see what you've said cited in the relevant articles. The related articles could use more inter-linkages too in a handful of places. I'm not up to a big hack atm unfortunately. --91.214.169.69 talk - General Health ‖ 02:17, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017[edit]

Hello, I'm My name is not dave. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Extortion seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. My name isnotdave (talk/contribs) 13:03, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2020[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm 47.227.95.73. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Newt Gingrich 2012 presidential campaign have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. 47.227.95.73 (talk) 23:55, 7 July 2020 (UTC) [reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Hillary Clinton email controversy, you may be blocked from editing. Denvercoder9 (talk) 23:56, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to User talk:Troutfarm27. GorillaWarfare (talk) 00:02, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020: blocked[edit]

Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for block evasion.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

As demonstrated here. And that's on top of vandalism. -- Hoary (talk) 00:10, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock please[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

91.214.169.69 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

This is a shared IP address. My ISP use CGNAT (carrier grade nat) to share same public IP between multiple customers, it appears another user who shares this IP address participated in vandalism. I kindly request my IP address to be unblocked as it is a shared IP and because these vandalism is not my doing.

Decline reason:

We have no way of knowing who is sitting at the computer operating under this IP address at any given time, we only know that inappropriate edits came from here. If you were not responsible for those edits, then you are not the target of the block, and you should request an account at WP:ACC so you can avoid getting caught up in blocks meant to target others. 331dot (talk) 09:58, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.