User talk:91.157.10.191

January 2018

Hello, I'm CASSIOPEIA. I noticed that in this edit to Narmer, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CASSIOPEIA (talk) 13:10, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to 740s BC, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. RA0808 ^talk_contribs 18:18, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

You were right!!

Thank you for your edit on Osorkon IV! I was wrong to undo it and I am glad that to have been put right. Peftjauawybast wasn't Osorkon's best friend after all...Iry-Hor (talk) 18:43, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

History of agriculture

Hi, I've undone your edit because you didn't cite any sources - this is critically important. If you have the sources you used to hand, feel free to make the changes you intended, suitably cited. Please make sure you are familiar with WP:V and WP:RS. Many thanks, Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:09, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Many thanks for the citations. Chiswick Chap (talk) 20:05, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Two more things (sorry): please use the same citation format as in the article, e.g. Doe, John not Doe J; and, please don't place refs in the lead section - its job is only to summarize the body of the article, not to introduce new claims of any kind. Thanks. Chiswick Chap (talk) 06:48, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

May 2018

Hello, I'm Classicwiki. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, New Guinea, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 15:06, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Gear. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 10:46, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Sword

Sorry, but that edit summary really smacked of original research/guesswork. Better to find a better source. Drmies (talk) 03:55, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

• Wait--source unavailable? Drmies (talk) 03:57, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

December 2018 Warning

Your recent editing history at Japan Self-Defense Forces shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
I suggest you go back to the talk page and discuss, rather than engage in an edit war. Follow WP:BRD, which is expected of all users.Garuda28 (talk) 22:41, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

---