User talk:70.209.198.29

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create a named account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (70.209.198.29) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a new Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).

Happy editing! Dlthewave (talk) 04:08, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017[edit]

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Dlthewave (talk) 04:14, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may not revert at Unite the Right more than one in 24 hours[edit]

See the notice on the talk page. You'll be blocked if you continue to revert. Doug Weller talk 05:26, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've never reverted edits, only added information, but I get the point. I don't think people complaining about what "the far right" are trying to do should have any bearing on whether or not a particular detail which was not speculative in nature should be added to the page. You shouldn't be backing political edits. The excuse the first person gave when they reverted my edit was that Heyer's mother was "just speaking off the cuff". How could they know that? It's obvious that there's a particular narrative that they want to put forward. 70.209.198.29 (talk) 05:36, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
You're right about not backing "political edits". You trying to add the detail about the heart attack is a political edit, and I don't back it. It's obvious that there's a particular narrative that you want to put forward. Rockypedia (talk) 09:10, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
What's political about someone dying of a heart attack? My narrative is the objective truth. 70.209.198.29 (talk) 09:38, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
See the article talk page about why no one believes your explanation of your "narrative". Thanks for editing. Good luck in your future endeavors, and bless your heart. Rockypedia (talk) 12:25, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]