User talk:4twenty42o/Archive 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You do not have new messages (last change).

My talk.. If you are here because I reverted an edit and made a mistake or accused you of vandalism please be civil and I'll fix it. No reason to curse or SHOUT. Accidents do happen...

Please remember that:

DGAFThis user doesn't give a fuck about your opinion and thinks that angry editors should chill out and remember we were all new once upon a time.


/Archive1

Sapsltl so called "Vandalism"

I wasn't vandalising Sapsltl's userpage, I was restoring it, since he is my best friend in real life, sir. SH6 06:06, 14 November 2009 (UTC)


Tagging an editor with a UW-V1 for a difference of opinion?

Hiya: I noticed this edit where you responded by deleting the change and tagging his/her talk page with a UW-V1 notice. In fact, it appears the edit you responded to was legitimate, but even if editor's assessment of the facts were off it should not have been considered a bad-faith edit, i.m.h.o..... Best: HarryZilber (talk) 16:14, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

That most certainly was not a difference of opinion, as I have no opinion on the matter. I misunderstood the content of the edit and have apologized. On my screen I saw quite a few seemingly random edits to a show that I was actually watching at that very moment and while I most certainly did not assume bad faith

(ie.. test edit template instead of vandalism) it did appear that the editor was stringing the edits along. - 4twenty42o (talk) 17:00, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

PSD

My edit on the PSD disambiguation page wasn't intended to be a test edit. I changed it because PSD is the Ethnologue code for Plains Indian Sign Language. I alphabetized the section because it didn't seem to have any organization. Danebell (talk) 16:23, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

Message

Hi thank you for your message - actually I have been here for over a year - I created most of Granny Takes a Trip - but I started again recently. I contribute on 'swinging London' mostly. I hope you like The Pheasantry which I created. I just need to get a photo of it. Regards, and thank you again for your kind message. I had a few friends here who seem to have left. West one girl (talk) 19:34, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

Allahpundit

I removed a duplicate </ref> tag; how is that a test edit? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.244.147.41 (talk) 03:16, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

121.218.77.253

User talk:121.218.77.253 has been vandalizing other sections RB30DE and I --Dana60Cummins (talk) 17:30, 15 November 2009 (UTC) have been dealing with this for a while. I'm not sure where to take it. But 121.218.77.253 is in charge of 3 other articles now. Let me know if there is anything I can do. --Dana60Cummins (talk) 17:30, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, 4twenty42o. You have new messages at 121.218.77.253's talk page.
Message added 19:02, 15 November 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

The user responded to your warnings. Tim1357 (talk) 19:02, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

User:98.114.116.128

I reverted your Level 4 warning to the author of this edit as I believe it was undeserved. If I've missed something and it was deserved, please tell me. --ThejadefalconSing your songThe bird's seeds 21:02, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

I see it and no problem. I was reverting when you stepped in. I am having a delay problem with huggle again today. When I click to revert one thing sometimes another pops up as I am clicking it. - 4twenty42o (talk) 21:05, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
No problem. Everyone has their off-days. --ThejadefalconSing your songThe bird's seeds 21:09, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for my talkpage vandal reversion. :o) GedUK  22:11, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

np :) - 4twenty42o (talk) 22:13, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

Garbo

Uhm, could youleave my edit on the Garbo page alone. Am working on it. Will add refs and more. Thanks. Sbzipper (talk) 22:15, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

Trivia sections are discouraged, even with sources. Secondly, just add it all in in one big edit next time. --ThejadefalconSing your songThe bird's seeds 22:19, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

Kemal Sunal

This might be a bit flowery, but definitely not vandalism, eh? --NeilN talk ♦ contribs 23:31, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

Absolutely not vandalism. I struck my message and dropped an apology. I am still tweaking huggle, thats where the vandalism template comes from. For some reason when I revert a change after another user reverts the same person huggle gets a little rude. Regards - 4twenty42o (talk) 23:36, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
Thanks. I've used huggle in the past and know it's a little temperamental. --NeilN talk ♦ contribs 23:49, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

SCUM Manifesto

The edit I made to the SCUM Manifesto thing was highly constructive as it concisely and precisely helped explain the nature of the SCUM Manifesto. The fact that some people might not like that word has no bearing whatsoever on its truth value, and therefore its encyclopedic appropriateness. Macai (talk) 00:27, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Pot pie, and 142.163.98.203

Hi, I was going to suggest you got HG, but I see you already have it. In regards to the warning at here, I gave a level 3, 'cause the IP had done three vandal edits very quickly, you would have been with your rights to give them a level 4 or level 4-only and reported them to AIV, using the ARV tab at the top of their page. They seemed to have stopped now so there is no problem, but sometimes you need to be aggressive and not hesitate to use the system. When I revert vandalism I check to see when the last warning was given and make sure that I am going through the levels, to discourage the vandal, I usually ignore any automated pop up and do any warning manually, as I know that the tools used can sometimes do something different (such as miss a step in an AfD). Kudos to you for all your vandal fighting. Darrenhusted (talk) 01:21, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

I see and thank you for your input. Cheers! - 4twenty42o (talk) 01:24, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Goth subculture

Thanks for your reverts over at that article. I find it interesting that, shortly after the anonymous user was blocked, two new accounts were created, Tathbreaker and RJS59, who immediately objected to the reverts and block on the article talk page. RJS59 also reverted some edits I had made on the List of gothic rock bands article, once again reverting to the anonymous user's version. He also posted on that article's talk page, objecting to my block of the anon. I find this timing entirely too coincidental. Nothing has been done, at this point, that amounts to vandalism, so a check-user is unlikely. But, if it quacks like a duck... Anyway, thanks again for the back-up. Cheers! ---RepublicanJacobiteThe'FortyFive' 03:56, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

No worries. I have been off for a few days straight doing RC. I'll keep my eyes on things there. If you see any socking report it immediately. Regards - 4twenty42o (talk) 04:07, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

LOL. Just seriously. LOL.RJS59 (talk) 04:37, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Keep it up.. - 4twenty42o (talk) 04:39, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Conard High School

The explanation I gave was "Remove meaningless mission statement" and the content removed was:

Mission Statement

In what way is this meaningful encyclopedic content ? Mean as custard (talk) 16:22, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

You are removing souced information from the articles. Please stop, if you do not like how the article reads and someone disagrees and reverts you, you should take it to the talk. Since I am not the only editor to disagree then I suggest you invite them to the discussion as well. - 4twenty42o (talk) 16:31, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

stopzilla

what happend to the investigation about the IP address (possible is3 employee) editing the stopzilla page? Also, user Ferretx seems to have the same behavior on editing the stopzilla page. He/she just deleted referenced material that was critical of stopzilla. all that remains at the moment is the IS3 Press release. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.126.0.230 (talk) 17:34, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

74.223.130.162 is back, he/she just purged all but the pres-release from the stopzilla page. I really believe this guy is an employee of IS3, what happened to that investigation? near as I can tell it vanished. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kangry (talk • contribs) 23:46, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

thanks--Kangry (talk) 23:51, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

Ugh.. is there a way to see if Ferretx is the same person as that IP address. if it's not the same person, they share a brain. --Kangry (talk) 23:58, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

If you believe that an editor is using sockpuppets see WP:SPI - 4twenty42o (talk) 00:00, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

Fallout 3

So what constitutes vandalism? I would assume it is writing things that have no relation to the topic in order to deface and/shock readers (e.g. sexually explicit words that have relation to article). I don't see how what I wrote was vandalism. I do understand that references are needed but how is original research handled? In the case of Fallout 3, does that mean there had to be an article cited from a "writer" that isn't me? It can be from any writer? Apologize for being a noob! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Reconman43 (talk • contribs) 20:15, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Vandalism

I reverted the vandalism for you...your welcome! :)Accdude92 (talk to me!) (sign) 20:36, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Speedy removed from St simons community church

Hi 4twenty42o. I've removed your G1 tagging of St simons community church, since the article wasn't just nonsense. The writing was pretty poor but poor writing is specifically excluded from G1 by the criteria. Cheers, Olaf Davis (talk) 23:12, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

A slightly late thank you

...for reverting the personal attacks on my talk page yesterday. I like the outtake on your user page. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 23:19, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

A false positive

I have reverted your edit here, where you erroneously identified the previous one as vandalism. (On any other page, that would have been vandalism, but not on this one.) -- Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 02:46, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Damn huggle doesn't care if its vandalism or not!! Seriously though I didn't think it was vandalism, just poor sentence format. I'll drop by IP talk and issue proper apologies. Thank you - 4twenty42o (talk) 02:54, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Quickie

Beat me to it--good work! Drmies (talk) 03:21, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

hi

Why do you insist César Escola be redirected to The Sims 3? 152.3.249.70 (talk) 04:12, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

I was trying to revert the user and caught you instead. I reverted it back. I was trying to catch the person changing it to warn them. - 4twenty42o (talk) 04:14, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Your reverts

Please slow down and double check some of your reverts. I'm seeing a few times where you've had to revert yourself, or times where you've made inappropriate reverts. This was actually a positive edit by the IP that you reverted and warned him for. I don't see what's vandalism about this rewording either. This, too, wouldn't qualify as vandalism as well since it's an edit dispute. A lot of your revert work is good, but please be more careful with the tools as improper reverts may scare away users. Thanks, either way (talk) 04:15, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Look closely at the last 2 and understand the first is IMO a poorly worded change. The second however claimed to reach a consensus and had not. I understand completely what you mean but in both cases a template may not have been in order but a revert certainly seemed to be. The first one mystifies me. I think its a lag issue I seem to have occasionally with huggle. I will of course strike any comments I have left inappropriately and I thank you for your feed back and advice. Regards - 4twenty42o (talk) 04:23, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
A revert may be in order, but using a tool like Huggle to make the reverts is not. Huggle is a tool for reverting vandalism, not for poor rewordings or edit disputes. either way (talk) 04:28, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
Understood - 4twenty42o (talk) 04:29, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

If I may comment, Huggle is not just for vandalism. It is important, however, to not just hit the "revert and warn" button when an edit requires a more in-depth response. Take the time to write the user a message, instead of using a template. That, at least, is what I would like/expect as a well intentioned newbie. Tim1357 (talk) 04:41, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

P.S. (MAN, you're like a MACHINE, do you even SLEEP? Im Impressed!) Tim1357 (talk) 04:41, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
LOL yea I have a little time on my hands the last 2 weeks or so. I do try to stop and talk to people I may have bitten and explain myself. I think I have apologized to 25 people in the last few days because I hit the wrong button, so I am quickly learning to pay more attention. Thanks for your feed back as well. I accept all criticism posi and negi and drive on. - 4twenty42o (talk) 04:45, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
Please read WP:REVERT to see what edits you may revert; it should not be used to edit war (ex [1]). I implore you to take note of this before I or another administrator is forced to remove your rollback privileges. Thanks. —Ed (talk • contribs) 04:49, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
It is not my intention to abuse the privilege of rollback. I will lay off of it and renew my reading on the subject in order to avoid this problem again. - 4twenty42o (talk) 05:13, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

I have that problem too. I just discovered the undo button, I use it quite a bit when I hit the wrong button. Tim1357 (talk) 03:26, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Im still learning about huggle but so far I am not a huge fan. I figured out however how to apologize over and over.. :) - 4twenty42o (talk) 03:52, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

"vandalism" of real madrid page

I "vandalised" real madrid's page? by adding flags to the table I CREATED to denote what company is from what country? in case you haven't noticed, every other football's club website that has one of these tables does the EXACT same thing. take a look at Barcelona's page. As far as I'm concerned, it's informational. Especially because a company like Teka does not have a wikipedia page and it took me hours to figure out what country they are from or what business they are even involved in. If someone wanted to know where Teka is from, they would have known. but not now... yup, I vandalised a table i made (that took me around 3 hours to compile correct and accurate information and format for wikipedia) to better the Real Madrid page. I'm a vandal. it looks SO horrible to have the flags displayed next to the company doesnt it? Splitfire1000 (talk) 04:55, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

alright man, I appologize as well. haha, sorry to go off on that. it was pretty dumb of me. Splitfire1000 (talk) 00:48, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

No worries, happy editing - 4twenty42o (talk) 00:50, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Thank you

Thanks for reverting that vandalism to my talk page. Keep up the good work.  7  04:28, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

No problem.. Cheers! - 4twenty42o (talk) 04:31, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Can you check the facts before you accuse someone of vandalism?

Look, the PRC passport page is filled with info that misrepresent the ease of travel of ordinary passport holders. I started out by moving the gazillion countries that impose special rules on PRC ordinary passport holders to a special category. You didn't like it and reverted it back. So I removed it completely to truly reflect the ease of travel for a common PRC citizen with a commoner's passport, and you started accusing me of vandalism and started warning me that I'll be blocked. What the heck! You're the one who's not in the know. Check your facts before you accuse people and block people's editing functions.

The whole point of the having a section on any passport page is to reflect to be best of our ability the ease of travel of the holder of that passport, specifically for ordinary citizens who are not on anyway on official business or specially endorsed. A common citizen's ease of travel. That's the fact the page is suppose to reflect. The current set info on the PRC passport page is filled with conditions, exceptions and also official/official/On Official Business rules that do not apply to the VAST MAJORITY of PRC passport holders. When I started out by moving those exceptions/conditions to another category, you weren't happy about it. What exactly is your goal of adding those confusing terms mixed together? Do you have an ulterior motive of some sort? Stop harrassing people! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.112.190.20 (talk) 05:06, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

Hi, Thanks for that vandal reversion on my page... :) AruNKumaRTalK 12:04, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

No worries.. - 4twenty42o (talk) 15:19, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for mine also! DMacks (talk) 20:47, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
No worries.. although in your case I would suggest a perm block. That IP was very annoying and persistent. Cheers - 4twenty42o (talk) 20:49, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
IP-hopper:( DMacks (talk) 21:13, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Speedy Delete

Hi oops I forget to say about Sunfighter band getting in the charts in 1976 - could you undelete the john adam hardman page and include that please? Here is the youtube link for verification; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gMhruzOgTug kate ----

Your User Page

You may want to request semi-protection on your user page so only established editors can edit it. --NeilN talk ♦ contribs 16:56, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

wow yea I just saw that.. RfPP? Use that for user pages as well? - 4twenty42o (talk) 16:58, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
No problem. It'd simply be rude of me not to help out. --ThejadefalconSing your songThe bird's seeds 17:03, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
Yep, RFPP works for user pages as well. Or just ask your friendly neighbourhood admin directly. --NeilN talk ♦ contribs 17:19, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
Done. ;-) —Ed (talk • majestic titan) 21:21, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Kurt Cobain

I have got video evidence that he played Seasons In The Sun on drums and it is on the talk page. Megabar09 (talk) 17:22, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

One youtube video hardly establishes the notability of Cobain as a drummer. I don't think you understand quite how all of this works. I have seen video of Tommy Lee jamming on a bass with other musicians. Does that establish Tommy as a notable bassist? Come on now whats the real problem here? - 4twenty42o (talk) 17:30, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Thank you

... for the revert on my talkpage (which I wasn't even remotely angry, or even mildly cross, about!) LessHeard vanU (talk) 20:57, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Yea that was one editor spamming the same message to about 50 talk pages. It was more of a spam issue than vandalism I suppose.. Cheers - 4twenty42o (talk) 21:00, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

hi

i don't want to edit a section i want to add one? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.56.235.17 (talk) 02:01, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

I sent you a welcome template. Go to your user talk page and check it out. All of the information you seek is in there. If you are still unsure after that, come back and see me. regards - 4twenty42o (talk) 02:06, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
ur so sweet! <3 Jess Selders 2012 (talk) 02:14, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
lol.. no not really.. - 4twenty42o (talk) 02:15, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

Re:Major League Baseball Japan All-Star Series

No problem friend.If i do a mistake, u have full right to undo it.Moreover, u also made me understand my mistake.I appreciate that. And one more thing, your fight against vandalism is exceptional; adding my appreciation to that too...And thanks again for reverting vandal on my user page.. :) arunkumarcheckmate me 07:14, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

No worries. Thank you for the kind word. Cheers! - 4twenty42o (talk) 07:16, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Florix

Hello 4twenty42o, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I declined the speedy deletion of Florix - a page you tagged - because: A7 does not apply to software. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion before tagging further pages. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. Coffee // have a cup // ark // 11:37, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

your 'fake' message bar

Hello, 4twenty42o. I'm not an admin, but of course you know that. I was asked this before, so I guess it works with you too. The 'fake' message bar is actually violating people and putting stress on them with 'fake' messages. Doing this may make you blocked. Thanks! SH6 20:11, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

Indeed.. I'm violating people..?? Um.. - 4twenty42o (talk) 20:15, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
I think he's implying you're raping people's brains. Also known as "mind-f*cking." Am I correct? --ThejadefalconSing your songThe bird's seeds 20:19, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
You won't get blocked but you'll get a few comments about it. I remember when that thing spread like wildfire about 2 - 2.5 years ago. It gradually died out as consensus was it was distracting and confusing to newbies. --NeilN talk ♦ contribs 20:22, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
I got it from Project Fun I believe.. I remember seeing it a few years back when I was editing anonymously and just had to have one!! Really though its more of a mind f*ck for me when I log on and go to my talk.. "Hey wait a minute there are no messages!!" Of course though I welcome all comments be they positive or negative.. - 4twenty42o (talk) 20:30, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
Damn its vandalize Wikipedia hour here.. - 4twenty42o (talk) 23:25, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, but I found this while searching through one of my old friend's account. Please note that the user T'Shael has nothing to do with this conversation.

Hi. Could you please remove the fake new messages bar per WP:UP. -t'shaelchat 08:10, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Because it is simulating a MediaWiki interface. Users have been blocked for it before. See here. Regretfully, the version you have still violates WP:UP. However, I do appreciate your understanding. -t'shaelchat 08:16, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
As long as it doesn't resemble the new message bar (i.e. including inside the orange border). -t'shaelchat 08:19, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
Take it out of the orange banner and it's fine. -t'shaelchat 08:24, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
Not a problem. Thanks for your understanding. -t'shaelchat 08:29, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

See what I mean? Thanks! SH6 08:22, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

pls help me these people are retarded

yeah i know their being retarded around here. anyway, can u pls help me, this guy from another school says cheerleaders are banned for adding wiki is that true? i don't understand why if rotc people like him are allowed. he's kiind of rude he blocked me b4 i could even reply to him on his talk page. thx. <3 Jess Selders 2012 (talk) 00:04, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
You are being accused of sockpuppetry. There is not a whole lot that I can suggest to you. The name you are using as not been warned or accused of vandalism as of yet. However if the admins decide to do a checkuser and they find out you are the same person you will probably be banned. If you are the "cheerleader sockpuppet", I can only suggest that you come clean now before they find out on their own or crawl into a hole and not edit anything for a long ass time. While some of the admins here can be a bit.. unforgiving, most are reasonable adults. They understand that people make mistakes and act accordingly. If you want me to add my opinion to the sock case or talk to the admins, then you are in the wrong place. I have no authority on Wikipedia at all. For what it is worth however I try to assume good faith in all things and if you tell me you are not the sock, then I will believe you. Good luck and best wishes - 4twenty42o (talk) 00:52, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
P.S. Calling people retards is not going to endure you to any admin or editor. Please avoid that kind of incivility - 4twenty42o (talk) 00:55, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
The user isn't banned... They haven't even been blocked (yet). I would say placing the "ban" template at this point was a bit unjustified. Thoughts on this? I'm not watching this page, so if you reply, could you do it on my talk page? Thanks. Netalarmtalk 04:41, 20 November 2009 (UTC)



It is sad that you had to get caught up in all of this; the User:LBHS Cheerleader is a bunch of meatpuppet cheerleaders from Charlotte County, Florida (namely Charlotte Tarpon, and/or Lemon Bay Manta Ray cheerleaders) who for some unknown reason get thrills off of harassing people at Wikipedia. It is nice that you have assumed good faith in this situation, but there's almost no chance that these girls will ever be assets to the project. If any of them contact you again, could you kindly notify me at my talk page so that appropriate action can be taken? PCHS-NJROTC (Messages) 01:03, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

Question

You sent me a message thanking me for picture fix edit. You also commended my ability to ask questions before making blind edits. I have only asked a few questions, and I have made more edits, usually for grammar, clarity, or accuracy, but am a writer by trade. Are you being facetious? Am I changing too much? Thanks. Peacedance (talk) 01:05, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

Quite the contrary. I meant everything I said. Not too many editors stop by the editing FAQ to learn how to do something. Actually many just edit blindly. I find it quite refreshing to come across someone new that realigns an article properly, leaves an edit summary and asks questions. Cheers - 4twenty42o (talk) 01:09, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

New World Order (conspiracy theory)

I wanted to stop and let you know that I think that the article is coming along nicely. After all the drama there I decided to find a new hobby on WP. But I have been watching and I think you are doing a great job. Regards - 4twenty42o (talk) 05:19, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

Thank you and good luck with your other interests. :) --Loremaster (talk) 05:21, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

The Userpage Shield
Placed in recognition of services rendered Tiderolls 05:55, 20 November 2009 (UTC)


I appreciate the help on my user talk. Keep up the good work. Tiderolls 05:55, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

Reverted Edit

Hello. Can you kindly explain why did you revert my edit in this article. I do not find any fault in my edit, I just added info and cleaned up the infobox of the said org. Thank you. Dar book (Complains?) 13:21, 20 November 2009 (UTC)


Dear 4twenty42o,

Would it help if I would send you the digitalized versions of certificates signed by Mr Shukumine? If so I can send them. They are in Japanese. I never wanted to involve in the nonsense of mr Peter Lee. But there is a limit. I now saw thet Mr. Roering is again trying to change things for the better like he did in the past when he made a npov article about WGKF. His efforts where all diminished after mr Lee was again allowed to work on Wikipedia. He was earlier banned for a long time. Please let me know what I can do solving this. I can proof I met Mr Shukumine personally like Mr. Konno also did several times. At least it should proof the good contact between founder and Mr. Konno in the past.

B. regrds —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.217.206.15 (talk) 22:49, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

Arse

The spelling of center to centre at arse was changed as the entry refers to a book set in Britain and written by a British author. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.184.48.212 (talk) 05:36, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

Also, the word "arse" is the English version anyway. Americans use "ass," which allows for numerous donkey-related jokes. >.> --ThejadefalconSing your songThe bird's seeds 11:50, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
^^ - 4twenty42o (talk) 16:04, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

Vandalism / IrgoraJew

I noticed you have already warned User:IrgoraJew about vandalism, now I have encountered him/her vandalising Zionist_Occupation_Government and accusing users of antisemitism and vandalism for reverting his/her unconstructive edits (replacing the word 'jew' with 'zionist' throughout the article, even in quotes, book titles etc., [2]). Since these edits came after your warning, would you please do something about this user? This should at least be his/her second strike.

Since I editing WP without an account for the time being, I have no way of dealing with this, nor would I know how.

Best regards, 87.166.60.188 (talk) 19:09, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

Marcel Diallo

I have re-added Mr. Diallo's real name to the article. This time it is sourced. Please do not delete sourced material on this page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.169.160.146 (talk) 20:45, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

Re: Arthur W. V. Reeve

Hello, 4twenty42o. You have new messages at Tide rolls's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hi, cheers for putting your hand up to help out with the Arthur W. V Reeve page - unfortunatley I don't have a huge amount of time to try and make the page meet guidelines that I don't have time to read about at the moment. If you are able, please tweak the page so that its acceptable - or if you must, then delete it. It would be a shame, he is a great historical figure in New Zealand Scouting as well as New Zealand Rugby. The information I have uncovered is a byproduct of researching the St. Matthew's Scout Group in Christchurch, New Zealand - and since I found little or nothing about him on the web I felt it was worthwhile taking the time to write what I knew up for others to find - which I have done, albeit in the (seemingly) wrong way.

Cheers for you help tho

Essentialtech (talk) 02:17, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

Many thanks for your help. As to the single point of information - the stmatts.co.nz site is one I am building for their group, and the information I am taking that history from is several large boxes of troop records, newspaper clippings, and his business card. That site history is growing rapidly and is one of the things that is keeping me very busy at the moment.

References to the book he wrote can be found readily (one reference here: http://www.antiqbook.com/books/viewcat.phtml?o=tib&c=Sport+-+Rugby+Union&sf=&alpha=R), and a little more refined searching uncovers a college rugby cup he [edit] PROBABLY [/edit] donated to the Wellington Rugby Football Union (http://wrfu.co.nz/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=168&Itemid=60 - see near the end of the college rugby section).

Scouting references are harder to come by - hence why I am trying to create something to be built upon. I guess the best reference is http://www.stmatts.co.nz/a_w_v_reeve as very little (if anything) else seems to exist. I have sent some emails away to the WRFU asking what they have on the man and will also dig further into the national Scouting body here in NZ to try and uncover more in the coming week or so.

Thanks again

Steve Essentialtech (talk) 06:26, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

Sash

Hi 4twenty42o, I see I should have used the edit summary for that particular edit, but did you read the summaries for the previous two? 118.90.15.97 (talk) 05:04, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

Nazi Party

hello, there's currently a debate on the talk page about the ideology, so for the time being would you keep in the implements of both sides? Or just none at all? - BlagoCorzine2016 (talk) 22:43, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

Secret Saturdays seasons

My edits to the Secret Saturdays episode list are in accordance with the show's creator's instructions regarding the seasons. [3] Though the first person to revert my edits instructed me to search for a link on a pre-Nov 7 page where Mr. Stephens refers to the new season as the third, I was only able to find links with him talking about "the new season". Grand Commander13 (talk) 23:00, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

I understand your skepticism, but I've done my due diligence: on his own blog Jay Stephens verifies that the account Jay Stephens belongs to him. His blog is further linked to by his official site, so I don't see how you can question the toonzone account's authenticity.Grand Commander13 (talk) 23:32, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
So since, in this specific case, the source has been confirmed authentic, can the changes I made be safely restored? Playing tug-of-war with edits is not my idea of a good time, but the message has been clearly communicated from a legitimate (if not immediately obviously so) channel.Grand Commander13 (talk) 00:35, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
I would not do it but if you want to re-add it I will not revert you. Do not be suprised if someone else does.. But I have better things to do as well. - 4twenty42o (talk) 00:38, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
Well, thanks. Actually, I decided to go nuclear and check out CN's site. Go to the videos, full episodes, Season 2. Has Kur pt 1 and pt 2 there. Do you think a mention on the page of the confusion with the link as a source would stave off a re-revert?Grand Commander13 (talk) 01:21, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

WFUN (AM)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to WFUN (AM). Editing pages in such a way as to re-insert links to Geocities is not constructive if Geocities indeed is no more. I am unsure what you're trying to do here? --66.102.80.212 (talk) 02:24, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Channel 74

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Channel 74. Editing pages in such a way as to re-insert links to members.aol.com is not constructive if members.aol.com indeed is no more. I am unsure what you're trying to do here? --66.102.80.212 (talk) 02:28, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:4twenty42o/Archive_2&oldid=1144661409"