User talk:49.178.138.113

January 2021[edit]

Hi 49.178.138.113! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of an article several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. --HistoryofIran (talk) 11:14, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit Warring[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Bagram. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Adakiko (talk) 02:06, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022[edit]

Hello, I'm Cassiopeia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Askham Richard, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Cassiopeia talk 07:49, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Fentanyl. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Stop doing this. An overdose is "potentially fatal" not necessarily "fatal". You were already undone once. Either take it to the talk page per WP:BRD or leave it alone Meters (talk) 20:18, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Does Your Mother Know. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mako001 (C) (T) 11:23, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That source is a trivia site, which aren't usually reliable. It was also unnecessary trivia, so doesn't belong in the article. Mako001 (C) (T) 11:34, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. Mako001 (C) (T) 11:33, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You start with yourself.49.178.138.113 (talk) 11:35, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I can do. Might I point out though that I haven't been calling you names. I also note that you called another editor a "hypocrite", which is also not acceptable. Mako001 (C) (T) 13:00, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect there, Mako. It is acceptable especially if one is acting like this. I call a spade a spade, thanks.49.178.138.113 (talk) 13:21, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Mary Bell[edit]

She was sentenced to be detained at Her Majesty's pleasure. You might wish to be wary of the 3RR. If you wish to take this issue to the talk page, or the Teahouse, be my guest.--Kieronoldham (talk) 03:02, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Or I can be a guest of the Queen. Haha!49.178.138.113 (talk) 03:56, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

British case; British legal term.--Kieronoldham (talk) 04:35, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh. Fair enough.49.178.138.113 (talk) 06:10, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.