User talk:468SM

Welcome![edit]

Hello, 468SM, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! Ugog Nizdast (talk) 07:16, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

468SM, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi 468SM! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! Nathan2055 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:18, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014[edit]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Uwais al-Qarani, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haider^tc_s 12:01, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 26[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Al-Tughrai

added a link pointing to Compound

Alchemy and chemistry in medieval Islam

added a link pointing to Compound

Islamophobia

added a link pointing to Macedonian

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Saadi Shirazi, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Ugog Nizdast (talk) 06:27, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

pics[edit]

Your files at commons have be nominated for deletion Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Yusuf_ibn_Abd_al-Rahman_al-Mizzi.jpg as copyright violations They are nice images but you are not the copy right holder J8079s (talk) 05:26, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 3[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Islam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Crimean Tatar. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

deletion request[edit]

These have been nominated for deletion https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Yusuf_ibn_Abd_al-Rahman_al-Mizzi.jpg:

You are not the copy right holder to release them please fix the files. 05:21, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for your effort to fix this. They are still wrong. If you search at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Welcome you will find that at least some of these images are already in there. J8079s (talk) 23:38, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014[edit]

Your recent editing history at Islam shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. DeCausa (talk) 06:15, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your image was inserted successfully on the page Astronomy in medieval Islam, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. please respond on talk page J8079s (talk) 16:04, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Changes on Hinduism[edit]

Are you serious? Connecting Indus Valley civilization with Hinduism remains very controversial and is often claimed by Hindu nationalists without substantial evidence but how we can consider John Marshall, Gregory L. Possehl, and many others who consider Pashupati Seal as the depiction of Shiva to be Hindu nationalists? Bladesmulti (talk) 00:26, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Gundestrup Cauldron also looks like the Indus River Valley seal it does not prove anything. There are many in the archaeological community who disagree and are skeptical about the theories of John Marshall and Gregory L. Possehl don't forget. 468SM (talk) 11:02, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Using Gundestrup Cauldron as an excuse is just irrelevant. We believe in citations, not your views. Tomorrow if you claim that World trade center looks like Taj Mahal, we will require reliable citations for that, and not your nonsensical view. See Wikipedia:Verify. Those who disagree with the view of majority that Pashupati Seal is depiction of Shiva also confirms that it is usually accepted. E.g., Herbert Sullivan who disagreed with Marshall says that Marshall theory "has been accepted almost universally and has greatly influenced scholarly understanding"... [1]. Bladesmulti (talk) 11:37, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Hinduism shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Bladesmulti (talk) 11:37, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 11[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ghulam Husain Tabatabai, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages English, Mughal and Persian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indus Valley Civilization[edit]

There are a ton of top western scholars that link IVC to Hinduism or Vedism. You can read page 28 of Kiss of the Yogini.VictoriaGrayson^Talk 20:05, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 19[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mughal Empire, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Horde. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:33, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nawab Muhammad Bahadur Khanji[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nawab Muhammad Bahadur Khanji requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ochilov (talk) 08:27, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It is notable.[2] Bladesmulti (talk) 09:33, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 26[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Battle of Manipur (1748)

added a link pointing to Mughal

Khafi Khan

added a link pointing to Indian

Muin ul-Mulk (Mir Mannu)

added a link pointing to Shah Nawaz Khan

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 16:50, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mughal Empire[edit]

Hi @468SM: Reverting extensive changes to last good version is not Vandalism on Wikipedia. Please discuss your extensive changes in Mughal Empire Talk page. Nestwiki (talk) 17:00, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

explain why u are reverting? --468SM (talk) 17:17, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@468SM:: Please discuss your extensive changes in Mughal Empire Talk page.Nestwiki (talk) 17:23, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mir Hasan Khan[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mir Hasan Khan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ...William 13:06, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 2[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Amir Beg

added links pointing to Mughal and Persian

Shah Alam II

added links pointing to Jamuna and Vazir

Muhammad Shah

added a link pointing to Daud Khan

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Mughal Lohar (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mike V • Talk 16:50, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]