User talk:Olaide Ogunjobi

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:3CHUBBML)

3CHUBBML, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi 3CHUBBML! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: User:3CHUBBML/sandbox has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:3CHUBBML/sandbox. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 17:24, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021[edit]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of name and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions other than promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must:

  • Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
  • Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
  • Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.
Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page.

Cullen328 Let's discuss it 19:00, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Olaide Ogunjobi (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

What is the way out of this?

Decline reason:

This is explained literally right above this unblock request. Yamla (talk) 19:16, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{connected contributor (paid)}

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Olaide Ogunjobi (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Request reason:

All guild shall be observe

Decline reason:

Your choice of new username is not acceptable. Please review the username policy. You will need to review the policies described in the block notice and demonstrate your understanding of them by telling us what you intend to edit about, as you won't be unblocked to edit about your company. If that's your only goal here, there is nothing more to do here. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 19:46, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Olaide Ogunjobi (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Request reason:

Doing all I can Have check the availability of this username, it can be use. The article will be edited all promotional content will be remove.Please unblock my IP.

Decline reason:

Duplicate request. 331dot (talk) 20:37, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What do you have to do with the User talk:TransparentAfrica account? 331dot (talk) 20:20, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And your new username is still not acceptable. 331dot (talk) 20:25, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Olaide Ogunjobi (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Request reason:

I never giveup on this

Decline reason:

duplicate and inadequate --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:15, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you do not start answering questions and propose a proper username, I will remove your ability to edit this page. 331dot (talk) 20:38, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Olaide Ogunjobi (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Request reason:

Paid-contribution requirement will be strictly followed.I understood better now why I was blocked, all measures will be taken to ensure it does not repeat itself.I will ensure all promotional statements are removed.

Decline reason:

duplicate. insufficient --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:17, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

3CHUBBML (talk) 21:21, 3 February 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Once again, what is your relationship to TransparentAfrica? Pahunkat (talk) 22:18, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That was the initial username that are was intended to be used, though confused on the choice of username but it was available to be use at that time.


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Olaide Ogunjobi (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Have stated above, please unblock my IP.

Decline reason:

See User talk:TRANSPARENT BRAND. We don't like the deception. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 15:24, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You have three open unblock requests; you only need one. Please combine them into a single request; if you make additional comment, you can just write it as a regular comment without making it an unblock request. "Gadget" is taken as a username, you will need to choose something else. 331dot (talk) 08:51, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What about Transparent?

No. Please choose a name that reflects that a specific individual is exclusively operating this account. Something like "Username of TA". 331dot (talk) 15:33, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What about Olaide Ogunjobi?

That appears to be the real name of an information technology consultant in Nigeria? Theroadislong (talk) 17:34, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That is my real name, Olaide Ogunjobi

globally renamed 3CHUBBML to Olaide Ogunjobi. Unblock?[edit]

globally renamed 3CHUBBML to Olaide Ogunjobi. Deferring unblock to @Cullen328: --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:20, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I want to remind the editor that Wikipedia is not a place for any type of promotion. I do not object to an unblock as long as that is understood, Deepfriedokra. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 15:40, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
What happened about the sockpuppetry? and User:TransparentAfrica.Theroadislong (talk) 15:55, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Eeeewwww! Thanks, @Theroadislong:. Now, opposed to unblocking per JPGordon above. I would be opposed to any unblock that allowed editing about 3CHUBBML or TRANSPARENT BRAND. @Olaide Ogunjobi: This seems to be a problem-- "User:TRANSPARENT BRAND/sandbox (←Created page with (redacted) It is a fashion brand under the (redacted) company in Nigeria. Its young and fashionable brand makes it more and more popular. Today's mobile phone is mor...')". You were blocked on the third. TRANSPARENT BRAND began requesting unblock on the fifth. They were blocked in August, and their spam page was deleted. So you are either them or working with them or for the same client. TBH, if I'd noticed the socking, I'd've declined the rename. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:45, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]