User talk:2RDD

Jxmmi[edit]

Hello, thank you for creating the above mentioned draft, as I've previously created it and left it to rot it is still on my watchlist. Jxmmi was not featured on "Throw Sum Mo" and other listed recordings as he is the primary artist as a member of Rae Sremmurd, and would please not overlink names, if you already mentioned Mike Will Made It before please don't link it again because as much as your draft is promising it might not get accepted and might require clean up first. Otherwise, good job. dxneo (talk) 00:33, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And you don't have to mention every song he was featured on, only breakthrough songs like "No Flex Zone" and "No Type" will do, you may mention studio albums. Featured songs can be listed under the discography section

Thank you dxneo (talk) 00:36, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Slim Jxmmi (January 13)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Rae Sremmurd. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft is for a title that was previously an article, but was then cut down to a redirect. If this draft is accepted, the history should be preserved. Do not tag the redirect for G6.

Reviewers should check the history and verify whether there was a consensus to cut the article down to a redirect, or whether the action was taken boldly without discussion. If there was a consensus for the cutdown, do not accept this draft without verifying that the draft improves the article or that consensus has changed. If in doubt, please discuss.

See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slim Jxmmi, and a history of questionable recreation.

This draft is a draft on a subtopic of an existing article, Rae Sremmurd. Discussion as to whether a separate article for the subtopic is warranted should be on the talk page of the parent article, Talk:Rae Sremmurd.

Please discuss the suitability of creating a separate subtopic article on the talk page of the parent article. Please resubmit this draft if there is rough consensus at the parent talk page to create the child article, or with an explanation that the child draft satisfies either general notability on its own or a special notability guide..

This title is a locked redirect, and will require admin action to unlock, or to accept this draft, so a very strong case will need to be made for acceptance of this draft.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Slim Jxmmi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 07:59, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Robert McClenon, I happen to disagree with you on the subject not being suitable for a standalone article due to no SIGCOV and such, see this and tell me if it's just "passing mention(s)". He has been the subject of multiple independent news articles here, here, here, here, and probably more since I can't cite the whole internet. I like feel you judged the draft based on its previously AFD'd article. I strongly urge you to reconsider, I'll be on the lookout for your response

Thank you. dxneo (talk) 10:58, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 2RDD! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 07:59, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Zerry DL[edit]

Hello 2RDD, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Zerry DL, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zerry DL.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Vanderwaalforces}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 01:40, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Vanderwaalforces: Okay, cool. Y'all should discuss the issue, If it's delete then delete and if it's to Keep then keep it. I humble myself because you all are better then me here.. Thank You.. I will keep improving.. 2RDD (talk) 07:43, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Neville Records[edit]

Hello 2RDD, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Neville Records, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neville Records.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Vanderwaalforces}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 19:11, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Tochi Bright Clement [edit]

Hi 2RDDD, please I need help understanding why an article (Draft:Tochi Bright Clement) I submitted for review has been in process for the past 12 hours. Please I need you to check it out for me please. Thank you for your time. Greybliss (talk) 03:27, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Greybliss: That draft need to be deleted; it is full of promotions and primary sources. Pls do not write about yourself which may generate conflict of interest. The draft Is now marked for deletion and it may be marked for non-creation again. I suggest you leave the article and study the rules and regulations on Wikipedia. Thank You! And Secondly, why did you use its real name? You suppose to create with stage name..2RDD (talk) 10:46, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2RDD

Thank you for the advice. Plus I created the draft in my sandbox, it was moved to this page by a bot admin when I submitted it for review Greybliss (talk) 12:59, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024[edit]

Hello 2RDD. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:2RDD. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=2RDD|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Various articles. Your very first edit clearly do not look like a very first edit either. Graywalls (talk) 19:26, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I do not receive payments for my edits please, I'm here only to contribute to Wikipedia; Thank You! And God Bless You!!! @Graywalls 2RDD (talk) 07:54, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Plutomania Records for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Plutomania Records is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plutomania Records until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Graywalls (talk) 00:53, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]