User talk:2A02:C7F:489F:4B00:B85B:6454:FFCC:9F5A

September 2019

Hello, I'm Redrose64. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 15:47, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

Moved from User talk:Redrose64 § Ambassadors of death - Latest Episode with no living actors

 – --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 17:20, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

Ambassadors of death - Latest Episode with no living actors

There is no citation. It is original research. I have visited every single likely page on each episode of Classic Doctor Who on IMDB. Where the dates of death are not quoted I have checked out Wikipedia, BFI, Spotlight (I am a member) and other related sources, and have by dint of hard work, discoved the fact that every subsequent episode contains at least one living actor. There cannot be a citation as there is no other source other than what I have done.

However these facts are true, as are other items such as oldest living actor to ever appear in Doctor Who, or Doctor Who actors who have appeared in the most Sci-Fi franchises etc. How would you suggest I proceed? Put the information on another site then quote it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7F:489F:4B00:B85B:6454:FFCC:9F5A (talk) 16:36, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

Original research is not allowed; that is one of our core content policies, another of which is that of verifiability. In short: somebody else must have done the research and published it in a reliable source before it may be mentioned here. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 17:24, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

---