User talk:24.4.147.8

Unregistered editors using this IP address received messages on this talk page years ago. Since users of the IP address have likely changed, these messages have been removed. They can be viewed in the page history.

October 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm BilCat. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Boeing 747SP, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 22:06, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2024[edit]

Hello, I'm Danners430. I noticed that you recently removed content from List of high-speed trains without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Danners430 (talk) 09:53, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Short Bus—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 05:43, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Short Bus. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 05:47, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Nanjing–Xi'an railway, you may be blocked from editing. MolecularPilot (talk) 06:57, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kumon. ZLEA _T\^C 21:30, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Codename Noreste 🤔 talk 00:40, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at US Airways. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. JeffSpaceman (talk) 18:01, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. ~ SG5536B (talkpage | contribs) 08:05, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Leon103102 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Leon103102. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Spicy (talk) 01:10, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

24.4.147.8 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have tried to email the Arbitration Committee on having me unbanned and none have worked so far so my only choice was to return to editing after 2 years. 24.4.147.8 (talk) 04:26, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Evading your block to appeal a block for (in part) evading your block is never a good strategy. If ArbCom will not hear you, there is nothing that we can do for you until you cease and desist all Wikipedia editing for at least six months and then appeal from your original account. If you are unwilling to do this, there is nothing further to discuss. 331dot (talk) 08:22, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Non-admin comment: Evading your block imposed on your original account (User:Leon103102) by any method (i.e. via creating new accounts or IP while logged out) is strictly against Wikipedia's policies per WP:SOCK and I'm 100% sure you already know that. Continuing to create multiple accounts or editing anonymously while evading blocks will not help inch you closer to an unblock by one step and you would just face even more serious consequences. By persistently socking using so many IPs and making more than 10 accounts, you already destoryed all of the community's trust. Community trust is a crucial thing that is very hard to put back together once it is broken. Furthermore, as per the multiple block notices you received on a number of your sockpuppet account/IP talk pages, "any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted." - That is exactly why many of us (including me) have been reverting most of your edits made from you while evading bans to this encyclopedia. You were told in 2021 that emailing the Arbitration Committee via your original account was your only avenue of appeal; yet you refused to listen, went to make more silly/unserious requests via your sockpuppets, and from 2023, go back to abusively creating more accounts and using IPs to continue engaing in sockpuppetry. If you continue doing so, there's absolutely no reason for any of us to trust you here at all and this may even be the end of the road for your editing journey in Wikipedia. ~ SG5536B (talk) 09:09, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

24.4.147.8 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I went six or so months without editing in August–January 2021 and that never worked. 24.4.147.8 (talk) 06:54, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is not an unblock request. Yamla (talk) 11:48, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

That in and of itself will not get you unblocked, but it is needed as a sign of good faith that you are willing to abide by policies and instructions- you still need to adequately address the underlying reasons for the block. Evading your block definitely will not work, but if that's what you have chosen to do, we are all just wasting our time here. 331dot (talk) 08:23, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Non-admin comment: Also with your account also being confirmed to This User and This User (per report) at your Sockpuppet casepage with such 'edits' from those two accounts, strongly makes it very difficult to believe that you're here to build an encyclopedia. Coastie43 (talk) 13:59, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.