User talk:221.145.211.23

September 2018[edit]

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Black Kite (talk) 08:38, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Which poor sources did I use -- I referenced all the sources : they are from the mainstream press and tweets made by the people themselves. I have back upped all my contributions with webpage links -- check them.

I've fixed the Rhodes page with a neutral section using inline citations (which you didn't use). You can't use op-ed pieces in the Gammon article to attack people, that's simply a BLP violation, and previous discussions on that page have backed that one up. I'm going to look at the Schneider page now. Black Kite (talk) 08:55, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Who did I attack in the gammon article? Are you imagining things? You are defaming me.

You are using opinion pieces which accuse living people of being racist. It's not happening - sorry. Black Kite (talk) 08:59, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Which living person was accused of being racist? Specifically show me the line in which a living person is labeled as a racist? If you mean the line referring to 'corbynites', that is not corbyn himself.

A number of the quotes are obvious nonsensical attempts to link the term to Jeremy Corbyn and his supporters, when the term was basically a social media meme. We don't include stuff like this as it's a BLP issue, if we're also discussing whether the term is racist. We can include some opinion from those who claim it is, but then we'd also have to include all the op-ed pieces that claim it isn't. It was simply easier - as the article does - to include a sentence saying that there was a controversy about it. Black Kite (talk) 09:08, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add defamatory content, as you did at Rhodes Must Fall. —AE (talk • contributions) 09:07, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

What defamatory content did I make at Rhodes must fall? Identify it. Or, I will report you. Note that. I will report the two of you.

"A number of the quotes are obvious nonsensical attempts to link the term to Jeremy Corbyn and his supporters,"

A number of quotes? Really? You claim a 'number of quotes" -- Make sure you identify them as such, I am waiting. I will report you. Note that. A corbynite is NOT corbyn. It seems you can't grasp that.

/* University of Oxford */ ALL of the information I have added on the Rhodes pages IS TRUE to SOURCE. And all the sources are LEGIT -- THE GUARDIAN et al -- STOP messing with these edits stop vandalizing the page for your own ideological purposes. I am not stating MY OPINIONS, i am reporting press coverage.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, or if you add text from a copyrighted source, as you did at Rhodes Must Fall. Black Kite (talk) 10:33, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit-warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. User:Ymblanter (talk) 11:24, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.