User talk:20th c violin concerto

Welcome![edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, 20th c violin concerto! Thank you for your contributions. I am I dream of horses and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{Ping|I dream of horses}} to your message. (talk to me) (contributions) @ 00:17, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Gerald Walenn[edit]

Hi, I'm I dream of horses. 20th c violin concerto, thanks for creating Gerald Walenn!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add categories. Thanks.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{Ping|I dream of horses}} to your message. (talk to me) (contributions) @ 10:12, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I dream of horses! I hope I answer this correctly, I am not familiar with this editing yet. I checked the Gerlad Walenn and Bruce Steane websites and made some changes to the references. I hope that is now fine, otherwise I do not understand what "linkrot" (or was it "rotlink") is. In that case please tell me what I have to do. One other question: I already made an article 3 weeks ago as an unregistered user, when I now wanted to do the same it was not possible and so I created an account. So my first "unregistered" article still exists only as a draft, but my articles from yesterday and today are already online. How can I bring my first article online as well? It is the one "Draft:Phyllis_Gummer"? Thanks and best wishes, Tobias @I dream of horses:

Phyllis Gummer[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Phyllis Gummer, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.tobias-broeker.de/rare-manuscripts/phyllis-gummer-archive/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:43, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Phyllis Gummer[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Phyllis Gummer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.tobias-broeker.de/rare-manuscripts/phyllis-gummer-archive/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:04, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Phyllis Gummer[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Phyllis Gummer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.tobias-broeker.de/rare-manuscripts/phyllis-gummer-archive/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Diannaa (talk) 03:04, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

References[edit]

Hi. Please read the guidelines at Wikipedia:References dos and don'ts. Deb (talk) 22:46, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Hugo Käch[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Hugo Käch requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.tobias-broeker.de/rare-manuscripts/g-l/k%C3%A4ch-hugo/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. power~enwiki (π, ν) 04:58, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Enrico Terni[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Enrico Terni requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.tobias-broeker.de/rare-manuscripts/s-z/terni-enrico/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. power~enwiki (π, ν) 04:59, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Henri Ploquin[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Henri Ploquin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.unsungcomposers.com/forum/index.php?topic=6664.0. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. power~enwiki (π, ν) 05:01, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reply[edit]

Hi, thanks for message. It's not quite as simple as that.

The articles were copyright violations. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. The copied site was marked © Tobias Broeker . We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial, but there is no indication that the copied site allows free use. Text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here, or you could simply relabel your site as explicitly public domain for anyone to use. Please note that just asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient, since it contradicts what the website says. We often restore deleted text on request, but for legal reasons we don't do so for copyright violations.

Another problem is that you did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that your musicians meet the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to you, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what you claim. Your own website is clearly not an independent third-party source, and in the absence of any indication of where you got your information from, it looks like original research, whereas we need published sources.

I realise that you are acting in good faith, and these musicians may well be notable, but effectively you will have to either write non-copyright text (not just a close paraphrase) or release your website text as PD or CC BY-SA 3.0 licensed so we can use it here, and find published sources for the facts independent of you.

If you have any queries, ask on my talk page Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:07, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 8[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ben Weber (composer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Shaw (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Tobias Broeker[edit]

Hello, 20th c violin concerto,

Thanks for creating Tobias Broeker! I edit here too, under the username Doomsdayer520 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Thank you for your new article on Tobias Broeker.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 21:24, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Igor Krivokapič[edit]

Hello 20th c violin concerto,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Igor Krivokapič for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:38, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Max Kästl[edit]

Hello, 20th c violin concerto,

Thank you for creating Max Kästl.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please add clear references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 18:13, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:46, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tobias Broeker[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tobias Broeker, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 82.173.133.70 (talk) 20:38, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Zur Kenntnisnahme, nunmehr in der Löschprüfung! Grüße, Uwe Martens (talk) 01:50, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tobias Broeker for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tobias Broeker is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tobias Broeker until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Sandstein 11:44, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, 20th c violin concerto. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Tobias Broeker, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 16:55, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tristan Foison for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tristan Foison is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tristan Foison until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DanCherek (talk) 02:39, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfD question[edit]

Hi, I notice that you've nominated several articles for deletion via the AfD process, but there seems to be something wrong with the way that's done — are you following the instructions at WP:AFDHOWTO exactly?

A second, related question: why are you nominating articles you've created yourself? No reason why you can't; I just don't see why you'd want to? --DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:01, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Its a bit odd, since they didn't include the fact of their being the author while nominating the article, that is done in such cases normally. ☆★Mamushir (✉✉) 21:26, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Third opinion request[edit]

Hi 20th c violin concerto, and thank you for seeking out a third opinion. I am declining your request because:

There has been no talk page discussion of the issues. The third opinion page guidelines say: "Before making a request here, be sure that the issue has been thoroughly discussed on the article talk page. 3O is only for assistance in resolving disagreements that have come to a standstill."
The third opinion page exists to resolve content disputes. Your request seemed mainly to be a complaint about conduct. You may want to read WP:CONDUCTDISPUTE for advice on next steps.

Thanks, Firefangledfeathers (talk) 15:42, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 16:39, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

20th c violin concerto (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The links I placed led to an non-profit archive that provided unique scores for free to all users of the internet world wide - like IMSLP. So why is that so bad to be blocked for lifetime? 20th c violin concerto (talk) 17:07, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are blocked indefinitely, not for a lifetime. You need to address the concerns around WP:COI and WP:SPAM. Yamla (talk) 17:37, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

How and where do I "address the concerns around WP:COI and WP:SPAM"?? 17:40, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Read WP:COI and WP:SPAM and, right here, explain how you do or do not have a conflict of interest, and, perhaps more importantly, show your understanding of why the dozens of links to that archive you've been inserting were treated as WP:SPAM. Really, it didn't matter what the links were -- that specific behavior, repeated insertion of links to an external website, would have triggered a block pretty much automatically. Almost all the time, such insertions are attempts to spam Wikipedia, so all sorts of alarms go off. Another thing that might set of alarms is that your handle is "20th c violin concerto", and the page title on the site you've linked to is "20th c violin concertante", so an observer might wonder if there is indeed a WP:COI here. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 18:42, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your answer and the hints. Indeed I am the owner of that website and the links refer to my work. Is that not allowed? If the Library of Congress make a publication and update their Wiki-entry themselves - is that spam too? The thing is that all musicians that would like to perform unpublished music by Carlos Veerhoff, Jacques Chailley, Claude Pascal or Jan Broekhuis (all composer with a Wiki entry) need to contact me because I own all to very much of the musical autographs of these composers. Therefore I thought and still think that this information is of importance for a Wikipedia entry (like there are similar references to such archives at National Libraries). Of course I can ask someone else to put that information into Wiki, but how absurd is that? Then I can make it myself as well. And so I did. The problem is that some Wiki guy here has to take a few minutes more to check the situation and some sort of knowledge about classical music would be of help. Just doing what you described: Check 20 seconds my entries, my name and website title and then block me all the way - that behaviour does not satisfy the situation in my opinion. 20th c violin concerto (talk) 19:29, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I would just like to point out that promoting your own website, not just by posting links to it, but by saying things like "Scores of both Violin concertos, the Concerto grosso and the Symphonic Rhapsody are freely accessible via the publication project of Tobias Bröker", was not the only disruption you engaged in. You edit-warred with another user when they removed your spam links. You filed a bogus report against the other user at WP:ANEW. You filed for a WP:3O not because you wanted to resolve a content dispute but because you again wanted to complain about the other user; the request was declined. You removed CSD tags for articles you had created. You created an autobiography, Tobias Broeker. Spam may be a major component of the block, but it's not the only one.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:51, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If my website and the information on it is not good enough for Wikipedia, then I would like to have "my information" removed from all the Wikipedia articles. For example the Jan Broekhuis article has a worklist - where is the reference to this? The information seems to be good enough for the article but not a reference to my wwebsite (where I did all the work to create a worklist of Jan Broekhuis). So to complete your disliking of my activities I would prefer to delete such information as well. Or on the other hand if the information is good, the reference to the source of that information (my website) must be included. And in that case the reference I placed was fine. I assume you stand on your point, therefore how can unreferenced information that is my intellectual property be removed from the Wiki pages? 20th c violin concerto (talk) 20:04, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You might wish to read WP:TOS; you give up a lot of "rights" when you edit Wikipedia. That said, what you're saying demonstrates your lack of knowledge about how Wikipedia works and confirms that a major purpose of your edits is to promote yourself and your work. In the case of the Broekhuis article, the list of his works is unsourced. It may in fact be removed because it is unsourced, but the fact that you "know" it to be true because of your own research is irrelevant; it is called WP:OR. In addition, the inclusion of that material does not violate any so-called intellectual property rights you have. I may not respond anymore to your comments as they just validate the correctness of the block.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:23, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jan Broekhuis moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Jan Broekhuis, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:50, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Let me explain you the problem here: I am the holder of the main archive of the composer Jan Broekhuis. That includes not only the music manuscripts, but also private letters and photos, his old passports, tax statements, etc. And I published all the information in a finding aid on my website and also published several of the previously unpublished compositions by Jan Broekhuis on my website. All information and all scores are available for free (and my website is also ad-free, so a non-profit project). Therefore I placed references to information in the article that led to my website, but the problem is that I am a private person. Therefore some guys here saw my activity as self-promotion. I can understand why they thought this way, but how will someone make references about Jan Broekhuis without refering to the main archive? So I thought this was a big misunderstanding and re-did my "self-promotion". That ended in my ban of editing. So if you wish to improve the article and make references you have to do it on your own. Maybe you find my website useful for making references: https://www.tobias-broeker.de/rare-manuscripts/a-f/broekhuis-jan/ Best wishes! 20th c violin concerto (talk) 08:27, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

20th c violin concerto (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked in 2021 for placing links on composer's articles to my website. I am doing this because I am a preserver of many musical estates of composers. And I put such links into the Wikipedia articles of composers of which I own large parts of their musical estate. This is similar to let the Library of Congress put a link to themselves because they own the estate of XY - which should be OK I assume. I do own such estates for composers like Henri Martelli, Jacques Chailley, Carlos Veerhoff, Jan Broekhuis and some others. After being blocked nearly 2 years ago another user improved the article of one of these composers. That was the article of Jan Broekhuis. Due to the fact that I own the complete estate of Jan Broekhuis it was necessary for this user to give references to my website - because there is no other serious source! Not the Dutch National Library holds this estate but me. So a reference to my website is necessary because I provide specific information other sources cannot give. I understand that self-promotion is banned here, but do I really have to wait for a bloke who puts the links to my website into Wikipedia and that I cannot do it myself? 20th c violin concerto (talk) 21:12, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Wikipedia is here to be an encyclopedia, not to advertise a user's website for their profit. Furthermore, adding links to your website is against Wikipedia's WP:COI policy, so this would need to be addressed in your unblock request. In your unblock request, you will need to demonstrate that you understand what you were blocked, describe how you will avoid this mistake in the future, and outline what kinds of edits you will make to articles should you be unblocked. Z1720 (talk) 01:09, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.