User talk:204.185.77.119

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Toilet paper has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. The New Mikemoral ♪♫ 03:56, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The project's content policies require that all articles be written from a neutral point of view, and not introduce bias or give undue weight to viewpoints. Please bear this in mind when making edits such as your recent edit to Alberto Cutié. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 02:11, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April 28[edit]

elcome to Wikipedia. The project's content policies require that all articles be written from a neutral point of view, and not introduce bias or give undue weight to viewpoints. Please bear this in mind when making edits such as your recent edit to Jim Suttle and Elden Francis Curtiss. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you.

December 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Madison, Missouri, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Madison, Missouri was changed by 204.185.77.119 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2010-12-01T20:41:13+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 20:41, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013[edit]

Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions to Michael Owen Jackels has been reverted or removed, because it contains speculative or unconfirmed information about a future event. Please only add material about future events if it is verifiable, based on a reference to a reliable source. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 21:38, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Michael Owen Jackels. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 21:40, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Michael Owen Jackels, you may be blocked from editing. I would encourage you to refer to the talk page and engage in discussion and review my previous research rather than edit-warring. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 21:50, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


I have provided below the relevant excerpts from Canon Law, and your claim is not contained in it. As you can see, it is expressly controverted by the first line: the previous diocese becomes vacant upon canonical possession of the new one.

http://www.intratext.com/ixt/ENG0017/_P1G.HTM
Can. 418 §1 Within two months of receiving certain notification of transfer, the Bishop must proceed to the diocese to which he has been transferred and take canonical possession of it. On the day on which he takes possession of the new diocese, the diocese from which he has been transferred becomes vacant.
§2 In the period between receiving certain notification of the transfer and taking possession of the new diocese, in the diocese from which he is being transferred the Bishop:
1° has the power, and is bound by the obligations, of a diocesan Administrator; all powers of the Vicar general and of the episcopal Vicar cease, without prejudice to can. 409 §2;
http://www.intratext.com/ixt/ENG0017/_P1D.HTM
Can. 382 §1 A person who is promoted to the episcopate cannot become involved in the exercise of the office entrusted to him before he has taken canonical possession of the diocese. However, he is able to exercise offices which he already held in the same diocese at the time of his promotion, without prejudice to can. 409 §2.
§2 Unless he is lawfully impeded, one who is not already consecrated a Bishop and is now promoted to the office of diocesan Bishop, must take canonical possession of his diocese within four months of receiving the apostolic letters. If he is already consecrated, he must take possession within two months of receiving the apostolic letters.
§3 A Bishop takes canonical possession of his diocese when, personally or by proxy, he shows the apostolic letters to the college of consultors, in the presence of the chancellor of the curia, who makes a record of the fact. This must take place within the diocese. In dioceses which are newly established he takes possession when he communicates the same letters to the clergy and the people in the cathedral church, with the senior of the priests present making a record of the fact.
§4 It is strongly recommended that the taking of canonical possession be performed with a liturgical act in the cathedral church, in the presence of the clergy and the people.
Elizium23 (talk) 21:52, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your help desk question[edit]

You have responses.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 21:47, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]