User talk:195.113.8.138

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but I highly recommend that you create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (195.113.8.138) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! Abductive (reasoning) 17:44, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism[edit]

Hi, What you're labeling 'vandalism' in regards to the Horten Ho 229 seems to me to be good-faith editing. Please discuss your differences on the article's talk page in the future - edit warring and name calling is unhelpful. Cheers, Nick-D (talk) 10:12, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Can you produce any link when I labeled something vandalism. I don't deny your right for a subjective opinion, but I can't share it - removing of maintenance templates without dealing with the problem (or without any explanation for such removal) is hardly a good-faith edit. Thank you.--195.113.8.138 (talk) 14:33, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Sure: here (edit summary of 'rvv') and here (use of a tool to label the edit you were reverting vandalism). Nick-D (talk) 23:37, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ooops-. Still you haven't produce any proof that these were 'a good faith edits' as the users were removing a maintenance template without solving the problem (and sometimes without any explanation at all). Thank you-.--195.113.8.138 (talk) 10:19, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm 72. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to List of presidential qualifications by country— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —72 talk / contribs 13:58, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2022[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Angus Roxburgh—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 17:25, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Llammakey. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Ropucha-class landing ship have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Llammakey (talk) 20:56, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:195.113.8.138&oldid=1210275304"