User talk:193.25.183.52

With reference to the edits you performed on Jim Clark Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. M100 11:21, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User suspected of being Pfanzgarten as the disruptive edits appear identical.

This IP has now popped up again, vandalising the exact same article just over a month since the first time you had a go. Have you really got nothing better to do than wreck the article on Jim Clark?

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Jim Clark, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you.

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing in Jim Clark. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. —Wknight94 (talk) 19:53, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008[edit]

Hi, the recent edit you made to Jim Clark has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Marlith (Talk) 17:46, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Jim Clark. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution.

Hi Pflanzgarten - I know you'll ignore this, but please do discuss your change. Jimmy will always be the greatest ever for me as well, but my opinion isn't encyclopaedic fact any more than anyone else's. -- Ian Dalziel (talk) 22:49, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Saint George has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. » skraz ^{talk,contribs} 10:32, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Jim Clark. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. NawlinWiki (talk) 17:00, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case[edit]

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Pflanzgarten for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Baseball Watcher 23:24, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012[edit]

Hello, I'm TruPepitoM. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Philippe Starck because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. TruPepitoM Talk To Me 10:55, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2017[edit]

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Kyle Walker-Peters, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 19:26, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.