User talk:192.167.204.15

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia! You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but you may wish to create an account. It is free, requires no personal information, and provides many benefits. Your IP address will no longer be visible to other users, and you will be able to:

Feel free to ask me any questions you may have on my talk page. By the way, remember to sign and date your comments with four tildes (~~~~). Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 03:42, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vulgar Latin[edit]

"weren't it different from classical latin there would be no specific article"

I would like to point out, that this is probably the first attempt ever to prove a scientific hypothesis by adducing the existence of a Wikipedia article as an argument. Unfortunately, the existence of the specific article in wiki, or its contents, does not prove anything about the features of Vulgar Latin, for that the Vulgar Latin is different from the classical Latin, is only a hypothesis, not a fact.

And, by the way, it is always good to take a look a the discussion page before doing blind reverts. You're editing the caption, and you don't know, that the image itself is about to be removed. Mamurra (talk) 16:28, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

1. You thought that it is obvious, but it is not. 2. For "edere", you are wrong. This word is not used before Tertullian, and so it does not exist in classical Latin, as the table requires. 3. Looking up discussion pages is useful to become aware of reasons for editorial decisions. 4. You edit Vulgar Latin once more against the evidence provided by Thesaurus Linguae Latinae, and I report your action to the relevant place as vandalism. Mamurra (talk) 13:31, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]