User talk:188.29.164.232

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Recent edit to Soha Ali Khan[edit]

Information icon Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Soha Ali Khan, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 14:34, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015[edit]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for evading a previous block. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:02, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017[edit]

Hello, I'm StarmanW. I noticed that in this edit to Category:Candidates for speedy deletion, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ๐’ฎ๐“‰๐’ถ๐“‡๐“‚๐’ถ๐“ƒ ๐’ฒ 09:17, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kokutai. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Kokutai was changed by 188.29.164.232 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.857421 on 2017-10-14T09:17:41+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:17, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Eynort, you may be blocked from editing. ๐’ฎ๐“‰๐’ถ๐“‡๐“‚๐’ถ๐“ƒ ๐’ฒ 09:19, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you blank out or remove content from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to U.S. Repeating Arms Company. ๐’ฎ๐“‰๐’ถ๐“‡๐“‚๐’ถ๐“ƒ ๐’ฒ 09:20, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ย MER-C 09:31, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

188.29.164.232 (block log โ€ข active blocks โ€ข global blocks โ€ข contribs โ€ข deleted contribs โ€ข filter log โ€ข creation log โ€ข change block settings โ€ข unblock โ€ข checkuser (log))


Request reason:

DO NOT DECLINE THIS UNBLOCK REQUEST!!!!!!!''

Decline reason:

Just did, and revoked your talk page privileges while I was at it. Favonian (talk) 10:30, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@MER-C: UNBLOCK ME NOW!!!!!!!

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

188.29.164.232 (block log โ€ข active blocks โ€ข global blocks โ€ข contribs โ€ข deleted contribs โ€ข filter log โ€ข creation log โ€ข change block settings โ€ข unblock โ€ข checkuser (log))


Request reason:

This IP address is part of a range of IP addresses used for carrier NAT by 3 UK, a national mobile and broadband operator with over 10 million users. Like many mobile operators, 3 UK assigns subscribers at random to a range of NAT IPs on a rotating basis, and there is no correlation between a particular IP and any individual subscriber (although there may be a correlation between a NAT IP and a regional network controller). Actual vandals would easily evade this block by cycling their mobile phone/broadband terminal into airplane mode and off again whereas genuine contributors are blocked from making legitimate edits (The block on this IP appears to affect me even when I am logged in with my user account, which contradicts the information given on the Help:I have been blocked page.)

Decline reason:

This specific IP has been used for block evasion for several years and is hard blocked to prevent further disruption. The entire 188.29.128.0/17 range is also globally blocked due to vandalism, though only to anonymous users. You can cycle to another IP (which you note yourself is easy to do) however you will only be able to edit while logged in due to the global range block. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 17:26, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.