User talk:183.83.146.190

June 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Sanjay Kapoor has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Sanjay Kapoor was changed by 183.83.146.190 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.962506 on 2014-06-27T08:45:45+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:45, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

R-73 Missile

Please stop your disruptive behaviour on R-73 missile page. You should know that on wikipedia we rely on credible sources to add content. We don't use personal commentary to the page. The wording used on the page should also resemble the one that is used in the source. Otherwise it is violation of No original research rule. 82.178.61.254 (talk) 12:02, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

Look at the page; I am not inserting the part about fake images. I am giving credible sources to balance what you said, and removed some of the fake things you inserted. Please stop your nationalistic vandalism. 183.83.146.190 (talk) 12:08, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

The only source that you added is from 2020. Do check the dates. Theweek.in is talking about the new pictures that were released in 2020. So do you think it is constructive to add that source in front of the pictures that were released in 2019? Plus you are adding stuff like 'some locals' when the sources supporting that line don't use words like 'some' and there is certainly no mention of 'two parachutes' in those sources. Also why are you removing quote from Asia Times source? The quote was copied directly from Asia Times source and thus it is okay to add it. What you are doing is violating No original research rule. Violating wikipedia guidelines is not a constructive behaviour. Please familiarise yourself with wikipedia guidelines. 82.178.61.254 (talk) 12:20, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

82.178.61.254, Please read what "the week" is talking about. It is about thos very pictures. As for the quote, you were misrepresenting it. 183.83.146.190 (talk) 12:26, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

Did you bother reading what theweek.in is talking about. See this paragraph: Speaking at the Pakistan Air Force headquarters in Islamabad, Air Commodore Syed Omar Shah said the "main reason behind a yearlong delay in making public the wreckage of MiG-21 Bison was a war-like situation, which prevailed at the time of dogfight". However, a cursory search on Twitter would reveal that what was shown by the Pakistan Air Force is actually old evidence. So theweek.in is clearly talking about the stuff that was released in 2020. Theweek.in further goes on and says this "In April last year, the Twitter handle of the Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR), the PR wing of the Pakistan military, tweeted an image of the wreckage of all four air-to-air missiles carried by the Indian Air Force MiG-21." After that you can't find a single line in the whole page which shows that theweek.in is questioning the images released in 2019. So it is clear that theweek.in is taking about the stuff released in 2020. You need to add wording as per what is mentioned in the source. The Asia Times use these words Meanwhile, locals on the ground reiterated that no Pakistani pilot bailed out along with Wing Commander Varthaman. Where is the mention of 'second parachutes' in these sources? Plus why are you removing the quote if you think it is being misrepresented. You could have helped improved it in accordance with what is mentioned in the source. 82.178.61.254 (talk) 12:40, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

---