User talk:171.76.80.135

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please read[edit]

wp:soap wp:forum and wp:npa. Ohh and WP:NOTDUMB. Slatersteven (talk) 17:55, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay.what's that supposed to mean? You are free to keep furthering the agenda of West under the guise of Free speech and keep fueling hatred against Islam? 171.76.80.135 (talk) 21:41, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No it means you use talk pages to argue for changes to the article, not to make political statements. It also means you do not attack other editors. Slatersteven (talk) 09:37, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Argue? Are you for real! I thought it is used for people to discuss and decide edits based on RSN and facts. Not beg sad miserable editors and Moderators to change their opinions and political leanings so that we can get a sentence added or deleted 😂 171.76.81.225 (talk) 18:12, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Read wp:npa. Slatersteven (talk) 11:55, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics[edit]

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

  • adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
  • comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
  • follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
  • comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
  • refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

331dot (talk) 09:51, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]