User talk:167.98.65.105

To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

November 2020[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to The Offspring has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: The Offspring was changed by 167.98.65.105 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.953807 on 2020-11-04T11:35:24+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:35, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Inheritance. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Inheritance was changed by 167.98.65.105 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.955142 on 2020-11-04T11:36:44+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:36, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Inheritance, you may be blocked from editing. gobonobo ⁺ ^c 11:45, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Richard Dawkins—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 15:35, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from attempting to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been disallowed by an edit filter. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 15:24, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Annabelle (film) have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Annabelle (film) was changed by 167.98.65.105 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.920361 on 2021-03-25T10:02:01+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:02, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021[edit]

Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to Rubber duck. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, please use the sandbox instead, where you are given a certain degree of freedom in what you write. Justiyaya (talk) 10:01, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2021[edit]

Hello, I'm Spotanus. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Clock position have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. --Spotanus (talk) 10:09, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2022[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to attempt to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. 2601:243:802:3747:B034:4FC1:B904:8F45 (talk) 12:58, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022[edit]

Hello, I'm Jthekid15. An edit that you recently made to Georges Ferréol Vuitton seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! JC aka JtheKid15^{(Communications)} 09:38, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2022[edit]

Hello, I'm SunilNevlaFan. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Mid-Autumn Festival have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. SunilNevlaFan ✨ 11:17, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mid-Autumn Festival. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --SunilNevlaFan ✨ 11:20, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022[edit]

Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Oleg Gordievsky, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Adakiko (talk) 08:23, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm Moops. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to List of the most popular names in the 1910s in the United States have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. — Moops ^⋠T⋡ 09:55, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Michael O'Brien (fencer). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Ormewood (talk) 02:33, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm Renewal6. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Wassily Chair have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Renewal6 (talk) 08:59, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Putney High School, you may be blocked from editing. Ormewood (talk) 23:04, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024[edit]

Hello, I'm Mlkj. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Regine Velasquez—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Mlkj (talk) 11:58, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Regine Velasquez. Ormewood (talk) 16:43, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Great Meadow Estate (May 16)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Great Meadow Estate and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:07, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 167.98.65.105! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:07, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.