User talk:12.165.172.4

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Kincardine, Ontario, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Deconstructhis (talk) 17:13, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Pippi Longstocking, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. ⋙–Berean–Hunter—► ((⊕)) 13:57, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Choi Hong-man has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Martin451 (talk) 18:12, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Sam Keller has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you.  – iridescent 23:33, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Your test on the page List of Toy Story characters worked, and has been removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing and its related help page for more information. Thank you. IronGargoyle (talk) 18:02, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ron Dayne. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —Ute in DC (talk) 23:23, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

December 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Annoyance has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Hagerman(talk) 16:18, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Annoyance constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Hagerman(talk) 16:22, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Annoyance. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 16:23, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Jerry Jones has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 22:30, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to The Hangover (film), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 20:03, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Chico with this edit, has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. For constructive edits, always provide an informative edit summary so that editors have a brief description of your intentions. If you want to try out how editing Wikipedia works, please edit the sandbox page and not encyclopedia articles. If you have questions about editing Wikipedia, you might want to take a look at this tutorial. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. ST47 (talk) 15:57, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Mao (game), but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. McGeddon (talk) 13:29, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2012[edit]

Hello, I'm Wikipelli. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Kickoff meeting, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Wikipelli Talk 19:12, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Can I ask what it is you think that you're adding to the Mao (card game) article with the "Comprehensive example" section? The article already contains the rules of the game and some guidance for adding new ones, with sources. You appear to be simply repeating all this in your own words, in a long string of bullet points, and with no sources. What exactly do you feel is lacking in the rest of the article? --McGeddon (talk) 14:18, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Go Phightins!. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, Bizzle, but that you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Go Phightins! 19:35, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bizzle. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Achowat (talk) 19:50, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Mao (card game), you may be blocked from editing. McGeddon (talk) 11:01, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Mao (card game), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. McGeddon (talk) 12:51, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2013[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Flyer22. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Bertrand Russell's views on philosophy have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Flyer22 (talk) 02:23, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm MusikAnimal. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Lake St. Clair  with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — MusikAnimal talk 21:14, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017[edit]

Information icon Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Richard Angelo. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 02:21, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your draft article, Draft:DevOpocalypse[edit]

Hello, 12.165.172.4. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "DevOpocalypse".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. » Shadowowl Marcos Rodriguez | t | SPI | AIV | Sandbox | Helpdesk » 10:37, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017[edit]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Chris Shiflett. - FlightTime (open channel) 22:35, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018[edit]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article. - FlightTime (open channel) 19:27, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]