User talk:107.242.121.7

This is a shared IP address; other customers of your internet service provider also use this address. If you did not make the edits discussed below, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Regarding your edits to Garcia House

Howdy! I just wanted to bring to your attention that not all of your copyedits to the page Garcia House (Los Angeles, California) actually improve upon the existing sentence structure or grammar, and in some cases they may even leave the sentence a bit clunkier than it already was. I genuinely trust that these edits were made in good faith, and your account looks pretty new, so I just wanted to leave you a little note to let you know that, in general, copyedits shouldn't be made in cases where no confusion or error really occurs. For example:

• You changed "The house was in the film...as well as in a 2011 commercial," to "The house was in the film...and in a 2011 commercial." While this edit did not result in an error, per se, it also didn't correct one, and it also just sounds a little clunkier when read back. In such circumstances, it's best to just leave the sentence as it stands. (Similar edits include "Located on Mulholland Drive," -> "On Mulholland Drive," and "...has been described," -> "...is described[.]")
• You also hyphenated the term "stained glass", which actually did result in a grammatical error. It's a fairly common mistake to make (I, too, think many terms that aren't/shouldn't be hyphenated are), but there's no grammatical reason why "stained glass" needs to be hyphenated, and this is backed up by its own article.

I appreciate your efforts to try to make Wikipedia better for all users. I hope these few notes will help. I also did want to make it clear which edits you got spot-on, because I don't want to bite the newcomer by only pointing out their mistakes:

• You removed the qualifying adjective "colored" from the phrase "colored stained glass", which is totally justified! "Stained glass" implies a that ordinary glass (colorless) has been given color, so that adjective was redundant.
• The change of "The Garcia house ... is a home designed by architect John Lautner," to "Designed by John Lautner, the Garcia house ..." would be great if it weren't the opening line of the article. That format is generally best suited for a subsection in the article. So, while it doesn't work great in this circumstance, you should know that it's a good edit to make in a lot of circumstances.

Best of luck going forward, and happy editing! Crossark (talk) 23:15, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

January 2019

Hello, I'm Rubbish computer. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Republic of Hawaii ‎ seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 23:24, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Ecofeminism, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 21:09, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tell Me (The Rolling Stones song), you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 22:18, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

April 2019

Hello, I'm Susmuffin. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to April Bowlby have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. ―Susmuffin ^Talk 01:04, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. NekoKatsun (nyaa) 23:51, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

May 2019

Hello, I'm Path slopu. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, Lucy Liu, but you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. PATH SLOPU 10:33, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did with this edit to Lucy Liu. Thank you. PATH SLOPU 10:34, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Lucy Liu, you may be blocked from editing. Serols (talk) 10:36, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

June 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Corn dog. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. SpicyMilkBoy (talk) 03:55, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2019

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Seamus has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Seamus was changed by 107.242.121.7 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.941919 on 2019-06-12T23:44:53+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:44, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Seamus. Balon Greyjoy (talk) 08:52, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Create an account

Might I suggest creating an account? {{u|waddie96}} {talk} 10:54, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

Warning, Chandrayaan-2 failed

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Chandrayaan-2. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.180.245.165 (talk) 01:00, 7 September 2019 (UTC) You are being warned, do not vandalize the Chandrayaan-2 page anymore, it is an undeniable fact supported by all reliable reference sources that Chandrayaan-2 failed. Go read the sources:

1.) https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/2019/09/india-chandrayaan-2-landing-attempt-moon-lunar-south-pole/
2.) https://www.npr.org/2019/09/06/758419791/indias-attempt-to-land-rover-at-moon-s-south-pole-fails
3.) https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-49615665
4.) https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/09/06/chandrayaan-2-indias-second-moon-mission-may-have-failed-scientists/
5.) https://www.cnn.com/2019/09/06/india/india-moon-lunar-landing-chandrayaan-2-scn/index.html 70.180.245.165 (talk) 00:55, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

September 2019

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Your edits may be in good faith, but you appear to be engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. SuperWikiLover223 (talk) 01:45, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2019

Hello, I'm Ifnord. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to ADX Florence have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. Ifnord (talk) 23:56, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2022

Hello, I'm DB1729. I noticed that you recently removed content from Category:Redirects to disambiguation pages without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. DB1729 (talk) 04:02, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Telenovelafan215. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Mi fortuna es amarte have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 02:55, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

---