User talk:青巷忧颜
Welcome![edit]
Hello, 青巷忧颜, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 17:49, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of User:青巷忧颜[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on User:青巷忧颜, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:53, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Notes[edit]
Hi! I have some notes:
- Be careful of "if... then..." or "therefore" type of statements. These are essentially cases where the material may state various facts or claims in order to support a more major assertion. If it's something that is pulled from the source then this may be fine as long as it's attributed, but without that attribution it can be seen as original research.
- Make sure that everything is backed up with a reliable source that explicitly makes the claim. Any subjective or point of view claims must be backed up with a reliable source and attributed, as with the last part. The sentence "Since both Prima Porta Augustus and the wall paintings try to express the same theme, which is peace, and the Villa of Livia is a place for public display, the statue is a way for Augustus to spread his reputation as a protector of peace." is an example of something that will need both a source and an attribution.
- The formal analysis needs to be written more in paragraph format. Also, this is written too much like it's a reflection upon the statue.
Let me know if you want any help with editing the work! Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 16:17, 6 December 2019 (UTC)