User talk:লাল সেলাম কমরেড

Welcome![edit]

Hi লাল সেলাম কমরেড! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Drmies (talk) 23:55, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will stay here till May লাল সেলাম কমরেড (talk) 23:59, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics[edit]

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

— DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 08:41, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024[edit]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 08:42, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

National parties with near about 5% votes and 10 seats must be added লাল সেলাম কমরেড (talk) 11:21, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Otherwise it's a discrimination লাল সেলাম কমরেড (talk) 11:21, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See Next United Kingdom general election and Next Australian general election even regional parties are added. Have I added minor parties লাল সেলাম কমরেড (talk) 11:25, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 5[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Medinipur Lok Sabha constituency, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dilip Ghosh. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 18:18, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why I'm not an extended confirmed user[edit]

Why I'm not an extended confirmed user. I have 700 edits @admin লাল সেলাম কমরেড (talk) 02:18, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. Please provide information what you are doing in summary. For any discussion see WP:Talk Page ✠ ZenDragoX✠ (contact) 09:00, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Which are unsourced? লাল সেলাম কমরেড (talk) 09:10, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may have found a wrong person. If you say about my sandbox you're not in right place. লাল সেলাম কমরেড (talk) 09:14, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please visually perceive here in your revisions in Telangana Legislative Assembly you abstracted CPI from government which had seat sharing with INC. You mentioned CPI does not support government there without citing any source that the MLA withdrew support.
In 2024 Arunachal Pradesh Legislative Assembly election you integrated INC tally as 0 but the former CM is himself an MLA there, then how it became 0 if he still is in party?
2024 Maharashtra Legislative Assembly election, you transmuted the whole format here. That's not the correct format, there is a special format and infoboxes for Indian pages.

Please see WP:EW, WP:10 and Help:ES.

Please have a look at them. ✠ ZenDragoX✠ (contact) 11:46, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In Telangana there is no minister from CPI and no decision is shared with CPI. লাল সেলাম কমরেড (talk) 13:36, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In Arunachal Pradesh I got a news in Google Chrome that all Congress MLAs joined BJP লাল সেলাম কমরেড (talk) 13:40, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For Maharashtra see Wikipedia:WikiProject Indian politics/Election: Article structure লাল সেলাম কমরেড (talk) 13:42, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is every MLA a minister in government?

Secondly you are adding false information on Wikipedia.

And please check Wikipedia:WikiProject Indian politics/Election: Article structure yourself again. ✠ ZenDragoX✠ (contact) 03:23, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See Odisha Legislative Assembly. I'll not edit if I add wrong. লাল সেলাম কমরেড (talk) 16:50, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No problem

But still in Maharashtra and Tamil Nadu you are doing this. You are still adding every party there is not in format, for other there is a special section called "results". Suppose 100 parties are contesting election and every party got 1 or more than 5 seats, those all cannot be added. Please try to understand. ✠ ZenDragoX✠ (contact) 08:00, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have talk with admins @Number 57. He suggested to use it. লাল সেলাম কমরেড (talk) 09:04, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Every party which won seat in Lok Sabha is a major party for the country or for the state because some rulling parties don't won even 1 seat লাল সেলাম কমরেড (talk) 09:33, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please read Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not, Wikipedia is not a book or any dictionary, please stop this. It is important for country but is Wikipedia. ✠ ZenDragoX✠ (contact) 10:31, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unexplained edit on Lok Sabha page.[edit]

Please stop altering numbers without providing any sources. After your edits the total number of MPs described in lead section is now stands at 545. Wheather it should be 543 according to Constitution. Kalpesh Manna 2002 (talk) 06:48, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have corrected the error YSR had 17 MPs not 19 লাল সেলাম কমরেড (talk) 09:16, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete information[edit]

User Lal Salam, the other format you are introducing has incomplete information. It cancels party leaders, party seats, even major parties. What do you mean by "But we can use it"? We should use the format which provides a more complete overview. MrMkG (talk) 09:32, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Block evasion[edit]

WP:BLOCKEVASION by creating new accounts when a previous one is blocked is not acceptable on Wikipedia. YOU, the person behind the account, are blocked. Ignoring the problems that lead to your original accounts being blocked by creating more and more sockpuppets is disruptive and not helpful. Per WP:BANREVERT, your edits have been reverted and will continue to be reverted. WP:STANDARDOFFER is probably the only avenue back to editing in good faith for you, but that requires six months of zero editing on Wikipedia. No sock accounts. No IP editing. None. And then you have to convince administrators that you understand the problems you've caused and have addressed them. Ravensfire (talk) 20:06, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am not a sock account লাল সেলাম কমরেড (talk) 22:52, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm can't wait for 6 months for no reason. I would be very busy after 6 months লাল সেলাম কমরেড (talk) 02:11, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

লাল সেলাম কমরেড (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I agree to not change format and avoid similarity to other users. Please forgive me

Decline reason:

Please only make one unblock request at a time. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:35, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

লাল সেলাম কমরেড (talk) 23:12, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

লাল সেলাম কমরেড (talk) 23:09, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

লাল সেলাম কমরেড (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have returned to Wikipedia after 5 years. I had a account 5 years back. But to busyness.I stopped editing in Wikipedia and has forgotten my password and account. If I have done anything wrong. I agree.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 23:03, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

লাল সেলাম কমরেড (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I know I have been blocked for changing format. But I had changed the format because they were many edit wars based on it and some users continuously removing major parties. I have talked with admins like Number 57. Who suggested to use this format for Indian articles. Secondly someone claimed similar edit to another user. Yes I use to observe Wiki users. I have corrected the order of parties. I completely agree I was wrong. Please unblock me. I have used Assamese username not Bengali to avoid others to use my username.

Decline reason:

One open unblock at a time. This is the second time you've done this. Don't let there be a third. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:42, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You have recently made a disruptive edit in 2024 Indian general election in Jharkhand removing whole content. লাল সেলাম কমরেড (talk) 23:35, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ZenDragoX I have not listened to him because he was continuously abusing me from beginning. লাল সেলাম কমরেড (talk) 23:17, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why you have reverted my edits? লাল সেলাম কমরেড (talk) 23:16, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I used to edit through IP but few days back my IP had been blocked for adding unsourced and they suggested me to create an account. লাল সেলাম কমরেড (talk) 23:15, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Maphumor told me to change format in all articles. লাল সেলাম কমরেড (talk) 23:13, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Someone abused me with bad words https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2024_Indian_general_election_in_Kerala&diff=prev&oldid=1212409269&title=2024_Indian_general_election_in_Kerala&diffonly=1 still I haven't told anything but how bad is @ZenDragoX who want editors to loose editing ability. Isn't not autocratic. লাল সেলাম কমরেড (talk) 23:24, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making new unblock requests in the middle of the page. Unblock requests should be made at the bottom of the page. --Yamla (talk) 00:13, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally, you are blocked for abusing multiple accounts. I don't see you addressing this in your unblock requests. The content of your edits is not relevant. --Yamla (talk) 00:14, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

লাল সেলাম কমরেড (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I know I have been blocked for changing format. But I had changed the format because they were many edit wars based on it and some users continuously removing major parties. I have talked with admins like Number 57. Who suggested to use this format for Indian articles. Secondly someone claimed similar edit to another user. Yes I use to observe Wiki users. I have corrected the order of parties. I completely agree I was wrong. Please unblock me. I have used Bengali or Assamese by using google translator to avoid others to use my username. Please first confirm by check user. If I have done anything wrong pardon me. I promise to make good edits which would be beneficial for others. I have done 1K+ edits in only 5 days. I don't know how I have become a sock of another account. I don't even know that account. There may be few similarities. I know Wikipedia found sock my IP address. Do we share same IP? If there are any similar I'll try to avoid it in any cost.

Decline reason:

Per below. — Daniel Case (talk) 10:40, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

লাল সেলাম কমরেড (talk) 02:04, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note over at User talk:লাল সেলাম, this user has agreed to go at least six months with zero edits, then apply under WP:SO. On that basis, the above unblock request should be declined. --Yamla (talk) 20:43, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]