User:The Gneiss Guys/sandbox

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A bioindicator is any species (an indicator species) or group of species whose function, population, or status can reveal the present a qualitative analysis status of the environment. There is a broad range of species that can be used as bioindicators in an environment, such as vegetation, amphibians (frogs and toads), macroinvertebrates (crustaceans and gastropods), microbes, and more. For example, copepods and other small water crustaceans that are present in many water bodies can be monitored for changes (biochemical, physiological, or behavioural) that may indicate a problem within their ecosystem. Bioindicators can reveal the cumulative effects of different contaminants and pollutants that are present within an the ecosystem, and about how long a problem may have been present, which physical and chemical testing may not assess, and can attempt to provide additional information about the amount and intensity of the exposure.

A biological monitor or biomonitor is an organism that provides quantitative information on the quality of the environment around it. Therefore, a good biomonitor will indicate the presence of the pollutant and can also be used in an attempt to provide additional information about the amount and intensity of the exposure.

A biological indicator is also the name given to a process for assessing the sterility of an environment through the use of resistant microorganism strains (eg. Bacillus or Geobacillus). Biological indicators can be described as the introduction of a highly resistant microorganisms to a given environment before sterilization, tests are conducted to measure the effectiveness of the sterilization processes. As biological indicators use highly resistant microorganisms, any sterilization process that renders them inactive will have also killed off more common, weaker pathogens.

Contents[edit]

****Reworked the table of contents and shifted some sections around

Overview[edit][edit]

A bioindicator is an organism or biological response that reveals the presence of pollutants by the occurrence of typical symptoms or measurable responses and is, therefore, more qualitative. These organisms (or communities of organisms) can be used to deliver information on alterations in the environment or the quantity of environmental pollutants by changing in one of the following ways: physiologically, chemically or behaviorally. To assess the environmental health and associated risk of contamination and pollution, it is essential to establish efficient bioindicators that have the ability to provide data from an environment and translate the data into health and pollution information.[1] The information can be deduced through the study of:

  1. their content of certain elements or compounds
  2. their morphological or cellular structure
  3. metabolic biochemical processes
  4. behavior
  5. population structure(s).

The importance and relevance of biomonitors bioinidicators, rather than man-made equipment, are justified by the observation that the best indicator of the status of a species or system is itself. Bioindicators is that they can reveal indirect biotic effects of pollutants when where many physical or chemical measurements cannot. Through the use of bioindicators, scientists are able need to observe and focus on only the indicator single indicating species to check on the environment rather than monitor the whole community.

The use of a biomonitors bioinidicators is described as biological monitoring and is the use of the properties of an organism to obtain information on certain aspects of the biosphere. Biomonitoring of air pollutants can be passive or active. Experts use passive methods to observe plants growing naturally within the area of interest. Active methods are used to detect the presence of air pollutants by placing test plants of known response and genotype into the study area.

The use of a biomonitors bioinidicators is described as biological monitoring. This refers to the measurement of specific properties of an organism to obtain information on the surrounding physical and chemical environment

Bioaccumulative indicators are frequently regarded as biomonitors. Specifically, organisms have the ability to bioaccumulate concentrations of a particular contaminant or pollutant that surpass levels found in the natural environment.[2] Depending on the organism selected and their use, there are several types of bioindicators.

Use[edit][edit]

In most instances, baseline data for biotic conditions within a pre-determined reference site are collected. Reference sites must be characterized by little to no outside disturbance (e.g. anthropogenic disturbances, land use change, invasive species). The biotic conditions of a specific indicator species are measured within both the reference site and the study region over time. Data collected from the study region are compared against similar data collected from the reference site in order to infer the relative environmental health or integrity of the study region.

An important limitation of bioindicators in general is that they have been reported as inaccurate when applied to geographically and environmentally diverse regions. As a result, researchers who use bioindicators need to consistently ensure that each set of indices is relevant within the environmental conditions they plan to monitor.

Plant indicators[edit] Vegetative Bioindicators[edit]

The presence or absence of certain plant or other vegetative life in an ecosystem can provide important clues about the health of the environment: environmental preservation. Vegetation can monitor the pathway of a pollutant as it is uptaken into an environment and aid in the remediation of contaminated media (soil and water).[3] There are several types of plant and plant-like biomonitors bioindicators, including mosses, lichens, tree bark, bark pockets, tree rings, and leaves. Fungi too may be useful as bioindicators.

Lichens[edit]

Lichens are organisms comprising both fungi and algae. The lichen Lobaria pulmonaria is sensitive to air pollution. They are found on rocks and tree trunks, and they respond to environmental changes in forests, including changes in forest structure – conservation biology, air quality, and climate. The disappearance of lichens in a forest may indicate environmental stresses, such as high levels of sulfur dioxide, sulfur-based pollutants, and nitrogen oxides. The composition and total biomass of algal species in aquatic systems serve as an important metric for organic water pollution and nutrient loading such as nitrogen and phosphorus. There are genetically engineered organisms that can respond to toxicity levels in the environment; e.g., a type of genetically engineered grass that grows a different colour if there are toxins in the soil.

Solidago canadensis (common name Goldenrod)[edit]

Goldenrod plants form compact patches due to their ability to reproduce quickly.[4] It can withstand a broad span of environmental conditions, including contaminated or polluted media, has relatively high aboveground biomass, and has an intricate belowground root system. Goldenrod is relatively easy to sample for biomonitoring and phytoremediation.[5] From dividing plants into leaves, stems, and roots, there can be differences in contaminant accumulation.[3]

Goldenrod Solidago canadensis is commonly used as a bionindicator.[3]




Animal indicators and toxins[edit] Amphibians[edit]

Changes in animal populations, whether increases or decreases increasing or decreasing, can indicate pollution. For example, if pollution causes depletion of a plant, animal species that depend on that plant will experience population decline. Conversely, overpopulation may be opportunistic growth of a species in response to loss of other species in an ecosystem. On the other hand, stress-induced sub-lethal effects can be manifested in animal physiology, morphology, and behaviour of individuals long before responses are expressed and observed at the population level. Such sub-lethal responses can be very useful as "early warning signals" to predict how populations will further respond.

Pollution and other stress agents can be monitored by measuring any of several variables in animals: the concentration of toxins in animal tissues; the rate at which deformities arise in animal populations; behaviour in the field or in the laboratory; reproduction; and by assessing changes in individual physiology.

Examples of Amphibian Bioindicators[edit]

Frogs and toads[edit][edit]

Amphibians, particularly anurans (frogs and toads), are increasingly used as bioindicators of contaminant accumulation in pollution studies. Anurans absorb toxic chemicals through their skin and their larval gill membranes and are sensitive to alterations in their environment. They have a poor ability to detoxify pesticides that are absorbed, inhaled, or ingested by eating contaminated food. This allows residues, especially of organochlorine pesticides, to accumulate in their systems. They also have permeable skin that can easily absorb toxic chemicals, making them a model organism for assessing the effects of environmental factors that may cause the declines of the amphibian population. These factors allow them to be used as bioindicator organisms to follow changes in their habitats and in ecotoxicological studies due to humans increasing demands on the environment. citation needed

Knowledge and control of environmental agents is essential for sustaining the health of ecosystems.[citation needed] Anurans are increasingly utilized as bioindicator organisms in pollution studies, such as studying the effects of agricultural pesticides on the environment. concentrations of PCBs in contaminated streams. [6] Environmental assessment to study the environment in which they live is performed by analyzing their abundance in the area as well as assessing their locomotive ability and any abnormal morphological changes, which are deformities and abnormalities in development.[citation needed] Decline of anurans and malformations could also suggest increased exposure to ultra-violet light and parasites.

Pond-breeding anurans are especially sensitive to pollution because of their complex life cycles, which could consist of terrestrial and aquatic living. During their embryonic development, morphological and behavioral alterations are the effects most frequently cited in connection with chemical exposures. Effects of exposure may result in shorter body length, lower body mass and malformations of limbs or other organs. The slow development, late morphological change, and small metamorph size result in increased risk of mortality and exposure to predation.

Macroinvertebrates[edit]

Macroinvertebrates are useful and convenient indicators of the ecological health of water bodies and terrestrial ecosystems. They are almost always present, and are easy to sample and identify. This is largely due to the fact that most macro-invertebrates are visible to the naked eye, they typically have a short life-cycle (often the length of a single season) and are generally sedentary. Pre-existing river conditions such as river type and flow will affect macro invertebrate assemblages and so various methods and indices will be appropriate for specific stream types and within specific eco-regions. While some benthic macroinvertebrates are highly tolerant to various types of water pollution, others are not. Changes in population size and species type in specific study regions indicate the physical and chemical state of streams and rivers. Tolerance values are commonly used to assess water pollution and environmental degradation, such as human activities (e.g. selective logging and wildfires) in tropical forests. An integrative biological assessment of sites in the Custer National Forest, Ashland Ranger District

Benthic indicators for water quality testing[edit][edit]

Benthic macroinvertebrates are found within the benthic zone of a stream or river. They consist of aquatic insects, crustaceans, worms and mollusks that live in the vegetation and stream beds of rivers. Macroinvertebrate species can be found in nearly every stream and river, except in some of the world's harshest environments. They also can be found in mostly any size of stream or river, prohibiting only those that dry up within a short timeframe. This makes the beneficial for many studies because they can be found in regions where stream beds are too shallow to support larger species such as fish. Benthic indicators are often used to measure the biological components of fresh water streams and rivers. In general, if the biological functioning of a stream is considered to be in good standing, then it is assumed that the chemical and physical components of the stream are also in good condition. Benthic indicators are the most frequently used water quality test within the United States. While benthic indicators should not be used to track the origins of stressors in rivers and streams, they can provide background on the types of sources that are often associated with the observed stressors.

Global context[edit][edit]

In Europe, the Water Framework Directive (WFD) went into effect on October 23rd, 2000. It requires all EU member states to show that all surface and groundwater bodies are in good status. The WFD requires member states to implement monitoring systems to estimate the integrity of biological stream components for specific sub-surface water categories. This requirement increased the incidence of biometrics applied to ascertain stream health in Europe A remote online biomonitoring system was designed in 2006. It is based on bivalve molluscs and the exchange of real-time data between a remote intelligent device in the field (able to work for more than 1 year without in-situ human intervention) and a data centre designed to capture, process and distribute the web information derived from the data. The technique relates bivalve behaviour, specifically shell gaping activity, to water quality changes. This technology has been successfully used for the assessment of coastal water quality in various countries (France, Spain, Norway, Russia, Svalbard (Ny Alesund) and New Caledonia).

In the United States, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published Rapid Bioassessment Protocols, in 1999, based on measuring macroinvertebrates, as well as periphyton and fish for assessment of water quality.

In South Africa, the Southern African Scoring System (SASS) method is based on benthic macroinvertebrates, and is used for the assessment of water quality in South African rivers. The SASS aquatic biomonitoring tool has been refined over the past 30 years and is now on the fifth version (SASS5) in accordance with the ISO/IEC 17025 protocol. The SASS5 method is used by the South African Department of Water Affairs as a standard method for River Health Assessment, which feeds the national River Health Programme and the national Rivers Database.

The imposex phenomenon in the dog conch species of sea snail leads to the abnormal development of a penis in females, but does not cause sterility. Because of this, the species has been suggested as a good indicator of pollution with organic man-made tin compounds in Malaysian ports.

Examples of Macroinvertebrate Bioindicators[edit]

Crustaceans[edit][edit]

Crayfish (Faxonius lancifer).

Crayfish have been hypothesized as being suitable bioindicators, under the appropriate conditions. Crustaceans are sensitive to changing water chemistry, and can accumulate concentrations of contaminants and pollutants in their tissues, which can trigger variable responses depending on the type of pollutant. Crayfish tend to have increased heart rates at night as nocturnal organisms, but increased heart rate can be caused by specific pollutants. Changes in their circadian rhythm can also provide evidence about the health of an aquatic ecosystem.[7]

Gastropods[edit]

Gastropod Tridopsis sp. are useful bioindicators for detecting pollutants within an environment [8]

Gastropods are widely used as bioindicators because they have the ability to accumulate concentrations of contaminants and pollutants in their soft tissues and shells that exceed concentrations in other organisms within the same environment.[8] This bioaccumulation can be useful in monitoring how a pollutant is uptaken and transported, and can provide insight into the degree of risk for an environment.[9] Long-term exposure of contaminants and pollutants tend to accumulate in the digestive tract, whereas short-term exposure can accumulate in the mantle and/or gut.[10] Elevated concentrations of contaminants and pollutants can cause lesions, atrophy, lipid accumulation, irregularities in shell structure, deterioration in growth/reproduction, and other issues.[11][12]


Microbial Boindicators[edit][edit]

Chemical pollutants[edit][edit]

Microorganisms can be used as indicators of aquatic or terrestrial ecosystem health. Found in large quantities, microorganisms are easier to sample than other organisms. Some microorganisms will produce new proteins, called stress proteins, when exposed to contaminants such as cadmium and benzene. These stress proteins can be used as an early warning system to detect changes in levels of pollution.

In oil and gas exploration[edit][edit]

Microbial Prospecting for oil and gas (MPOG) is often used to identify prospective areas for oil and gas occurrences. In many cases, oil and gas is known to seep toward the surface as a hydrocarbon reservoir will usually leak or have leaked towards the surface through buoyancy forces overcoming sealing pressures. These hydrocarbons can alter the chemical and microbial occurrences found in the near-surface soils or can be picked up directly. Techniques used for MPOG include DNA analysis, simple bug counts after culturing a soil sample in a hydrocarbon-based medium or by looking at the consumption of hydrocarbon gases in a culture cell.

Microalgae in water quality[edit][edit]

Microalgae have gained attention in recent years due to several reasons including their greater sensitivity to pollutants than many other organisms. In addition, they occur abundantly in nature, they are an essential component in very many food webs, they are easy to culture and to use in assays and there are few if any ethical issues involved in their use. Gravitactic mechanism of the microalgae Euglena gracilis (A) in the absence and (B) in the presence of pollutants.

Euglena gracilis is a motile, freshwater, photosynthetic flagellate. Although Euglena is rather tolerant to acidity, it responds rapidly and sensitively to environmental stresses such as heavy metals or inorganic and organic compounds. Typical responses are the inhibition of movement and a change of orientation parameters. Moreover, this organism is very easy to handle and grow, making it a very useful tool for eco-toxicological assessments. One very useful particularity of this organism is gravitactic orientation, which is very sensitive to pollutants. The gravireceptors are impaired by pollutants such as heavy metals and organic or inorganic compounds. Therefore, the presence of such substances is associated with random movement of the cells in the water column. For short-term tests, gravitactic orientation of E. gracilis is very sensitive. Other species such as Paramecium biaurelia (see Paramecium aurelia) also use gravitactic orientation.

Automatic bioassay is possible, using the flagellate Euglena gracilis in a device which measures their motility at different dilutions of the possibly polluted water sample, to determine the EC50 (the concentration of sample which affects 50 percent of organisms) and the G-value (lowest dilution factor at which no-significant toxic effect can be measured).


  1. ^ Corvalan, C., and Kjelfstrorn, T. (1995) Health and environment analysis for decision making. World health statistics quarterly 48(‎‎2)‎‎ : 70-77.
  2. ^ Galal, T. M., & Shehata, H. S. (2015). Bioaccumulation and translocation of heavy metals by Plantago major L. grown in contaminated soils under the effect of traffic pollution. Ecological indicators, 48, 244-251. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.08.013
  3. ^ a b c Tomiyasu T, Matsuo T, Miyamoto J, Imura R, Anazawa K, Sakamoto H. Low level mercury uptake by plants from natural environments--mercury distribution in Solidago altissima L.-. Environ Sci. 2005;12(4):231-8. PMID: 16184082.
  4. ^ Huang H, Guo SL (2005) Analysis of population genetic differences of the invasive plant Solidago canadensis. Bull Bot Res 25(2):197–204
  5. ^   Bielecka, K. (2019). Solidago canadensis as a bioaccumulator and phytoremediator of Pb and Zn. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 26(36), 36942–36951. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06690-x
  6. ^   Colette J. DeGarady, & Richard S. Halbrook. (2006). Using Anurans as Bioindicators of PCB Contaminated Streams. Journal of Herpetology, 40(1), 127–130. https://doi.org/10.1670/30-05N.1
  7. ^   Malinovska, V., Ložek, F., Kuklina, I., Císař, P., & Kozák, P. (2019). Crayfish as Bioindicators for Monitoring ClO2: A Case Study from a Brewery Water Treatment Facility. Water (Basel), 12(1), 63–. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12010063
  8. ^ a b Martin, M.H. and J. Coughtrey, Use of terrestrial animals as monitors and indicators. In Biological Monitoring of Heavy Metal Pollution (K. Mellamby, Eds.), 1982: p. 253-271.
  9. ^   Dummee, V., Kruatrachue, M., Trinachartvanit, W., Tanhan, P., Pokethitiyook, P., & Damrongphol, P. (2012). Bioaccumulation of heavy metals in water, sediments, aquatic plant and histopathological effects on the golden apple snail in Beung Boraphet reservoir, Thailand. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 86, 204–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2012.09.018
  10. ^   Anne Taylor, & William Maher. (2006). The Use of Two Marine Gastropods, Austrocochlea constricta and Bembicium auratum, as Biomonitors of Zinc, Cadmium, and Copper Exposure: Effect of Tissue Distribution, Gender, Reproductive State, and Temporal Variation. Journal of Coastal Research, 22(2), 298–306. https://doi.org/10.2112/05-0601.1
  11. ^ Nica, D., Filimon, M., Bordean, D., Harmanescu, M., Draghici, G., Dragan, S., & Gergen, I. (2015). Impact of Soil Cadmium on Land Snails: A Two-Stage Exposure Approach under Semi-Field Conditions Using Bioaccumulative and Conchological End-Points of Exposure. PloS One, 10(3), e0116397–. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116397
  12. ^ Karakaş, S., & Otludil, B. (2020). Accumulation and histopathological effects of cadmium on the great pond snail Lymnaea stagnalis Linnaeus, 1758 (Gastropoda: Pulmonata). Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology, 78, 103403–103403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.etap.2020.103403
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:The_Gneiss_Guys/sandbox&oldid=993622886"