User:SafariScribe/XfD log

This is a log of all deletion discussion nominations made by this user using Twinkle's XfD module.

If you no longer wish to keep this log, you can turn it off using the preferences panel, and nominate this page for speedy deletion under CSD U1.

February 2024

1. Rufai Waris: nominated at AfD; notified Pfomma (talk · contribs) 10:03, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: Draftified the article for sile purpose of being improved. Yet moved back to main space without addressing citation needed tags and notability. Clearly fails WP:GNG. A thorough name of the artist cannot be seen on google /bing search before talking about references. The article cited sources which seems to be obvious blog and non of them is reliable.
2. Asker International School: nominated at AfD; notified HimSur9 (talk · contribs) 14:29, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: Clearly no sign of notability. Fails WP: SCH
3. Biafra Liberation Army: nominated at AfD; notified Emmanuel6103 (talk · contribs) 13:32, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: The page in question may meet notability but I don't think it's ready for a stand alone page. Pointing WP: REDIRECT to Simon Ekpa.
4. Kholova Fotima: nominated at AfD; notified KhabibulloevMS (talk · contribs) 13:22, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: I declined the CSD and now going through AFD. The neutrality of the article is disputed and was created as clear first level advert, even with seeing this. The editor created many drafts with has redirected to here. The sources seems unclear and being questioned. But the article fails WP: GNG, WP: ANYBIO, WP: SPORTSPERSON.
5. Swaady Martin: nominated at AfD; notified BobVillars (talk · contribs) 09:48, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails WP: GNG and WP: SIGCOV. There were questionable sources cited and they neither say why the article is notable.

March 2024

1. PBM (band): nominated at AfD; notified Graysonar (talk · contribs) 00:55, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: Per former nominations. Since the former deletion, there is no source for passing WP: GNG and WP: NMUSIC.
2. Justin Jin (entrepreneur): nominated at AfD; notified Deondernemers (talk · contribs) 07:15, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: I can't find any reasonable.purpose for a standalone article. I noticed this could be vandalism since the parenthesis isn't movable except by an admin. Well, I can't find sources which didn't provide me enough reasons to be inclusive. Fails WP: GNG. The founding company doesn't seem to be notable or reach any WP: ORG and some of not all seems to base on the company and not the subject (there could be mentions) but still Notability is not inherited. While I believe Notability is not permanent, The young subject can be notable in the future
3. Bitsaeon: nominated at AfD; notified Aidillia (talk · contribs) 09:27, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: I wanted to redirect but decide to AFD so that a consensus will be made. The article was typically based on M.O.N.T including if not all the sources. The article didn't pass WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. I AFD it to he WP:TOOSOON and per WP: MUSICBIO may need to be redirected to the article M.O.N.T. For WP:PRESERVE, Like the singing competition may be fixed variably and optionally, though he may not meet.
4. Joseph Iyobo: nominated at AfD; notified Macwinamos (talk · contribs) 04:51, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fails GNG and no SIGCOV. Being a head of a church regards a notable one per WP:BISHOP and verifiable by multiple reliable sources. It is noteworthy to say: it's neither written as an Encyclopedic material nor a notable reference since it lacks context also to identify WP:N
5. Kehinde Ipaye: nominated at AfD; notified Eddymike234 (talk · contribs) 14:51, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: I can't find much SIGCOV to establish notability. Almost all the sources if not all were about his company which are too not notable per WP: ORG. No way yet for meeting GNG. Fails business people guideline for notability.
6. Mary Ikoku: nominated at AfD; notified ChikaOjiegbe (talk · contribs) 15:41, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: I am doubtful of passing GNG. Per Before gave articles linking only to her campaign like this one although have no results nor passes WP:NPOL. SIGCOV is also a problem and judging from the media aspect, the subject fails ANYBIO.
7. Chuma Mmeka: nominated at AfD; notified Amamonic (talk · contribs) 16:36, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: There are many sources but all are blogs and self published. No way to notability and SIGCOV. The books were all self pubs and the citations were blogs from unreliable sources. The subject fails WP:AUTHOR and no way to SNG
8. Dan Gelber (game designer): nominated at AfD; notified BOZ (talk · contribs) 13:57, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: An article about a non notable game designer. Lacks SIGCOV and no verifiability whatsoever. If he has created a notable game, he should have appeared on reviews ad multiple news source.

April 2024

1. Kafilat Araoye: nominated at AfD; notified Dfertileplain (talk · contribs) 19:32, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: An article about the CEO of a bank which doesn't prove notability. It's more of inherent and not a direct entry to Wikipedia. It was proposed for deletion but was deproded for redirect /merge. When it has been redirected, another editor reverted it with reasons whatsoever. It s more to civility and consensus if it's discussed. For now, it down meets GNG, but per WP:ATD, redirect to Lotus Bank
2. Martin Herbster: nominated at AfD; notified Lugnuts (talk · contribs) 07:42, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: An article about an individual who gained not much into sports. I am still looking for redirect and per SIGCOV, it's pure to the purest eyes of lacking even microscopic sources! King me when sources are found and I will be ready to withdraw (I also didn't see any from BEFORE!).
3. Mirosław Modzelewski: nominated at AfD; notified Das osmnezz (talk · contribs) 19:45, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: An article about a football player that doesn't meet Wikipedia's standards for inclusion in the encyclopedia and WP:SPORTSBASIC. No news hit on Google news except sports database—lacks SIGCOV!
4. Adeseha Wuraola Becky: nominated at AfD; notified GolaFilms (talk · contribs) 10:41, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: An article about a Nigerian actress, filmmaker, Philanthropist and a business woman that doesn't meet Wikipedia's general notability guidelines and WP:NACTOR. The actress has appeared in non notable films and has neither lead any role or praised for that role in any film per WP:BEFORE. Gross case of WP:LOTSOFSOURCES: the sources seems to bear interview natures like "she said", "I did abortion", etc and doesn't mean WP:SIGCOV. Sideway drive of promotional clauses !
5. Kim Yeong-uk: nominated at AfD; notified Davidlofgren1996 (talk · contribs) 20:45, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: Not hit of SIGCOV on google news aside from database results which is lot a secondary source or WP:RS. The articles didn't meet WP:GNG, WP:SPORTSBIO and WP:SPORTSCRIT for the time. May be notable in the future!
6. Birtara Union: nominated at AfD; notified Fahimlinkon (talk · contribs) 05:49, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: An article that lacks context for readers and editor. Looking at the article, I can't say whether it's a place or something related to an organisation. Hence, doesn't meet WP:GNG, WP:NCORP, WP:NGEO. I have searched for sources but found none. The one source cited seems not strong to attain WP:GNG as it doesn't pose significant coverage or verifiable ones that say the topic exist and is notable.
     Aside from theses, facts needs to be verifiable. I will also need a ping when sources are found.
7. Jeff Unaegbu: nominated at AfD; notified Revolutionary Images (talk · contribs) 01:53, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: I came about this article during clean up and saw it's contains a bit vague and non verifiable content. Taking into cleaning up, I became tired at the line seeing almost if not all the sources lacks editorial guidelines, perhaps doesn't go with our policy and guidelines for reliable sources.
     On the other hand, apart from the quality percentage of primary sources linking to book that were self published in the platforms such as Amazon, etc., the article contains a bit hoaxes that were made (those I have removed removed when cleaning part of the article). The article in general doesn't conform with Wikipedia's inclusion for author, WP:JOURNALIST—since he edited a magazine and has written for some magazines per the article. Lacks verifiable source and seem looking like a advert/promotional/vaguely constructed source, and more.
     The books doesn't meet our guidelines for books, so we may try redirecting or WP:PRESERVE albeit there is nothing to be preserved here. I also discovered the previous AFD that reads 'no consensus', and it seems there were no improvement or rather say; the previous AFD seeking for clean up which I've did to some part and found no substantial need for the inclusion of this article. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 01:53, 23 April 2024 (UTC)