User:RenamedUser jaskldjslak901/Archive23

Hi

Can you please tell me why you deleter Lakshmi NAture Cure and Yoga Center.. Actually, Janjellyroll, who had put a notability on my page did not reply to my query about his doubt. I will quote my message which i had sent to him.

"" Hi

Can you please tell me why you had put a notability notice in the page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lakshmi_Nature_Cure_and_Yoga_Center. Actually i am from kerala and i know about this hospital which is one of the best hospitals of the place. Please tell me what i should add to the article to remove this notice of notability

Thank you, Kiran

""

Hence i did not know what changes to make.. Atleast can you tell me why it was deleted ?

Hoping for a response this time. Kiran

Recent block

Please reread Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Squeakbox, there is some disagreement with your decision. (I am one who disagreed, but I am not the only administrator that has disagreed.) But I really, really, don't want any more related wheel-warring for the ArbComm case to review, so I'd much rather you did any reversion than that anybody else did, not just me. GRBerry 23:26, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Oh, well, too late. Please read the discussion anyway. GRBerry 23:29, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

RfA thanks

Hi, Jaranda, I just wanted to thank you for your support on my RfA, which was successful with a final tally of 61/0/2. I'm glad you found me a good editor and that you appreciated Durin's nom (remarkably thorough, I thought). If you have any comments about my use of the tools I would be glad to hear from you on my talk page. Thanks again! Heimstern Läufer 08:12, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

Chacor RfA

He tells me you want to nominate him also. We should work something out. Grandmasterka 08:49, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

Eh... Not a huge fan of IRC, besides which I've never used it. I'll start writing something up at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Chacor 2 in a few days and we can use e-mail for discussion if you insist on keeping it totally private. Grandmasterka 08:08, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

My ISP's doing upgrading on Thur Mar 8, so I won't have internet access for 9 hours that day. The earliest I'd accept is therefore probably March 9. Cheers, – Chacor 02:25, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Noted. Jaranda, you might want to hop in there now, I've finished writing my nomination statement. Grandmasterka 05:03, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

I'll let you do a self-nominate, I hurt my shoulder wrestling with several of my friends yesterday so I'm not in wrting/heavy typing mode. I'll give my support though. Thanks Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 22:49, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

More recent blocks

(Yes, I know this is a few days old.) While I don't disagree with your decision to block User:Stoic atarian for disruption, removal of warnings has never been a valid cause for blocking. Try to avoid that in the future. Zetawoof^(ζ) 10:16, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Push-Button Seatbelt Buckle

Curious as to you deletion of the subject article? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by F.porter (talk • contribs) 18:17, 25 February 2007 (UTC).

Regarding speedy deletion of the Quarantine_(nightclub) article

Hi Jaranda! Just a quick note to say that I am a little bemused by your speedy deletion of the Quarantine_(nightclub) article that I created last Saturday night. Although I will agree that the article was a bit sparse (I created it initially as a stub) I was planning to edit more in over time, and given that there are several other articles for U.K. nightclubs on Wikipedia, I would consider that my addition was perfectly valid and justifiable.

I notice that you cited the A7 category as the reason for your deletion. Would this still apply if I cite the clubs position and standing in the local community, events and other such things, or is it best left alone?

Hyperspeed 01:00, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

The club really needs to be nationally known with valid, reliable sources for wikipedia, that club had no claim of notabilty, let me see the other UK nightclubs article, most of them likely don't claim notabily as well. Thanks Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 01:10, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

regarding deletion of Abraham Casto article submitted by jcasto1

Hi Jaranda - I'm new, still learning. Curious as to code or reason for deletion, so I can work to improve next one. Couldn't find reference to the code. jcasto1.

Antonella Barba

A week ago or so I ended up watchlisting this page due to some blanking, so I noticed a day or so ago that you reverted it to a redirect, apparently as a result of an AfD discussion. This is not sticking, and a variety of accounts, some possibly SPAs, continue to recreate the article. I do not feel that it's a solid enough situation to possibly violate 3RR, so I figured I'd let you know. Natalie 01:31, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Mutli Focal Personality

Hi! I would like to know why exactly you've deleted the article "Multi-Focal Personality"?
Thanks!
--194.90.216.102 11:39, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Battle frontier

while i disagree with your hasty closing of the deletion debate (keep arguments were not countered - and the only remaining issue, verifiability, could have been fixed with references) rather than bring it up to deletion review, i'd rather work on the section in Pokemon Emerald and then once it is large enough, split it again at a later time, that way ensuring it is created as a better article. That said, there were large amounts of information on the original article that are now inaccessible and i wanted to know if you could userfy it for me. thnx in advance -ΖαππερΝαππερ ^Babel_Alexandria 23:00, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

My Pojuner Page

Hi! I would like to know why exactly you've deleted my Page Pojuner ? What authority can I report you to for doing this without my permission ? 83.67.90.164 10:06, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

My RfA

Thanks for your support in my recent RfA which passed unanimously - thus proving that you can indeed fool some of the people some of the time. I'm still coming to terms with the new functionality I have, but so far nothing bad has happened. As always, if there's anything you need to let me know, just drop me a line on my Talk page. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 10:44, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Entrusted with the Bucket!

Yes, my identical copy of bucket-and-mop =]

Thank you for supporting me in my RfA. Thanks for your vote, I've received an overwhelming 96% support and successfully took a copy of bucket-and-mop from the main office!

School graduation exam and HKCEE are both pressing in, so I might become inactive for a while. But soon after that, I look forward to working with you! --Deryck C. 03:36, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Latest Selena edits

Just wanted to say it's so good to have you back! Thanks for your hard work keeping this article at FA status and explaining to others how we can keep it there. Lawikitejana 16:29, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Sam Cookson

Hello. You deleted Sam Cookson about a week ago, an A7 by the looks of the log summary. Can you check its history to see if it was previously about a more notable Sam Cookson, a footballer from the 1920s? The Answers mirror suggests this. If so, can you undelete it? I would like to expand it. Oldelpaso 14:41, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

I deleted someones A7 vanity in that article, I restored the non vanity parts of the article which was about the football player. My mistake. Thanks Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 16:11, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. Oldelpaso 16:41, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Tropical cyclones WikiProject Newsletter #10

The March issue of the WikiProject Tropical cyclones newsletter is now available. If you wish to receive the full newsletter or no longer be informed of the release of future editions, please add your username to the appropriate section on the mailing list.--Nilfanion (talk) 22:13, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Happy Spread-the-funny and-slighty-random-love day!

:) pschemp (talk) 03:09, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Kyle Eckel

user Chrisjnelson continues to revert your corrections and continues to post harmful and unofficial information into this biography of living person.

His comments include "kicked out of the Navy" as well as discussing financial issues that are not properly sourced and can not be properly sourced since they are untrue.

By seeing the edit history its obvious that Chrisjnelson has a special interest in spreading malicious information about my client.

Judging from your awards and past participation in the removal of harmful and incorrect information from the article titled Kyle Eckel I thought you would be willing to further help the situation by taking the proper steps to completely block user Chrisjnelson from ever editing the biography ever again

Thank you very much for your time.

"Navyfootball 04:21, 5 March 2007 (UTC)"

Jaranda, do you have any other background on this? http://www.belleville.com/mld/miamiherald/email/sports/16044329.htm seems to be a valid source for the statement that had been in the article. (I have no preference in the matter - I just noticed the issue on BLPN.) --BigDT 04:43, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Kyle Eckel Pt. II

I did cite the information. From the beginning. I consider The Miami Herald a reliable for source for news, seeing as how it's a huge newspaper. What's the problem here? And as far as the guy above me saying I have an interest in spreading malicious, that's just ridiculous. I posted the info and sourced it. I did nothing wrong. If he wants to hide that truth about it, that's his business. But I don't deserve to be made to look like the bad guy here.Chris Nelson 04:53, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Kyle Eckel Pt. III

Citing newspaper articles, blogs, personal opinions etc are not valid or credible sources regardless of how "big" the source is.

The newspaper itself, and any newspaper for that matter, is unable to cite any specific and OFFIAL information. Pure hear say is being used for any article or any information Chrisjnelson is adding to this article.

Kyle Eckel Pt. IV

http://www.navytimes.com/legacy/new/0-NAVYPAPER-2346524.php

I suppose the Navy Times isn't a credible source on the Navy either. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Chrisjnelson (talk • contribs) 05:01, 5 March 2007 (UTC).

Kyle Eckel Pt. V

No its not

The Navy Times is a private publication. The Navy Times is not sponsored or published by the Navy. The Navy Times writes its own stories and is a paper that covers the Navy due to its own decision.

Again, if you do research you'll see the Navy Times is a private newspaper that has absolutely no affiliation with the Navy other then the coverage it tries to offer. "Navyfootball 05:29, 5 March 2007 (UTC)"

For the sake of not carrying on the discussion across four different pages, I suggest we move it to Talk:Kyle Eckel. I have added the three sources that we have there for discussion. Can we continue the discussion there? --BigDT 05:42, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Kyle Eckel

Jaranda,

Kyle Eckel continues to be added to or tampered with on a semi daily basis despite revisions by Admins. It seems some Admins use their priveledges ethically and others use Wikipedia as their own personal blog or debate forum. Anything we can do to take care of this problem once and for all? Anything permanent? thank you "Navyfootball 20:01, 5 March 2007 (UTC)"

RfA thanks

Hi, Jaranda. Just a quick note to say thanks for the support on my RfA. Trying to get around and thank everyone personally and try to make good my promise of clearing the backlogs. Thanks again. Bubba hotep 21:11, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

1993 Topps

Hi, I was searching the deletion logs but I could not find any info so I wanted to know why you deleted the 1993 Topps article? Libro0 17:47, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Hi, I was hoping I could get the article undeleted. I was unawawre it had been proposed for deletion and was not able to contest it since I just found out. I don't know who proposed it or why, but I would like the opportunity to make the article suitable for Wikipedia in whatever way I can wether it be merging, etc. Libro0 18:47, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Thank you, the merger has been made. Libro0 20:18, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Antonella Barba protection and deletion review

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Antonella Barba. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. CrazyC83 03:16, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

What do you think?

This user believes images should be moved to the Commons.

Just curious. --evrik ^(talk) 16:33, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Sports articles

Hi Jaranda, I am writing about your posting at Wikipedia:Reward_board. I have been the primary editor in bringing several articles on college football to GA status:

1. Vince Young - former GA, working right now to adress why it was delisted and get it relisted.
2. Colt McCoy - current GA
3. 2006 Alamo Bowl - current GA

Also, while not the primary author, I helped with the following:

1. 2005 NCAA Division I-A football rankings - current FA
2. 2006 NCAA Division I-A football rankings - current nom for FA - looks like it will pass based upon the support so far.
3. Ralphie - current GA - I helped with the text and provided the lead photo (GFDL-self)
4. Oklahoma Sooners football - contributions to the text

Please let me know if the above contributions meet your criteria for the bounty. Best, Johntex\^talk 17:17, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

List of Miami Dolphins Quarterbacks

Please review the talk page of this article regarding your recent redirects. This information is not reflected in the article and took quite some time to compile. Thanks, ++Arx Fortis 21:07, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Hey Jaranda. I personally agree with Arx Fortis on this, although my opinion probably doesn't matter. I would ask you to reconsider, or at least don't just cite WP:ISNOT. :) Please? GofG _|^|_| Contribs 03:45, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

User talk:Newtekie1

Any comment or thoughts on this user's current unblock request? – Luna Santin (talk) 05:45, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Your decition, I remembered he was extremly rude in a email I had with him a month back when he asked to be unblocked though. Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 03:26, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

Tupac RfC

Hey, Jaranda. The old discussion about 'Pac's birthname is back! I've filed an request for comment hoping to clear this up. The RFC can be found under "Tupac Shakur" on this list, and the actual discussion can be found on Talk:Tupac Shakur#RfC, in case you wish to participate. -Mysekurity 06:15, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Trinity Christian High School

I thought I would let you know that this article is up for deletion again and you can vote on it at the following page: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trinity Christian High School (2nd nomination)

--MJHankel 01:10, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Solon Band

It was re-instated by Enochlau as shown in the [log]. As shown here where it says "restored": 01:45, 11 March 2007 Enochlau (Talk | contribs) restored "Solon Band" (103 revisions restored: undelete and take to prod). The64 03:27, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

That was a week ago, and he prodded it instead, but it's a valid CSD A7 and completely unsourced, and you aren't reading the policy pages that I been giving you, blanking them and asking for other admins for help. Sigh Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 03:33, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

re: Asspie

I had to undelete the page and reopen the RFD discussion. Despite first appearances, it's not actually an attack - it's a recognized slang term (though misspelled) for a person with that syndrome. I've attempted to explain further on the RfD page. Sorry. Rossami (talk) 02:04, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Family Guy Neologisms

I have to applaud you for coming to a conclusion regarding the debate. Many admins would have just thrown up their hands and said no consensus. Well done. Mangojuice^talk 03:12, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for your support on my Request for Administration

I'm happy to say that thanks in part to your support, my RfA passed with a unanimous score of 40/0/0. I solemnly swear to use these shiny new tools with honour and insanity integrity. --Wafulz 15:27, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Augusta High School deletion

Jaranda, would you please fill me in on the Augusta High School (Kentucky) stubification? I had been aware of a request to delete the article from outside WP, but the resulting discussion I saw seemed to indicate that that would not happen. Why now? I don't recall anything particularly controversial in the article. And why would WP comply with such a request? Also, does the WP:OTRS reference just mean that the delete request came in via email? Is there a discussion covering this decision archived someplace? Thank you.

—  Jim Dunning  talk  :  04:03, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

I'm curious as well, having followed the earlier AfD. Vees 13:58, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

American Idol contestants protection

I don't know if the discussion at Talk:American Idol was a consideration that led you to protect List of American Idol contestants. Just to let you know, I do not support recreation of a deleted article unless I strongly feel the article is warranted. (I have not recreated any previously deleted articles, by the way.) This protection was a rather extreme way to lead me to think such an article is unwanted. For that reason and other circumstances, I am not going to recreate it. I just want to ask you when, if ever, would such an article be appropriate in your view. Tinlinkin 05:47, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Deletion of image per WP:OTRS

Hey, Jaranda - I noticed that an image I had uploaded was deleted in accordance with an OTRS complaint; I was wondering if you could share anything with me (either here or by e-mail) on the source of the complaint, as the image was a public-domain U.S. Government photograph. Thanks for any clarification you can provide, cheers. 68.13.108.188 17:14, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Oops, just noticed I was on Meta, I normally am only on en Wikipedia and don't watch here - my talk page is here. 68.13.108.188 17:15, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

FYI, I put it up for deletion review here. Cheers - RJASE1 ^Talk 20:23, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

• Could you let me know the ticket number, please? Guy (Help!) 23:18, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

• Never mind, the backstory is now filled in. Obviously the right thing to do. Guy (Help!) 12:17, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

RFA Thanks

I would like to thank you for your support in my recent RFA. As you may or may not be aware, it passed with approximately 99% support. I ensure you that I will use the tools well, and if I ever disappoint you, I am open to recall. If you ever need anything, don't hesitate to leave me a note on my talkpage. Thanks again, ^demon^{[omg plz]} 20:39, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Joseph DiVencenzo

Hi - can you advise why this page was deleted? Did it violate a rule? Thanks! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 138.89.76.4 (talk) 22:55, 29 March 2007 (UTC).

Wikibreak

I hope all is okay! -- Natalya 16:01, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Jaranda's userpage redlinked? That's not good. I second Natalya's comment, I hope everything is all right on your end. Picaroon 23:49, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Tropical cyclones WikiProject Newsletter #11

The April issue of the WikiProject Tropical cyclones newsletter is now available. If you wish to receive the full newsletter or no longer be informed of the release of future editions, please add your username to the appropriate section on the mailing list.--Nilfanion (talk) 16:21, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

RfA thanks

Thank you for your Support on my recent nomination for adminship, which passed with a final tally of 89/1/1. If there's anything I can help with, then you know where to find me. Cheers. - Michael Billington (talk) 06:51, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Ambassador of Hindu-Muslim unity

Why was Ambassador of Hindu Muslim Unity deleted?

why deleted

i took the picture from my camera, so i shouldn't need copyrights. how to put it up again? Farazars 02:51, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Request

Could you please either protect or delete User:Jaranda/Wikipedia's first IRC chat? I have left a complaint on talk about this. Everyking 06:25, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Thank you. Everyking 18:37, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Why did you SProtect Virginia_Tech_massacre?

From WP:SPP, "Semi-protection should not be used: As a preemptive measure against vandalism before any vandalism has occurred.". You're stopping many legitimate editors from making edits, and I didn't see much to any vandalism before you protected it. -Halo 18:20, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

I think that Jaranda made a wise choice. Look at edits such as this: [1] See the timeline section. There's been a lot of vandalism coming in from IPs and there's at least 6, 7, 8 edits occurring per minute right now which is making vandalism tough to fight. Metros232 18:22, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

One amount of vandalism compared to dozens of constructive edits. Lots of edits happening per minute means vandalism gets removed quickly. -Halo 18:27, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Not really with edit conflicts up the wahzoo. Metros232 18:30, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Perhaps for now - I just think that hasty sprotecting of pages seems to happen a lot on Wikipedia, which is against policy, takes time to get rid of, can be almost impossible to get rid of at times (since it's admins and the admins don't have to answer to anybody) and is to the detriment of many articles -Halo 18:33, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

I think that it's appropriate for now while everything is still developing (after all, we're an encyclopedia, not a major news outlet, we don't need to have every detail as it comes in). Jaranda put it for 24 hours of protection, I wouldn't be surprised if another admin (I might wind up doing this later) lifts the protection later today--maybe in 6, 8, 10 hours--when the information is more concrete. Metros232 18:36, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

I completely disagree - it contradicts policy (again, WP:SPP - it's designed to stop persistent vandalism, not preempt it), and also means edits can't get though, which is extremely important for new up-to-date articles, which is why we're having this discussion -Halo 18:38, 16 April 2007 (UTC)