User:Raymond arritt/Expert withdrawal/Draft
Challenges to the integrity of Wikipedia[edit]
Wikipedia aspires to be a respected encyclopedia. Unfortunately, Wikipedia's success has created an obstacle to this aspiration: the prominence of Wikipedia has made it an attractive target for those promoting fringe views, such as pseudoscience, quackery, and conspiracy theories. Certain aspects of Wikipedia and its culture make it overly difficult to respond to these attempts to manipulate the project for questionable ends.
Here we describe some of the challenges to Wikipedia's integrity as a reference work that arise from the vigorous promotion of fringe views, and offer suggestions as to how the community can meet these challenges.
Challenges[edit]
(statement about the different types of problems/challenges (comm, on articles, editor behavior))
 | This user page or section is in a state of significant expansion or restructuring. You are welcome to assist in its construction by editing it as well. If this user page has not been edited in several days, please remove this template. If you are the editor who added this template and you are actively editing, please be sure to replace this template with {{in use}} during the active editing session. Click on the link for template parameters to use.
This page was last edited by Baegis (talk | contribs) 16 years ago. (Update timer) |
Community Problems[edit]
- Disruptive or tendentious editors often are given repeated "last chances" in hopes that they will reform. Though well-intended, this ignores the effect that these persons have on constructive editors. The community has neglected to weigh the potential benefits of reforming an editor with a history of disruption against the cost to constructive editors who abide by community norms.
On Article Problems[edit]
xxx
Editor Behavior Problems[edit]
xxx
RFC Process Problems[edit]
blah blah