User:Mmounties/current3

Process for sysopping someone

1. Bureaucrats wait at least seven days after the listing was made on Wikipedia:Requests for adminship before closing the RfA.
2. If it is not a self-request, the buraucrat checks to makes sure that the user has accepted the nomination. If it hasn't been accepted the buraucrat contacts the sominated user via a post on his/her page to make him/her aware of the nomination. If the user then does not accept within [fill in a reasonable period - I suggest 24 hours] the nomination is pulled from the page and nullified. In such a case the nomination is considered neither succeeded, nor failed but simply removed from the Wikipedia:Requests for adminship page and the nominating user is informed in a supporting manner.
3. At the end of the seven day "open" period, the closing bureaucrat makes a determination that the vote was not obviously unduely influenced with sockpuppets or otherwise bogus votes [need to give an example for what other factors might make a vote "bogus"]. If there is a suspicion of sockpuppetry or other undue influence (clarify with example) and the suspicion is confirmed by Wikipedia:Requests for CheckUser, the tally is updated to reflect only valid votes.
4. Then the closing bureaucrat checks if there is a "general consensus" that the person should be sysopped. The rule of thumb is that

   • nominees with less than a 75% of support are not promoted without extenuating circumstances. Consequently, it is very rare indeed that a nominee is promoted with less than 75% of support.
   • nominees with 80% or more support are generally promoted. Similarly, it is very rare that a nominee is not promoted with this level of support.
   • nominees with a support ratio between 75% and 80% are promoted at the bureaucrat's discretion taking into consideration the comments made and discussion conducted on the nomination page, including comments made by "neutral" votes.
   • For purposes of determining the above percentage benchmarks "neutral" votes are disregarded entirely and the following formula is applied:

   ${support}\div ({support}+{oppose})$

5. Important: For bureaucrat nominations a support ratio of at least 90% is generally considered necessary for promotion. Consequently, in a year and a half, no-one has become a bureaucrat with less than 90% support and only two have been made bureaucrat with more than two opposes.
6. If a sysop promotion is made or denied outside of the above guidelines, or in the area between 75% and 80%, the bureaucrat explains the reasoning behind the decision on that nomination's talk page for inquiring editors to see.
7. If the here outlined conditions for promotions are met for a particular nomination, the bureaucrat makes the nominee an admin or bureaucrat using Special:Makesysop and adds his/her name to the list at Wikipedia:List of administrators or Wikipedia:Bureaucrats.
8. Then the bureaucrat uses {{subst:rfap}}-{{subst:rfab}} as a header and footer, respectively, when closing a successful nomination and, similarly, {{subst:rfaf}}-{{subst:rfab}} for a failed nomination. The "Vote here" link is then removed and the word "Final" is placed before the parenthetic voting results, "ending" is changed to "ended" and the ending time and date are updated to reflect the current time and date.
9. For successful nominations, the bureaucrat moves the listing from requests for adminship to recently created admins or recently created bureaucrats. For unsuccessful administrator nominations, the listing is moved to Wikipedia:Unsuccessful adminship candidacies and for unsuccessful bureaucrat nominations, the transclusion from requests for adminship is simply removed.
10. If the nomination has succeeded, the bureaucrat informs the user that he or she is now a sysop or bureaucrat. If the nomination has failed, the user is informed of this in a supportive manner.