Thi's user know's that not every word that end's with s need's an apostrophe and will remove misused apostrophe's from Wikipedia with extreme prejudice.
You and Me
This user thinks that if you believe it is incorrect to use "you and me" as the object of a sentence, a little talk needs to be had by you and me...
This user actually thinks that singular "they" is currently nonstandard but is good to use and ought to be officially integrated into standard prescribed English, but doesn't know how to make userboxes.
its & it's
This user understands the difference between its and it's. So should you.
This is a Wikipediauser page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user in whose space this page is located may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Minetruly/Sandbox.
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
message Minetruly (talk) 02:09, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
Seriality vs. interactivity in sentence processing: Friederici (Lau), Hagoort, Kim & Osterhout
Existence of "morphology": decomposition vs. connectionism (Devlin et al 2004; Bozic et al 2007; Gold & Rastle 2007; Bird et al for older, aphasia stuff)
Functions of Broca's area
Specific processes reflected by ERP components (mainly N400 and P600...maybe a bit on LAN and ELAN as well)
Seriality vs. interactivity in sentence processing: Friederici (Lau), Hagoort, Kim & Osterhout
Existence of "morphology": decomposition vs. connectionism (Devlin et al 2004; Bozic et al 2007; Gold & Rastle 2007; Bird et al for older, aphasia stuff)
Functions of Broca's area
Specific processes reflected by ERP components (mainly N400 and P600...maybe a bit on LAN and ELAN as well)
It's my belief that most productive Wikipedians first arrive at the site wanting to do something that is against WP policy -- advance a point of view, cover something that doesn't meet the notability guideline, etc. We also often bring baggage from other Internet sites where the social norms or policies permit different kinds of behavior -- social networking activity, attacks, canvassing, what have you. None of this makes us bad people, just people who have not yet fully absorbed the Wikipedia ethos.
