Reliable publications include established newspapers, academic journals and books, textbooks, and other published sources with reputations for accuracy and fact-checking.
Unreliable sources include blog posts and other self-published works, press releases, and social media posts.
In order for a source to be considered verifiable, other editors should be able to consult the source.
Is the source independent of the subject?
Is the source connected in any way to the subject? This is especially important when writing biographies or about organizations.
For example, if you were writing a biography, sources like the person's webpage or personal blog would not be considered independent.
Is the source primary or secondary?
Primary sources include first-hand accounts, autobiographies, and other original content.
Wikipedia allows limited use of primary sources, but typically only for straightforward, descriptive statements of facts, and only if they are published and verifiable without requiring specialized knowledge.
Secondary sources should be the main basis for a biography on Wikipedia.
If you're working on a topic related to medicine or psychology, ensure that your sources follow these special guidelines.
If you're creating a new article, consider the following:
Ensure that your topic meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
In order for a topic to meet the notability requirement, you must be able to identify 2-3 sources that are reliable, verifiable, and independent of the subject you're writing about.
Finding sufficient sources to establish notability can be especially hard when writing about people or organizations.
Sources that are not independent of the subject might be useful additions, but don't count towards the notability requirement.
Wikipedia has developed special guidelines for writing about living persons. Please follow these carefully.
Wikipedia has a series of guidelines for writing about different categories of people, such as academics and artists. If you're trying to create a new entry about a living person, please look at these carefully.
If you're not sure whether a source is reliable, ask a librarian! If you have questions about Wikipedia's sourcing rules, you can use the Get Help button below to contact your Wikipedia Expert.
This is where you will compile the bibliography for your Wikipedia assignment. Add the name and/or notes about what each source covers, then use the "Cite" button to generate the citation for that source.
“The Astonishing City of Troy with 4000 Years of History.” Made in Turkey Tours, 15 Apr. 2022, https://madeinturkeytours.com/troy/.
This source was used to give the population of the ancient city of Troy alongside a few physical details of the city
Farrell, Vivian. “How Big Was the Trojan Horse?” Horse Fund, 20 Aug. 2021, https://horsefund.org/how-big-was-the-trojan-horse.php.
This site took historical accounts of the city of Troy and how the horse penetrated the city to infer physical qualities of the Trojan horse.
Jarus, Owen. “Ancient Troy: The City and the Legend.” LiveScience, Purch, 8 Feb. 2022, https://www.livescience.com/38191-ancient-troy.html.
This is an article that covers the basics of the Trojan War history, giving a general outline as to why it occurred, what the conflict was, and what the significance of the Trojan War had on the ancient world and the modern world.
Jarus, Owen. “History of Ancient Sparta.” LiveScience, Purch, 23 Sept. 2017, https://www.livescience.com/32035-sparta.html.
The Spartan queen was the one who's abduction started the Trojan War, so it is important to understand the significance of Spartan culture. They discuss how women had a higher role than in other nations, which can showcase why her abduction was so significant.
Obviously the Trojan Horse doesn't exist without the War, this site gives insight on what the horse itself actually looked like, and how it's role played into the War.
