User:Dr. Blofeld/November 2013

Recent work on Skagen

I'm impressed with all your work on Skagen but despite your invitation, my last two major edits have failed because of edit conflicts. I note the points you would like me to cover and I will once again have a go at them when you are through with you present round of editing. I also note the need for an article on Drachmann's House. Just let me know when the ground is clear and I'll get back to it. In the meantime, I have been working on the Skagen Painters.--Ipigott (talk) 15:42, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Mary Cybulski (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Kinsey, Spartan, Heist, Silver City, Sunshine State, Duplicity, The Happening and The Brave One

David Farrar (actor) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Michael Powell

Dingle Bay (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Kinard

Martin Scorsese (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Sabu

Sabu Dastagir (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Michael Powell

Skagen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Dannebrog

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:04, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

• I would support nuking the village stubs, but expect it would be hard to get agreement. Trouble is that if the stub has a name and coords, and whatever municipality or district it belongs to, maybe an infobox, in theory that is the start of something more. Of course it attracts rubbish like "Mir Khan is most widely respected and honorable headman and has made many beneficent works for the benefit of all and sundry, also his family.. Maybe if the criteria are set really low it might fly. Are there are non-notable villages? I don't know. I would support it, but am pessimistic about whether it would get consensus. Aymatth2 (talk) 00:15, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Trichy

Hi, hope you're doing good. Looks like Mughal-e-Azam is all set for an FA. Can you spend some time in c/e the article. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 13:09, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi. C/e Trichy rather than Mughal you mean LOL. I was going to say! Yes, I'll aim to work on it probably Monday. Excellent work!♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:19, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi, I missed your message on my talk. Thought you were too busy. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 15:13, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Famous petrol pumps

Naya Lahore is poor quality in most ways: not referenced at all, poorly formatted, poorly written, not much information other than trivia. In a sense, it reflects the very early ideal of Wikipedia, the idea that if everyone contributes what they know an encyclopedia will emerge. There is no need for sources, no need to worry about initial quality, because over time well-meaning people will improve and correct the entries. I don't believe it, I think everything should have sources, and dislike trivial stubs. But an attempt to delete this one would almost certainly fail. Even if no sources could be found, the reasoning would be that all villages are inherently notable, and this one just needs improvement.

• Malyam cites one source that confirms existence and gives some minimal unsourced information
• Moguluru gives no sources but some information
• Munganda has produced talented individuals who have contributed significantly for the welfare of the society at large. There is also some information, some sources
• Nunna has no information apart from an infobox and coordinates. The coordinates are wrong, belonging to Pamarru
• Kakanur says next to nothing, but does say something.

I dunno. One solution, maybe, probably would not fly, would be to roll up the village articles into lists in the admin unit they belong to. Deleting the unsourced rubbish like the famous PSO Petrol Pump in Naya Lahore would probably not be challenged, but it would creep back in anyway. Maybe there should be a "Garbage" project quality rating, one level below Stub, defined as "nothing but poorly written, unsourced trivia." That could be worth pursuing. Aymatth2 (talk) 15:04, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

"Garbage" is obviously the wrong word, but I can't think of a polite euphemism. Very unlikely to get acceptance.

Many of these are worse than stubs in the sense that a stub can be well-written and well-sourced, but give only minimal information. If a village is located on a map, the district is named and the latest census count is given with a citation, that has some value. Based on quantity of information, Naya Lahore is more than a stub, but the quality is terrible. I see that template:Cleanup-rewrite has added this article to Category:Wikipedia articles needing rewrite from June 2013. Other templates would add it to other lists, e.g. Category:Articles lacking sources. My guess is this will not directly cause anyone to do anything. But the Wikipedia:CatScan tool could be used to help with clean-up drives for defined types of articles, like unreferenced villages in Punjab, with defined objectives...

Articles that are under Populated places in Attock District and under Articles lacking sources: Basia, Pakistan, Dowal, Gondal, Pakistan, Ikhlas, Pindigheb, Jalalia, Punjab, Kamra, Momanpur, Nakka Kalan, Painda, Pindsultani, Salem Khan, Shinka, Tarap, Attock

Do these articles cause damage? I think the Naya Lahore one does. It demonstrates that anyone can write anything they feel like without giving any sources and get away with it, so it makes people less likely to use Wikipedia. Also, it discourages someone who wants to do the job properly, perhaps a bright high school student from that town, from tackling the job. I can't see getting agreement on any kind of quarantine. On the other hand, I can't see any kick-back on a fairly ruthless clean-up, purging defined types of unsourced material. That would have value. Aymatth2 (talk) 17:44, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

List of populated places in Adilabad district looks excellent to me. And yes, doing it for the whole subcontinent would be a huge and very tedious job. But it would greatly reduce the addition of well-meaning garbage that makes WP look bad. There must be some way to get editors that like straightforward and useful tasks to take this on. I assume that a decent job can be done using just the census list and Google maps. Anything else is gravy. Aymatth2 (talk) 16:19, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

I am quite uncertain about what to do with the unsourced articles. Check Kamanpalle. Someone has put a fair amount of effort into it, and there is no reason to doubt the accuracy. But it is completely unsourced, and much of the information trivial - no way it belongs. Nuke it? Part of me says yes, part says no. Aymatth2 (talk) 16:54, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Alatskivi Castle

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:03, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

General Auditor

	General Auditor Award
	Dr. Blofeld, for your fine work at auditing articles, I award you the "General Auditor" epaulette. Rosiestep (talk) 17:12, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

William Burges TFA (maybe)

Oops, Dr B., my fault. I should have let you know when I was notified. Sorry. But it'll still be a great day if it comes off. Although it's been listed before so I'm rather more cautious. But as and when it is, I will know it never would have got there without you, for which I remain truly grateful. I hope you're well. Best regards. KJP1 (talk) 22:52, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Malören

Hi there. I just noticed that you've moved Malören to Wikispace. Seems an odd thing to do, so perhaps it was a mistake? If not, are you planning to delete the redirect? Cheers, violet/riga _^[talk] 00:06, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi. We're auditing articles checking for errors, shouldn't take longer than 24 hours. That particular article though had already bene checked and is fine to go back if Rosie hasn't done so already.♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:41, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Ahh, I see. It just seems strange to have cross-namespace redirects, especially when the destination contains some meta-content. Such audits are certainly worthwhile though. violet/riga _^[talk] 11:10, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

We add a table with pointers to address, so can't really do it in the mainspace and want the editing history to appear in it in the audits which we make. Feel free to move it back to the mainspace.♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:29, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

I think it would be OK to move this one back to the main space. I've provided a Swedish reference for the history of the pilot station. In future, I think it might help leave something in the form of a stub on the main space before moving the whole thing into a sandbox. I'm not sure whether a redirect from the mainspace to a sandbox is "kosher" for Wikipedia. I spent quite a bit of time researching this one at the beginning of October and am a bit surprised to see it moved but understand the need for double checking. (BTW, it all reminds me of the French translation of MacBeth, Act 2, Scene 3, when MacDuff says "Oh, horror, horror, horror!" sometimes translated into French as "O malheur! malheur! malheur!" - poor island.)--Ipigott (talk) 15:26, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

I started checking it yesterday and soon realized you'd already checked it. Rosie's clearly been busy as I approved it for returning over 24 hours ago now. There you go, she's restored, no problem... if there's any more listed in Wikipedia:WikiProject Rosblofnari/Audit which you've already checked feel free to remove it.♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:04, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Sorry I didn't notice it yesterday. I moved it this morning. --Rosiestep (talk) 16:28, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

DYK for InterContinental Geneva

The DYK project (nominate) 08:03, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Main Page appearance: William Burges

This is a note to let the main editors of William Burges know that the article will be appearing as today's featured article on December 2, 2013. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please ask Bencherlite (talk · contribs). You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/December 2, 2013. If it needs tweaking, or if it needs rewording to match improvements to the article between now and its main page appearance, please edit it, following the instructions at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/instructions. The blurb as it stands now is below:

William Burges (1827–81) was an English architect and designer, and one of the greatest of the Victorian art-architects. He sought in his work to escape from 19th-century industrialisation and the Neoclassical architectural style and to re-establish the architectural and social values of a utopian medieval England. He stands within the Gothic Revival tradition, his works echoing the Pre-Raphaelites and heralding the Arts and Crafts Movement. His first major commission was Saint Fin Barre's Cathedral, Cork, in 1863. Burges's most notable works are Cardiff Castle and Castell Coch, both for John Crichton-Stuart, 3rd Marquess of Bute. Other buildings include Gayhurst House, Knightshayes Court, and St Mary's, Studley Royal. Many of his designs were never executed or were subsequently demolished, and his plans for the redecoration of the interior of St Paul's Cathedral were abandoned. He also designed metalwork, sculpture, jewellery, furniture and stained glass. Art Applied to Industry, a series of lectures he gave to the Society of Arts in 1864, illustrates the breadth of his interests. The revival of interest in Victorian art has led to a renewed appreciation of Burges and his work. (Full article...)

UcuchaBot (talk) 23:05, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Congratulations! Thank you for all your Burgesian efforts :) Gareth E Kegg (talk) 22:29, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the thanks!

Were you going through todays DYK's? Do you go through them everyday? If you see the edit summary it is an honest one cause really after 2 hours on-the-trot I actually fogot what I added! Sohambanerjee1998 10:52, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

I don't read the hooks nope, but if the article name looks interesting I'll click it. If considerable effort has been put into an article I hit the thank button, a shame more editors don't do so.♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:57, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Neither do I but as they a change starts with you. , I recieved a thanks and going by your If considerable effort has been put into an article I hit the thank button... I think you have appreciated my effort and heres an earnest and grateful Thank you... ! for appreciating a fellow editors work. Thanks again. Best regards, Sohambanerjee1998 12:21, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Often easier to start over than to try to patch up a mess

If the whole article is unsourced and the village does not have even a tea stall, it is probably simpler just to delete all the content, search for sources that discuss the subject and put in what they say. Or simpler still, delete all the content and make it a redirect to the parent article. In late 1970s, Dumalla, Kattherapaka, Modempelli families were moved out to Kodishelapalle which lies between Kamanpalle and Thommidigudiselapalle. Right. Aymatth2 (talk) 16:45, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

Chaplin GAN

Hiya - I see you've started making edits to the Chaplin page re Cassianto's comments. I appreciate the good will here, but I'm actually working through the requests right now (I prefer to do it all in one) and would quite like to do it myself (or Susie can, since she's a co-nom) if that's okay. :) Thanks! --Loeba (talk) 20:45, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

Hey Doc, I've opened the PR now, which is here. I wasn't sure if you wanted to take part in a review of the article or not? Obviously we'd love to have your thoughts, but if you aren't so inclined that's absolutely fine. :) Have you seen Captain Phillips yet? I watched it at the cinema yesterday, very tense! I can't wait for Gravity now, hoping to watch it in IMAX 3D (I've never seen a film in IMAX before). --Loeba (talk) 17:00, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of populated places in Adilabad district, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bela and Thanoor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Resilient Barnstar
	You are the pride and joy of Wikipedia! Without people like you Wikipedia would not move forward! Banaster Giver Extra Polite (talk) 11:37, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

A strange one

Hey Dr B, I hope you're well. I've got a real strange one here … Once you're back in the evil lair, would you be able to look in at User talk:Quadell#mirror images? It's regarding a new Harrison biography, which – well, it basically rips off Wikipedia's Harrison album and song articles. Mighty weird, but mighty true.

What I'm hoping is, you might want to follow the link from Quadell's page and hit "helpful" on my Amazon review for the book – which I've signed as "HariG". In the interests of drawing attention to this issue – which, the more I think about it, is really concerning and far-reaching – I'd simply like to ensure that the review is helpful=popular enough to register in the listing's main space. Quite understand if you'd rather not of course (but I sure hope you do!). Many thanks. Best, JG66 (talk) 20:05, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Yes, sorry to see. This sort of thing is becoming increasingly common in book writers and journalists. It's shoddy journalism. You could potentially sue him if he didn't credit wikipedia in his book for copyright as the text is not free if wikipedia is not attributed. Must be even more annoying for you that you've put money in this cheat's pocket for work you yourself wrote in good faith for public viewing.♦ Dr. Blofeld 22:11, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Yes indeed, and thank you. As I've said elsewhere, with almost all of the articles from Rock's Backpages, they've not appeared in any Harrison or Beatles book in the past – it's so blatant. PS, did you vote on Amazon? (Sorry, I'm getting obsessed with "useful" ratings there! All very negative of me – karmic wheel 'n all. Ridiculous.) Best, JG66 (talk) 11:07, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

I did yes.♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:13, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Skagen

Review all sorted: a few comments and pointers and the article is on hold for a week. Cheers - SchroCat (talk) 23:49, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

I've worked on some of the points mentioned. --Rosiestep (talk) 03:22, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Thanks both!♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:16, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

The Coveted American Wiki-Gnoming Award --truly I'm jazzed-- thanks Dr. B! --Rosiestep (talk) 15:13, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Falling rain

I'm no fan of their site. But why did you remove that cite without replacement? Is there no canonical source for small-town elevation data? – SJ + 03:41, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Sj, it isn't a reliable source, not even close to resembling one. Ask User:Fram or User:Aymatth2 or anybody. Not only is the website over 15 years out of date but the data especially population and altitude has been shown to be grossly inaccurate. I tried to get it blacklisted a long time ago. but for some reason it wasn't. One coastal town in Madagascar with an elevation barely above 0 once had a 360 metres figure for it! Ignore it like the plague... ♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:15, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Situation

Dear Dr Blofeld, I am sorry to disturb you but maybe you can give me a piece of advice. I’ve found myself in the awkward situation. Being myself a “Dr”, journalist and editor, I am not a WP man at all - my activity is very limited. Mostly it’s concerned with the article about young multi-awarded British actor Tom Holland that was almost incidentally created by me more than 3 years ago and included, I believe, a lot (maybe too much) of properly referenced material. You can understand what’s happening with this article at the moment if you look at here where the situation is represented in great detail. Basically, one very experienced and decorated editor has removed most of the content claiming that the article (this is how it looked before his/her intervention) is an extraordinary example of promotion and puffery. He/she considers as such actually every mention of most awards, all the citations by leading critics or prominent names and even the mentions in the media (he removed all the citations from and references to the leading papers – be it Guardian, NY Times or Hollywood Reporter). E.g., info that 15 y.o. actor was longlisted for an Academy award in the Best Actor category he considers as puffery, etc. All these can easily be found in many, many WP articles about other actors but he/she is unrepentant despite his edits and views in general, in my opinion, are at odds with the established WP practice. As a result, the article now looks as a stub stripped of any significant “encyclopedic” info beyond a limited number of pure facts – not like a lot of other well-maintained articles about actors. Somehow the info that is legitimate in other articles cannot be present in this particular one, and I don’t think it does justice to the young actor.

I acknowledge that the article’d had issues, needed toning down, some reformulations, etc. – no doubt. I also know that it’s not easy and pleasant to argue with me as I like to deal with issues in clinical detail, without general words – which is tiresome and irritating for many. I don’t ask you to intervene or confront that seemingly powerful and self-important editor who (being in my opinion incompetent in the subject of actors and showbiz in general) thinks he knows better to make significant decisions in a whim without any discussions at all. Of course I don’t ask you to be “on my side” (although I was already foolish enough to cite your text about WP problems which seems enraged my opponent even more). But being very busy in real life and in addition non-native speaker I cannot win that case in principle, and not sure what can be done. What I do know now is that I’m not going to contribute to WP (at least, beyond my speciality which is technical) anymore. What I actually want to ask you: Is it at all possible to draw attention to the Holland article of some experienced editors specialised in the area of “actors and filmmakers”? Maybe they can contribute and keep an eye on that unfortunate article. I don’t think that one editor, even so decorated, should impose his doubtful vision there without any challenge. I understand, of course, that they can disagree with me and agree with him, that’s fine. Hopefully, new contributors can use some info (that was just removed) which otherwise will be lost.

P.S. To outline the context - a few words how the situation developed (although that’s not that important). An editor Lady Lotus had removed info about a number of awards (including Hollywood Spotlight Award, London Film Critics Circle Award, National Board of Review Award, etc.) from Holland article. I reverted her edit and politely ask her to discuss the matter on the article Talk page, and only then make a decision. You would think that was a routine situation. Not so. Instead engaging with a discussion, Lady Lotus wrote on Talk page of the editor Tenebrae asking for help (interestingly, her message started from "Hello dear :)" ). And she got what she wanted: Tenebrae` wrote a very personal message to me (on the Talk page of the Holland article), in particular: “certainly seems to be a partisan editor… That is not helpful to this beautiful, altruistic project to help bring free, egalitarian knowledge and reference materials to the world”, and Lady Lotus helpfully added: “I completely agree with Tenebrae regarding AdVal as a user and what kind of editor they are appearing to be.” (After that she also wrote on Tenebrae’s Talk page: "Thanks so much love! :)"). Having dealt with me they draw their attention to the Holland article and in five minutes did a lot of radical edits. I posted a very detailed reply about those edits asking some principal questions. No avail: without answering concrete questions, Tenebrae continued his axing of the content accompanying it with only personal remarks directed at me. I know how I’d deal wih such a textbook situation in a real world but no sure about here. Never mind. Sorry again for overlong message (alas, it's always the case with me). Best, AdVal (talk) 18:14, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Looking at this I'd agree with the remover that it is excessive for the lead, but I think the London Film Critics Circle Award is probably worthy of mentioning in the lead if it is supported by a source in the body of the article later on. I'd guess that User:Tenebrae saw a COI and puffery issue and decided to take action.♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:29, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

One to watch

Please can you keep an eye on the efforts of this user? They've done nothing wrong and hopefully never will ... but I'd love to see a Blofeld summary at some point ;) - Sitush (talk) 21:44, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Hehe should I direct something towards him like "I've been expecting you, now bugger off?"♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:02, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

SF piers

Hi there. I noticed Pier 35 (San Francisco). I wonder if you'd be up to creating a template for the SF piers? At a glance, and in addition to #35, we have articles on Pier 70, San Francisco; Pier 26 (San Francisco, California); Pier 41; Pier 39. This way we could standardize them and work on them systematically. --Rosiestep (talk) 04:23, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

We have Template:SFBay Ferry Terminals, but I guess that all the piers wouldn't be ferry terminals.♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:04, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

For your phallic architecture article

It is a new church in Dixon, Illinois. https://www.google.com/maps?ll=41.842023,-89.485885&spn=0.000647,0.001215&sll=41.841684,-89.485292&t=h&z=20 Bgwhite (talk) 05:43, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Good grief. Yes I think I saw that a week or two ago on something.♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:57, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Nice addition

at Phallic architecture. We need to keep it up. PS I too miss the Orange Bar of Death. Ah for the good old days. Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 18:07, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Yes, sadly we have to put up with that silly number thing now..♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:09, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Gabon

Yeah - it's one of the few that I remember having to pass on, way back when. Guyana, too (I wonder if they ever sorted that out? I seem to recall some major discrepancies between their government websites regarding the names of various districts.) Good to see they've finally come online...just like just about everyone else these days.

Nice work on those Estonian composers, by the way - and quite timely, too. Guess what I'm going to hear tomorrow night... --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 20:40, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

I might look into it when I have the time. I've been playing around a lot with Flickr2Commons lately, too - found a wonderful collection of images from Virginia State Parks, for starters. (We had 4 on Commons before - we now have some 10-15,000.) --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 20:46, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Not really...they're released by the state parks department, actually. But it's nice to have something to fill the gap. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 20:49, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Mmm - might be some fodder for further exploration there. Mauritius, for instance. *sigh* I wish I had the time and the patience to do something with it all again. Maybe in a few days, or a week... --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 21:01, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Well, the problem is that we need more people with real-world experience of the places in question. Obvious, perhaps, but that's what we're up against. I've seen a lot of improvement in some quarters over the past few years, but there are some places where we really need to think about outreach.

I've suggested before looking into working with certain expatriate communities in places like the US, because I think there's a lot of good that could come from it. Nothing's been done, though. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 21:16, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Well, that's part of it - part of it is considering what kinds of sources are going to be available. For a lot of cultures, African and otherwise, sourcing is going to come from oral traditions instead. I know there's been some discussion of how to handle oral sources instead of written, but for right now I suspect that's a big barrier we have to deal with. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 21:47, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Scholars are doing more research, and more of that research is appearing online in more easily-accessible formats. The amount of what's available now, versus what was available even three or four years ago, is staggering. The same goes for image-gathering for Commons - it's phenomenal, the wealth of things now available. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 21:57, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

One of my worst-ever, if I do say so myself. I'm pretty good at pretty bad wordplay. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 21:48, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Indian villages

Some are obviously very old. Most are just recent clusters of shacks with no history, no sources ... The top down approach is to make sure there are at least articles for the higher-level administrative divisions, down to the level of Mandal / Revenue Circle / Taluka / C.D. Block. These should exist, but I suspect they do not. I wish demographics were available since I cannot see using 2001 figures when the 2011 figures are due any week now, sometime soon, maybe after the next election ... As for the bottom-up approach, the villages, my guess is that a lot of them, most of them, are not and never will be notable. I do not see redirecting them to sub-districts unless they are at least mentioning in the sub-district article, but Ausgram II (community development block)#Villages does not work for me at all. On the other hand, trying to get the unsourced villages deleted through AfD would be a hopeless job. Aymatth2 (talk) 01:07, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

The old and long Imperial Gazeteer of India here might be useful for starting a few such pieces. Over at wikisource:User:John Carter I have a rather longish list of older reference works now in the PD which might be useful. The old Cambridge History of India here should be able to provide at least some brief mentions of some as well. But, yeah, a lot of these villages and other small locations, and marginally notable people too, might not have enough information for stand-alone articles here. But, if we had more input over there, particularly in the matter of developing links between pages there, which I think is one of the criteria the search engines use to determine position in search returns, we could probably get that information that is in those older sources more quickly and easily available, and, if there are enough of them with enough material, maybe get separate stand-alone articles here. Just an idea, anyway. John Carter (talk) 22:36, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

I want to help with this as I see its importance. I agree that at the least, let's work top down, as you suggest, Aymatth, and assure we have appropriate coverage down to the mandals (and similar municipal divisions). Where to start? --Rosiestep (talk) 00:04, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

A full list is available on http://vlist.in/ . If we could organize a bot to create a full list by mandal this would be good but it would require 2200 odd pages. Then we could begin redirecting some of the lesser notable villages. My feeling on India though is that we should probably try to clean up the major cities and towns first.♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:11, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Finnish films

Thanks for the thanks! Another under-represented area in the film department. Time to FINNISH the job.... Chortle. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 07:31, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Larabanga Mosque

The DYK project (nominate) 08:02, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Elephant hunting in Chad

The DYK project (nominate) 16:03, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Museums in Kiev

The DYK project (nominate) 00:05, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

I expanded an existing article Chongoni Rock Art Area in to this User:Nvvchar/sandbox/Chongoni Rock Art Area, Malawi a few days back in case you wish to transfer it to RBN and edit. But it is expanded by an additional 6,000 ch with references.--Nvvchar. 08:32, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Festival Theatre, Malvern

Strangely enough, the only thing that went through this bowl of petunias' mind when somebody nominated their two sentence stub to AfD was "oh no, not again"....

An excellent 5x expansion of an article there, sir. I'm feeling charitable ... see here. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 11:37, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the thanks, much appreciated! I didn't get anything yesterday but unpleasantries at the expansion. I'll further add to it later today. Deor seems to think we're being paid top dollar to write for wikipedia doesn't he. Yes I was going to alert you to The Who window event which I though would interest you but you beat me to it! That chronological diary type book on the Who looks terrific, do you have it?♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:53, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

I do indeed. I don't think I could have got The Who to GA status without it. For dates, facts and figures, it is the source to use. It's also got stats on all the original record releases, and although another editor cited a different book for some chart positions, if anyone ever questions that, I've got a backup source. I'm not sure about going to FAC at the moment, for the simple reason that the band are still active and appearing in the music magazines, so it's too darn unstable - this morning I woke up, found about 7-8 changes by IPs and thought "oh no, not again". Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 12:03, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Yeah part of the writing core article to GA/FA is the responsibility to revert vandalism and crap edits all the time. And of course the mass hysteria of minor issues like in the Peter Sellers article. If you're having to deal with that amount of ips though I think you could probably get it semi-protected at the very least. You should ask and show evidence of why it is badly needed. That should save you at least from the niggling ips.♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:09, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

If it was all or mostly vandalism, that would be easy, but it's generally minor things like rewording or small copyedits, which are fine - as long as somebody doesn't inadvertently falsify information from a book source in the process. I don't think I've got a particularly strong case for it being semi'd. Plus there are a bunch of regular editors who mean well but their WP:COMPETENCE means they end up like a bull in a china shop for any article above start class, and WP:AGF pretty much means you can't just get rid of them. I occasionally get "nice" messages on my talk page like this where I was trying to improve an article to GA, and was not happy to put up with tagging unsourced content as . Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 12:17, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Ah yes, the good old regular "nice" talk page messages...♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:27, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

WP:CANVASS - You have heard of it, right?

How is this not canvassing? --NeilN ^{talk to me} 17:29, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

How is that canvassing? I don't expect votes. I just want knowledgeable people to set the record straight that there is NO consensus to have an infobox in every article in the way that I was once told that there is no consensus on that page..♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:43, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Yet you chose to post on a user talk page of an editor who shares similar views on infoboxes as you instead of posting on one of the community talk pages. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 18:09, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

I really don't see what the point of this and what your posts here are trying to achieve, especially as Giano has clearly stated that he doesn't like to post on pages of articles he doesn't edit. Oh and I suggest you read my user page, especially the section about WP:XXX waring. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:16, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Spelling it out: I thought you were canvassing - please don't do it again (you didn't know that Giano would decline to participate on the article's talk page). And I read WP:XXX warring - not very helpful in a lot of cases as what you see as "common sense" may be decidedly different from what I see as common sense. Exhibit A: This conversation. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 18:25, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Obviously you don't know me too well Neil to speak that way here. I'll do whatever I feel is appropriate at any time of the day, I'm not dictated by what a bunch of children have decided is "policy". If I'd gone and mass posted on dozens of talk page "please vote oppose" then you'd have a point and it might be considered disruptive to the site and the editors involved. It's entirely within my right to ask for somebody to clear up a situation. Usually I try to do it myself as I did with the Jewish issue but I thought that Oakshade would listen more to the others. I went to Giano because I was once told on his talk page that there was no wide consensus for the use of infoboxes in architecture articles. I wasn't hoping for "votes" I was hoping for somebody to clearly set the record straight that they aren't universally accepted and tell Oakshade what he once said to me. As it turns out Giano has been most helpful in providing me with a link to state the case, so my "canvassing" has actually been productive.♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:35, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

• Please User: NeilN do not have presumption to assume that Dr. Blofeld and I agree on anything. To do so shows not only an ignorance on your part, but a grave disrespect to an editor of whom you know nothing and have had no dealings. You really need to change your attitude or you won't last long here.  Giano  19:10, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

@Giano:, I wrote that you share similar views on infoboxes based on this and I see no reason to change my thinking. And given that I've been editing here for years (yes, I'm aware you may not call it "editing") without getting hauled to ANI and causing large amounts of drama I think I'll skip the attitude adjustment, thanks. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 20:08, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Exactly, if I was going to go and canvass mass support Giano wouldn't exactly be my first choice, as much as I respect him. I find this sort of thing annoying when an editor who knows nothing about the situation or editors and lectures them and starts branding WP:xxx at people. Giano's golden rule stated on his talk page are very wise words and apply to you, me and anybody else here. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:17, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

I suggest NeilN that you read WP:CANVASS properly and you will see that throwing this guideline at Doc is completely groundless. Doc went to a fellow, respected editor to ask for advice as the situation is dragging along like king king kong's testicle in a wind tunnel. Your previous history of you and your unhealthy obsession around idiot boxes precedes you, and Doc's very neutral message to others is merely an invite for a more rounded discussion as opposed to what you seem to be suggesting. --Cassianto^Talk 19:13, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

So Neil is involved with supporting one of the most obsessive and disruptive aspects of wikipedia at the moment, pushing infoboxes, yet he asks me not to be disruptive as if he's some neutral person passing by? ♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:38, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Commenting on one talk page that I had on my watchlist is "supporting one of the most obsessive and disruptive aspects of wikipedia" and an "unhealthy obsession"? I mean, I'm aware of Cassianto's compulsive preoccupation with deleting them but come on. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 20:08, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

He is indeed Doc, yes. Perhaps NeilN you might explain my "compulsive" behaviour with this edit which I did the other day. Although, I suspect you can't and your just chatting shite. --Cassianto^Talk 20:18, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

@Cassianto Contrast your post with mine. Who has the obsession? --NeilN ^{talk to me} 20:26, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

You do. When have you ever deleted one? --Cassianto^Talk 20:55, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Neil, you may or not be involved in trying to push infoboxes on multiple articles, I don't know you or hat you do here, but believe you me, infoboxes have caused far more trouble than they're worth and we've lost or almost lost very valuable editors over them. They're an afterthought, given that there's such an extreme amount of work needed on here across the site its sort of criminal to be involved in going about the site trying to push them. They're not important. I support infoboxes for things like settlements, airplanes, even things like footballers which have a lot of data, but for most biographies they're really redundant and have very real value. It saddens me that a certain group of editors think they're so important that they'll waste weeks of valuable time trying to push them on articles which have already been developed to FA yet 95% of the website is badly in need of basic editing. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:31, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Okay, and I respect your point of view, but I can also see value in what the other side is saying and unless we can come up with a new community guideline regarding infoboxes (hope springs eternal), local consensus will rule and you'll be facing these wearying fights on every article. NeilN ^{talk to me} 20:45, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

User:FrB.TG

I notice you were recently involved with this user. They have now found AFC (and started reviewing), and FLC. As you are probably more familiar with the (possible) sockmaster conserned, I wanted to ask you if it was likely to be them (also tagging others involved in original discussion 123). --Mdann52talk to me! 08:38, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Considering that the CU that was done came up negative... --Rschen7754 08:43, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Some initial concerns were made that he was a sock of User:Prashant!, but that clearly isn't the case and this editor is based in Norway. It is certainly odd for somebody to edit as he has and really be a newbie and I wasn't aware that Norway had people interested in Bollywood cinema but it is apparently the case. As nothing shows up on CU I don't there's anything we can do. Perhaps allow him to create an article and see how he fares? ♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:36, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Your article Ullíbarri Arrazua

Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page Ullíbarri Arrazua to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It currently has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:59, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Elizabeth Timothy

I made a major expansion to the article. How do I get the WikiProjects reevaluated? Do you know of any other WikiProjects that should be added?--Doug Coldwell (talk) 14:03, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Looks good Uncle Dougie, I don't know maybe WikiProject Netherlands? You're free to reassess the article.♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:30, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

I've reassessed it as C class but you need to expand the lead to summarize the article. The article concentrates a bit too much on "Timothy's husband" I think and needs some restructuring before it's B class. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:39, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

O.K., thanks!--Doug Coldwell (talk) 14:57, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

At the end of the day it's her bio not her husband's; IMO you should move the material about her husband to his own article and only briefly document what is relevant to Elizabeth.♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:02, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

• Yes, agree. Looks like a project for me in the next few days. Thanks for suggestions.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 15:04, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
• FYI, I created the article on Timothy's husband back in 2008. Will be working on your suggestions in the next few days.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 15:51, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
• Have made improvements (trimmed and moved over to Lewis Timothy) and added sub-headers. Thanks for your suggestions. Appreciate it!--Doug Coldwell (talk) 22:51, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
• Can you tell me in the WikiProjects if " |listas=Timothy, Elizabeth }} " is correct.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 22:51, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Seems that way doesn't it.♦ Dr. Blofeld 23:20, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Wells Cathedral

What ho, Doctor! I have just had the pleasure of peer reviewing this article, and I rather think you might enjoy doing so too if you have time. I've flagged it up chez KJP1, too. Ever thine, Tim riley (talk) 21:17, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Kahuzi-Biéga National Park

Follow-up on Nv's talkpage. --Rosiestep (talk) 03:24, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Can you please look at it one more time? --Rosiestep (talk) 05:04, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Belanting, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bayan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Fifteentoonescandal.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Fifteentoonescandal.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. RJaguar3 | u | t 05:24, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Samuel Benedict (film producer)

The article Samuel Benedict (film producer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable producer; requires significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. None provided, nor found in Google News.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

I did not PROD it, but whoever did, failed to notify you.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:59, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	What great improvements for Elizabeth Timothy. Thanks! Doug Coldwell (talk) 12:40, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Thanks! Not as good as yours though!♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:29, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Wow! What a compliment, coming from you. Thank you.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 13:39, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Hotcat

Some would say he's yawning, not blushing, but hey, he's your cat.

Dr. B and/or talkpage stalkers: I lost hotcat during the Visual Editor debacle. I tried removing hotcat and restoring it. I asked for assistance at Wikipedia_talk:HotCat#Hotcat not working. Now, I'm just tired of not having it. Any ideas? (I use Firefox on a MacBook Air.) --Rosiestep (talk) 18:15, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Are you flirting with Mr Bigglesworth and calling him a hot cat? He's been known to be popular with the ladies but he's now blushing!! LOL. try going into gadgets in your preference and ensuring that HotCat is ticked and click save.♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:20, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Checked and HotCat was ticked/saved. --Rosiestep (talk) 18:33, 17 November 2013 (UTC) . Chortle. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 19:04, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Hahah that's a Bigglesworth LMAO moment if ever I've seen one!! Perhaps they can help you at the village pump tech Rosie?♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:01, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Change browers just to add a cat? Whhaatt?

Told you changing browsers wouldn't work, but you never listen!

I tried the village pump tech, too, and they're the folks who sent me to the hotcat project page. One thing I didn't try is login with another browser. Will try that but I can't see my self shifting browers routinely just to deal with cats. --Rosiestep (talk) 00:11, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Tried using Chrome... but HotCat was not still not available. Buggers. --Rosiestep (talk) 00:40, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

LOL those eyes!!!♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:08, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Like Sohambanerjee1998 09:49, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Festival Theatre, Malvern

The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Concise Wikipedia

At [1] there is now a template at the top of the page indicating some questions which would apparently have to be answered before the Concise Wikipedia might be made up and running. As the person who proposed the project, I have a feeling you would probably be the best one to fill in those slots in the table. John Carter (talk) 00:58, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Cascade Centar

The article Cascade Centar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable?

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 06:43, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

I think it has enough coverage in Croatian media to be considered notable. It needs expansion though. If we can have hundreds upon hundreds of malls in the US with articles we can surely have 3 articles on malls in somewhere like Croatia..♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:42, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Indian villages

What was the outcome of the Indian villages problem? I just seen 75 tyallur using NPP. - Sitush (talk) 11:54, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

No idea! The reaction was mixed I think. Probably best to just get on with it, but in thinking about it maybe it's just better to go through and cleanup the articles, the lists need a huge amount of work and there is of course thousands of missing articles by district. I think redirecting some of the empty village stubs for now to the districts would probably be a good idea.♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:06, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

OK, I'll redirect the one I mention above - it is the usual crap. - Sitush (talk) 12:16, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Or redirect to mandal of course, but the mandal is probably likely to be bad too!♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:24, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

It is. - Sitush (talk) 12:39, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Barnstar

Do you think it was necessary? Any way thanks.--Nvvchar. 14:18, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for that Asturian barnstar! Really cool and probably one of a kind. --Rosiestep (talk) 15:55, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Sure; I'll look at both of them after work. --Rosiestep (talk) 16:05, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

• I don't think there is much on Oman in general in the 19th century. A minor point on line breaks: see Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Accessibility#Line breaks at end of sentences. A small point, but they can help a bit. Aymatth2 (talk) 20:51, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
  • I am using a fairly standard-size Dell laptop. It is a combination of poor vision and poor coordination. Sometimes it is hard to see the cursor when it is inside the text. Easier to see it when it is in the white space that follows a line. Also, sometimes a bit hard to position precisely, both start and end positions, inside the text. Sticking it somewhere after the end of the line then hold and drag to the left-hand margin is easier. Not a big deal. As for the lead, the museum bit was almost as long as the body section. I like short leads, max one sentence per paragraph, so the reader gets an overview very quickly. Aymatth2 (talk) 21:17, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
    • I probably see less clutter on a smaller screen, which spreads the images apart. There would be no clutter on a phone, becoming the standard viewing device. I think the ones in the body of the article are different enough to be worth keeping. I agree that the gallery pics are a bit redundant, but always hate to omit a picture because usually there are never enough. One of the gallery close views of the landward end should be kept. The third is probably best at 220px resolution. All these images should be in one category on Commons. Then the article could point to them with a commonscat. Aymatth2 (talk) 21:48, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Port of Skagen

Gatoclass (talk) 08:02, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Trichy

Hi, regarding the post independence history, "Mutharasanallur Bombings" and "Anti-Hindi agitations" are notable ones that are connected to the city. Besides these, the city had been the seat for numerous political conferences organised in the state. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 17:00, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:HerveVillechaize.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:HerveVillechaize.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{Non-free fair use}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dman41689 (talk) 20:02, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

November 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Larak Island may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• ] points since 1987.The narrowest part of the [[Strait of Hormuz]] at distance of {{convert|24|mi}}} lies between the island and the Omani-owned [[Quoin Islands]].<ref name="Joyner1990">{{cite book|

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:14, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Xazorasp may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• '''Xazorasp''' (also '''Hazorasp''' or '''Khazarasp''' ({{lang-uz|Xazorasp}}, {{lang-fa|هزاراسپ}}), [[Uzbekistan]],

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:13, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Navbox Copenhagen

How do you choose what to include? There's already a template for districts, so should they be repeated? There are 18 art museums, tons of schools, etc. etc. etc. Where to start? --Rosiestep (talk) 03:54, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Ear Mountain LOL.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ear Mountain LOL.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 19:37, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Wadi Halfa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Kitchener and Middle Kingdom

Al Mahwit (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Qat

Larak Island (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Dwt

Naudero (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to PMLQ

SS Nubian (1876) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Union Steamship Company

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Copenhagen

I was on the point of thanking you for your assistance with editing aids and your encouragement for me to move out of Internet Explorer, both of which I think are now beginning to help with my contributions to Copenhagen and related articles. I am therefore a bit surprised about your recent comments on my citations. Maybe my infrequent use of sources from "books" has something to do with my use of sources in Danish which are not immediately transparent to most English-speaking readers, especially Gyldendal's encyclopaedia Den Store Danske (I have the complete set of "books" on my shelves at home) and the informative Visit Denmark or Visit Copenhagen sites. I can nevertheless assure you that the lack of references to "books" is not in any way a result of my limited searching. On every area I have dealt with up to now, I have systematically looked for pertinent sources from Google Books (and also from Danish libraries and the European Library) but in most cases have not been able to find anything really up to date to fit the object of the exercise. The main problem with the article has been that it was based mainly on an expansion around 2008/2009 when most of the development took place. I have looked carefully at all the older sources (where they exist and are still accessible) and have not only updated dead links but have added a considerable number of current sources from what I consider to be reliable material. I have also called on Ramblersen (our top expert on Copenhagen) to help and have been following up on his extremely useful advice (see User:Ramblersen/Sandbox11). I have also adopted all your suggestions regarding "cite web" referencing (which I have been using systematically), use of Firefox rather than Internet Explorer (although here I am still experiencing some minor problems) and the incorporation of your latest editing aids. It is therefore rather disconcerting to hear that my work is somehow substandard and that I should be changing my approach. I remember not too long ago I was accused of not being "collaborative" on these assignments. I think I have made about 170 edits (most specifically designed to add content, update information and provide inline references where none previously existed) compared to about 30 from you and hardly anything from anyone else. Perhaps I should just leave it all for a while and wait for others to catch up! (Unfortunately, I do not know of anyone ready to do the spadework.)

Please do not take this too critically. It is more an explanation of my editing approach. On a more positive note, I am pleased to see that there has finally been one small improvement in the Copenhagen montage.

After I have been through the remainder of Ramblersen's points, I will add inline refs to the other sections of the article, create separate articles on those items which require them, add more meaningful background on notable people, and then try to compile something on the items that are still completely missing (e.g. Religion and perhaps Future planning). Maybe you would like to go through the items on Demography and Administration which you have handled so efficiently in the past on similar articles. All this will take time but we do not have to meet a deadline. A week or two more will not be a problem. As far as I am concerned, any improvement is a step in the right direction, whether or not we reach GA. But I am sure we'll get there soon. Just look at all the problems with the Danish and Norwegian articles, both rated GA.--Ipigott (talk) 15:46, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

You just do not realize how critical your remarks can be. I thought "substandard" was a rather mild description of your assessment of my sourcing. You should just reread your comments and put yourself on the receiving end. It all comes over as: "Just carry on the same old way and I'll come in later and add all the book references you should have found in the first place if you'd followed my instructions!" You compare the references in the Copenhagen article to those on Marrakesh. To be quite honest, I would have steered clear of many of the tourist guides used to reference that article but realize that as not many of us read Arabic, they were probably a useful second best. In the case of Copenhagen I am sure you could find similar references from English-language tourist guides available on the internet for virtually any sentence in the article. I am also frequently surprised by "book" references from dated editions cited as background for items concerning recent developments. (Our friends on RBN were expert at using them.) Many of the "book" references you use are based on Google snippets which often do not tell the full story and can even be misleading. I have often had to correct misunderstandings which have resulted from additions to some of my Danish articles, for example. Furthermore, I did inform you when we started working on Copenhagen that had I been in Denmark, I could undoubtedly have found excellent literature through the library services to help out with both the research and the sourcing (as I was able to do when we were working together on Aalborg). Unfortunately I will not be back in Denmark for another two or three months. I don't think it would hurt to wait a few more months but I've now been encouraging Ramblersen to take part too. In the light of your comments, though, I think that rather than try to reduce the amount of unsourced material, I should perhaps be working more or other aspects. I'll see how I feel about it all tomorrow.--Ipigott (talk) 16:43, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Barnstar

Hello Dr. Blofeld

Much honored by the recognition, THANK YOU! Surely, it'll help to boost my morale to continue working in the same(better?) order. Have a good day, Sir. Best regards, (MrNiceGuy1113 (talk) 11:02, 24 November 2013 (UTC))

Lovely little church

Glad that you enjoyed it!

Amandajm (talk) 16:09, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Copenhagen montage

Sorry, very busy IRL. I can work on this, but how do you want the images arranged? Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 05:27, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

OK, that looks good (though with fewer images than the original request). Sorry I was so slow, Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 19:29, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Rena Koh for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rena Koh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rena Koh until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mabalu (talk) 10:30, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Nothing personal, didn't realise this was one of yours. I did do a quick check for sources, but couldn't see anything in-depth - and as I said in nom - am happy to withdraw if sources are found. Just picked up on it after a doozey category-spammed every big name designer they could think of as a "wedding dress designer" (just because someone designs a few bridal gowns as a tiny percentage of a much bigger output does not make them Vera Wang unless they are famous for bridal gowns generally) and I went through the category to double check that everyone could be described as a wedding dress designer - found a few apparent non-notables. Mabalu (talk) 10:54, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Turtling (sailing)

Herr Doctor, Any of your wise counsel on how to improve this article (and additions, should you deign to do them) would be appreciated. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 14:44, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Not something I really know much about I'm afraid.♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:51, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

I thought you the ubiquitous fount of knowledge, and knew it all. Cheers. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 14:55, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Benedictine monasteries in Catalonia

Created the template {{Benedictine monasteries in Catalonia}}. Number one! I thought I liked the idea of Ruins as a separate group, but probably would be better to split them into the 4 provinces instead. Maybe tomorrow. Tons more to add... working out of my sandbox. Haven't decided yet about renaming the Spanish ones (San) into Catalan (Sant) for conformity. --Rosiestep (talk) 22:09, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Yes, could use some help. I've split them up by province. I'm going to create the redlinks today. All the articles which fall under Bien de Interés Cultural will need to be linked to the right list, and the lists will need updating with the appropriate monastery. --Rosiestep (talk) 23:07, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Redlinks aplenty. Renamed one article. Figured out that they're located in 3 of the 4 provinces... none in Tarragona. It feels good to have this sorted out. I changed out the coats of arms for one photo. --Rosiestep (talk) 02:27, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Santa Maria de Serrateix looks quite nice. I've been inclined as of late to go with commonscat-inline vs. having the commons box on the far right, but it's just my preference and not a suggestion. We could spend a year working all the Bien de Interés Cultural articles on all the comarcas! I found the lists to be incomplete when I started working on these Benedictine monasteries (and I haven't gotten around to adding them to the lists yet). And most of the landmarks which are on the list don't have an en article. Like I've said a jillion times, lots of article-building still to be done. Where are all the Spanish-English bilingual college students and why don't they help with this?? --Rosiestep (talk) 16:44, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

I'm still working on the Benedictine monasteries in Catalonia, but started these 2 structures nonetheless, and thought they might interest you: Ciutadella de Roses and Castell de la Trinitat. No worries if you're busy with other things. --Rosiestep (talk) 17:04, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

William Beaudine

Sure thing. I'll run it when I get home tonight. It'll be late, as I have rehearsal tonight, but I should be able to get to it before I go to bed. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 14:52, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Any time. It'll make a nice change from the moths I've been piddling around with. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 14:54, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

I looked at it, honest. I even contemplated starting the BBA page. There are thousands of pictures, which must prove something. I married one and gave away one, but I realize I just don't known anything about them. Still, I will watch this discussion with considerable interest. Aymatth2 (talk) 17:20, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Will do. I'll have a look tonight. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 22:35, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

November 2013 GA Thanks

This user has contributed to The Great Ziegfeld good articles on Wikipedia.

On behalf of WP:CHICAGO, I thank you for your editorial contributions to The Great Ziegfeld, which recently was promoted to WP:GA.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 17:56, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Thanks Tony! Always good to get an Academy Award winning film up to GA!♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:01, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

To crore or not to crore

Please take a look at the latest comments concerning currencies and my replies in Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Mughal-e-Azam/archive1. Do you know why some of those FAs did not use crore or lakh? Also, several people have suggested over time that the soundtrack be split out into its own article. Do you think it is needed and now is a good time to do it? BollyJeff | talk 18:26, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Are you going to ask other editors for input? This nom is getting pretty low on the list without much action, except from Dwaipayanc. BollyJeff | talk 18:46, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Give it a week or two and see what happens.♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:45, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Fort Al Jalali

The article Fort Al Jalali you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Fort Al Jalali for comments about the article. Well done! SabreBD (talk) 20:28, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Thanks!!♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:31, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Orange bar of doom protest

Not sure if you were already aware, but you can get the orange bar back with importScript('User:Writ Keeper/Scripts/orangeBar.js');. I for one just couldn't let go. :) – Juliancolton | ^Talk 21:35, 27 November 2013 (UTC) Interesting. Does it affect it though when people thankyou for things if you return to the orange bar?♦ Dr. Blofeld 22:18, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Wells Cathedral

Thanks for the note about Wells Cathedral. The more the merrier as far as I'm concerned.— Rod ^talk 16:24, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

Merry is not quite the adjective that I would have used ;-)  Giano  18:56, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

Why's that Giano?♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:58, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

Just a joke Dr B; just a joke (of sorts); no particular reason.  Giano  19:14, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

I see something disagreeable happened with Amanda and Eric, I guess that's what you mean! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:18, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

(edit conflict)That comment may relate to previous conflicts about which word should be used, and related conflicts. I am hopeful that the discussions about almost every word in the article will (one day) stabilise into something of FA standard.— Rod ^talk 19:19, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

I see, well the article seemed excellent to me and I think with a bit of polish should pass.♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:21, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

And Giano with the little jokels, was there, as usual, to take a few pecks at Eric Corbett's victims. How very surprising to find these comments on your page, Dr Blofeld! Amandajm (talk) 08:14, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

I thought you and Eric were on good terms Amanda? I'm sure I've seen your name thanking him for copyediting at one time or other and him praising your architectural work.♦ Dr. Blofeld 09:55, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Brislington House

I see you've added a Country House category to Brislington House. I'm not sure how country house is defined but I don't think Brislington House fits my mental concept of a country house: asylum, nurses home, nursing home & then private flats.— Rod ^talk 16:29, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

Sri lankan Tamils

Hi, has Sri Lankan pilgrims being attacked in Velankanni got anything to do with Trichy, or I'm missing something? —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 17:37, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

I thought that them being attacked near the Trichy airport in the bus on the way back was worthy of mentioning? Depends on where the attack took place exactly I guess but the source indicates that they were only harassed in Velankanni and the actual attack took place on their bus near the airport. If it was outside the municipality then probably not worth mentioning.♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:39, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

I can't think of any obvious GA candidates. I usually just try to give a reasonable overview. Aymatth2 (talk) 19:10, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

See 1839 - extended to 20km. It needs a reviewer who speaks Foreign. Aymatth2 (talk) 19:58, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

In 1609 Antoine de Buade sold Paul Phélypeaux de Pontchartrain the Château de Pontchartrain, later purchased by Auguste Dreyfus, a French financier, as was Jacques Schneider, grandson of Adolphe Schneider, employer of François Bourdon, designer of the Steam hammer (later used in the Low Moor Ironworks: "no pen can write, no mind can soar, to tell the wonders of Low Moor") and a colleague of Claude Verpilleux, who built a locomotive that made the Givors canal obsolete. Aymatth2 (talk) 02:10, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Blue whale penis for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Blue whale penis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blue whale penis until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Ryulong (琉竜) 03:53, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Fashion Model (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Robert Lowery and John Valentine

List of American films of 1945 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Robert Lowery and Tim Ryan

Gyan Dutt (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Musafir

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Wells Cathedral

Thanks for your input. Amandajm (talk) 14:20, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

De nada, thanks for your work on it!♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:24, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

FYI

Could you have a look at this? Maybe some insight from an experienced editor like yourself might help. I think it would be a shame if this person left the project. Thanks. - ^theWOLFchild 21:05, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Not sure what I can do. YM just looks like he had a disagreement over an article and had to take some abuse and has said that moments like that make him want to leave. This is part of wiki editing, rarely a week goes by that I don't encounter an ass on here. Give it a few days and it'll blow over. As far as I can see YM hasn't put up a retired notice. He knows he's a valued editor here.♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:14, 30 November 2013 (UTC)