User:Doreme1248

Hello. I was the account holder of "Ilovehk1248" of Chinese Wikipedia.

I was blocked on 8 April 2006.

I was blocked for saying the FACT that the Foreign Minsiter of Australia Alexander Downer is sued by Falungong members, which is widely published by most Australian media.

I was blocked for saying the FACT that Jiang Zemin is prosecuted in many countries for genocide.

I was blocked for mentioning the RCMP is monitoring 45 Chinese officials.

I was blocked for mentioning that most of the Hong Kong democratic legislators concern and support Falun Gong members in anti-prosecution movement.

I was blocked for saying things which are VERIFIABLE.

Administrators are doing censorship on Chinese Wikipedia!! Mainland Chinese administrators or administrators with mainland China background threre are on Chinese Wikipedia to keep all articles "politically correct".

I need WIKIPEDIAN's HELP.

Abuse of administrator power: Gaining an advantage in a content dispute by blocking

Chinese Wikipedian adminisitrators DENY that THEY GAINED AN ADVANTAGE IN A CONTENT DISPUTE INVOLVING WHETHER MOST ARTICLES SHOULD INVOLVE FALUN GONG MATERIALS BY BLOCKING ME? Wikipedia: Blocking policy says "Use of blocks to gain an advantage in a content dispute is strictly prohibited. That is, sysops must not block ediors with whom they are currently engaged in a content dispute." They have NEVER answered this question. Even if they answer this question in the future, their answer would never be satisfying.

Indeed, what they are suggesting is: Media with a Falun Gong background such as Epoch Times, Renminbao, Minghui are all UNRELIABLE SOURCES that should not be depended on. But Xinhua of China, is fine to be put into Wikipdeia.

Take a further example of how absurd they are: I mentioned that in the article of Alexander Downer, that Alexander Downer was sued by Falun gong and that Alexander Downer reconciled. I gave links such as Austrian ABC and other. Indeed, if you googled about it, you will know that you can get this information from websites other than media with Falungong.

Take one more further example: in the article of Chen yonglin, a deflector of Chinese government, it was mentioned that he has "a suspicious record of crimes of corruption" and that's why he deflected to Australia. However, no links were given to prove that there are such records when they are asked. I can't even find a link on Google about this. NOT A VERFIABLE FACT. However, administrators in Chinese Wikipedia let such UNVERFIABLE FACTS left on the article for very long until I revert it. Why? Everyone should know the answer.

After all, they are creating religious discrimination on the Internet, telling you: Whatever Falungong says are not credible and must not be trusted and must not be even mentioned in Wikipedia except the articles of [[Falun gong] Nine commentaries Falun gong is not allowed to be mentioned in any other articles, so as to created the image that no one cares Falun gong. This is not true!! Most Hong Kong legislators care Falungong and (protested about it), BBC care Falungong ...... Of course, we also understand that most Big Chinese media and businesses dare not to care about Falun Gong - Who doesn't want to make money in the Chinese market?

An anti-wikipedia web site http://www.wikipediareview.com (The "attack site policy" has failed! Don't rely any stupid excuse to remove my link, Wikipedians!)