User:Chrislk02/archive15

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is Chrislk02's talk page archive for the months of March and April 2009. Please do not edit anything on this page, but direct all coments to my active talk page. Thanks!

March 2009

April 2009

Hello

I asked you a few month ago to delete the talk-page about Rabbi Chaim Walkin [september 2008], since every search on google shows the details of the talk. since the page is up and the importance is clear, try to avoid the details from coming up on google and I will thank you. --93.173.250.16 (talk) 02:16, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Nope

Nope, I don't think so. Not in Wikipedia at least, this is my first account. Jcm431 (talk) 17:07, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

More socks for you to play with. :P

It's Sinofdreams. I have been kinda wikibonked, so I didn't get I chance to tell you. Look at his contribs and look at the edits to my talk page. I don't know why he keeps coming to me.

I'm suspicious about him, as he edits the same pages as MM12. [1], and [2]. TPS seems to edit wrestling more than MM12. At this point, I just don't know. Have fun. :P SimonKSK 16:20, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

    •  DoneThey are either socks or meat puppets. editing on conjunction, articles under similar categories. I added them to the barneca page of socks and blocked them. Thanks for the heads up.
No problem. SimonKSK 17:32, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Yet another sock. This one is really obvious. Smashville might block before you though. SimonKSK 19:08, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Undid a revision on SimonKSK's talkpage restoring the message from I-AM-SIMONKSKS-SOCK that Simon himself had deleted. Sole edit thus far. HAZardousMATTtoxic 17:40, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

    • Thanks for the heads up! obviousley a pretty unintelligent individual. Chrislk02 Chris Kreider 18:42, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

173.58.134.110 Seems to have found Kalajan's sandbox. Might be worth looking into. HAZardousMATTtoxic 12:54, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Can that sandbox be put up for deletion since it's the userpage of an indef block? Just curious. HAZardousMATTtoxic 16:13, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
I am content using it as a honeypot. Chrislk02 Chris Kreider 18:13, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVI (February 2009)

The February 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:48, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Gerber Baby

Can I get semi-protection for this article that has been vandelized several times in the last 3 months? Thanks. --Doug Coldwell talk 20:50, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

The vandalism activity on that article is very low (there has not been enough vandalism activity in the past few months) to warrant any level of protection. I have however added it to my watchlist and if there is more vandalism will revert it. Hope this helps. Chrislk02 Chris Kreider 21:05, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Thanks, that will work! --Doug Coldwell talk 21:19, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Piracy participation update

Hello Chrislk02/archive15,

WikiProject Piracy is currently undergoing some updates and changes, and we are trying to find out who is still active in the project. You are currently listed as a participant on the list of participants, and we would like for you to update your status. Please move your name to the section that best describes your activity in the project:

  • Active - still active and interested within the scope of the WikiProject.
  • Semi-Active - still active on Wikipedia, but not as active in regards to the WikiProject.
  • Former Members - a catch-all classification for those editors who are not active on Wikipedia, those that are still on Wikipedia, but no longer part of this WikiProject, or those that have otherwise not moved their names to another classification yet.

Thank you,
Adolphus79 (talk) 16:50, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 13 March!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 18:23, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

user pages

apparently she did it by mistake and apologized. i still don't think its nice to do that kind of thing but oh well rules are rules.TomCat4680 (talk) 19:30, 10 March 2009 (UTC)


Hey, HELP

Hey chris remember me? I'm fattdoggy (Check your December 2006 and early 2007 archives if you don't remember me.) But I forgot how to make userboxes can you help me? JMS Old Al (talk) 22:09, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Another Thing

I'm in January 2007 archives. I still need help on making userboxes! JMS Old Al (talk) 22:12, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Military history WikiProject coordinator election

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. We will be selecting coordinators from a pool of eighteen to serve for the next six months. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on Saturday, 28 March! Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:27, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Hello?

I forgot how to make userboxes, help! JMS Old Al (talk) 00:09, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, I dont know how. I don't do anything with userboxes anymore. Look at WP:UBX. Chrislk02 Chris Kreider 00:10, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Les Henderson

The article Les Henderson has been listed for deletion. As you have in the past been involved in editing the (recently also deleted) section Talent scouting scandal on Lou Pearlman you may be interested in the deletion discussion. If you are, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Les Henderson (2nd nomination). Thank you. --WeatherFug (talk) 00:50, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVII (March 2009)

The March 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:11, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Hey, can you help?

I've made a few userboxes, and this one:

This user is tough on vandals.

I'd like to put up on the userbox page list thing. Do you know anybody who could help? Thanks, JMS Old Al (talk) 23:54, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Hey, can you help?

I've made a few userboxes, and this one:

This user is tough on vandals.

I'd like to put up on the userbox page list thing. Do you know anybody who could help? Thanks, JMS Old Al (talk) 23:55, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

I would ask for help on one of the talk pages associate to it. Try being bold and just doing it. If you get reverted, point them to this conversation and talk to the person who reverted you. Chrislk02 Chris Kreider 13:20, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Please look

Please read this and take a look. The editors here have performed a comparative analysis of different religions and formed a consesus to make a negative assertion on the validity of a religion. They are also asking me to perform this same exercise and accept the denial of validity. They have also used materials which perform this same exercise and make the claim and assertion that "x$ is not a religion". The editors have made a synthesis of their consensus and these materials. All these materials come from a sphere which has always been making ghastly claims and assertions on the religion in question. This sphere has not a single source from the religion in question, and has no love for the religion in question. It is like using the works of Nazi intellectuals to report that "Jews are not humans/less than humans". Here's the discussion. The whole article has already been identified as having weird language and claims and assertions with unpinnable attributions. Most problems are due to this.Civilizededucation (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 10:15, 21 April 2009 (UTC).
Hi Chris. I just saw your busy notice and think it is wholly inappropriate to bother you with a potentially time consuming matter at this juncture. Please forget this matter completely and do not let this interfere with your comminments. Just revert both my posts as soon as you see this. Please do not let this worry you in any way, I assure you, I can manage.Civilizededucation (talk) 04:29, 23 April 2009 (UTC)