User:Cassiopeia/NPPSchool/B.Korlah

Hello, welcome to your New Page Patrol School page! Every person I instruct will have their own page on which I will give them support and tasks for them to complete. Please make sure you have this page added to your watchlist. Your NPP School page has been specifically designed according to you and what you have requested instruction in - for that reason, please be as specific as possible when under my instruction, so that I know the best ways to help you (and do not be afraid to let me know if you think something isn't working).

Make sure you read through Wikipedia:Notability as that's the knowledge which most of the questions I ask you and tasks you do will revolve around.

How to use this page

This page will be built up over your time in the Academy, with new sections being added as you complete old ones. Each section will end with a task, written in bold type - this might just ask a question, or it might require you to go and do something. You can answer a question by typing the answer below the task; if you have to do something, you will need to provide diffs to demonstrate that you have completed the task. Some sections will have more than one task, sometimes additional tasks may be added to a section as you complete them. Please always sign your responses to tasks as you would on a talk page.

If both the instructor and student make completing the course curriculum a top priority, it will generally take around a month to go through the entirety of the curriculum. This pace is not required or necessarily expected, but rather is provided in order to give participants an idea of what to expect.

Notability

PART 1

When patrolling or reviewing an article, you may often come across articles do not meet the WP:N guidelines, but the editors make the edits in good faith. Please read WP:AGF and do not WP:BITE the new editors.

A. Notability is a test guidelines to decide whether a given topic warrants its own article in Wikipedia mainspace. Please read Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not, General Notability Guidelines, Specific Notability Guidelines, Stand-alone list before completing the following tasks.

General notability guidelines

1. In your own words, why it is important to WP:AGF and not WP:BITE new editors.

Answer: It is really important to WP:AGF because most times when a new comer starts editing Wikipedia, they get little or no knowledge about the specific rules and guidelines governing Wikipedia, so they just start creating articles in a bid to help the project, whereas they are hurting the project, so all that is needed is to guide them in the appropriate way and not to WP:BITE them.

For example, I had my fair share of experience, joining Wikipedia I though in WP:AGF, I could just be creating articles as I like about people I like or topics that interest me, I thought I was helping the project, I thought I was doing something good, but I learnt with all of this experience so WP:BITE new editors would only make them uninterested and leave the project (if care isn’t taken), so assuming WP:AGF is very important to retain new editors while also giving them the support and training needed (if possible).

Y. Assuming good faith is important as mistakes and Wikipedia policy breaches appear not because people intend to do harm, but due to their lack of knowledge of Wikipedia guidelines. Always behave in a civilized manner and avoid attacks on new editors which may result in unpleasant situations such as fights or their leave and subsequent loss to the community (this could have been a great editor). Cassiopeia talk 05:29, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

2. In your own words, how is notability defined in Wikipedia?

Answer: Notability is defined (in my own word) as the ability for a subject to meet a specific guideline set aside, in this case the - general notability guidelines such that the topic/subject has significant coverage, has sources (reliable sources) that are independent of the subject.

Y. In Wikipedia, notability means "worthy to be noted" - it is defined as a topic is "presumably" notable for stand-alone article or list if (1) it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject where by the sources talk "directly" about the subject in depth and in length and not only passing mentioned and (2) it is not excluded under the What WP:Wikipedia is not policy. Cassiopeia talk 05:29, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

3. Does a step by step instructions on how to "Change a car tire" considered a notable topic in Wikipedia?

Answer: A step by step instructions on how to ‘change a car tire’ doesn’t sound like a notable topic for Wikipedia to me, cause a step by step instructions sounds like a manual or guide instruction which Wikipedia is not, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and ‘Steps to change a car tire’ do not fit into an encyclopedia, so ‘Change a car tire’ is not considered a notable topic.

Y. As per WP:NOTMANUAL - Wikipedia allows descriptions of things but not imperative instructions on how to use them. Cassiopeia talk 05:29, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

4. What are the differences between A WP:GNG and a specific notability guidelines? how do we determine which one to use when patrolling an article?

Answer: The WP:GNG as the name implies are the general notability guidelines that guide the creation of an article on Wikipedia this means that they are the general rules and guidelines that has to be followed before a topic is deemed fit to deserve a stand alone article while the Specific notability guidelines are guidelines that are specific to a particular topic this means that while a subject/topic might not be notable under the WP:GNG, it might be under the specific notability guidelines, the specific notability guidelines help to show that a topic which has fulfiled some criteria could still be given time for improvement and to test for its notability before been deleted.

The major difference is that the WP:GNG is a major notability guidelines that guides all articles creation while WP:SNG are specific to some topics and helps to take a broader look on the article when it fails the WP:GNG but passes the WP:SNG

Y. Both can be used when patrolling but those subject falls under SNG/SSG (sport specific guidelines) but fails to meet the WP:GNG guidelines would sometimes nominated for deletion WP:AfD for discussion to determine the status of the article. (We will cover AfD in later assignment). Cassiopeia talk 05:29, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Specific notability guidelines

5. If an editor creates an article about "2024 Summer Olympics" in 2019 without providing any sources, is the subject considered not notable and why?

Answer: Without reliable and notable sources (reference), it is difficult to substantiate the notability of a subject, Wikipedia verifies the notability of a subject or topic by the sources added to back it up.

Y. The subject is considered notable as 1. it had widespread effect as an international event, 2. The host nation of Olympics games would usually be announced 8 years prior the event, so even the article might not have source, we, as the reviewers, would find the sources and add them in as good practice. Cassiopeia talk 05:29, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

B. Without considered of sources/content policies and review just based on "subject specific notability" (SSN) "alone" for sake of the exercises below, please answer if the subject meets the SSN guidelines, based on the given content below, and specify under (1) which notability criteria they meet or fail (example - MUSICBI#1 if certain sub set of criteria is applicable) and (2) reasons/explanations.

6. A New York city based 2021 start up software company , specializing in data mining, has just received a USD 200K investor fund.

Answer: 1. fails WP:CORPDEPTH 2. All it has is just a trivial coverage in brief announcement of a raised investor fund which doesn’t meet the WP:SNG

Y. Cassiopeia talk 05:29, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

7. Guram Kutateladze who is a Ultimate Fighting Championships fighters with the undefeated mixed martial arts record of 12-2. Answer:1. Meets WP:NTRACK 2. Have won individual award and recognition.

N. subject is a mixed martial arts fighter (mma fighter) and has nothing to do with NTRACK. Subject is not notable as per WP:NMMA. Cassiopeia talk 05:29, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

8. A upcoming action drama title "Suleiman the Great" based on the the life of Suleiman the Magnificent, was reported will be in production in December 2022 and to be released on August 2023 in the cinemas.

Answer: 1.fails WP:NFF 2. Film hasn’t even started production, not to talk of been released yet.

Y. Cassiopeia talk 05:29, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

/

9. A political candidates, without any previous or current political position, who is running for November 2021 election for a Senator position in United States with multiple local newspapers coverage of his candidacy.

Answer: 1. Fails WP:NPOL 2. The political candidate do not have both previous and current political position, neither has he won an election (waiting to be called to office).

Y. Cassiopeia talk 05:29, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

10. A singer who self produced his first album in May 2020 and his songs are listed in Spotify.

Answer:1. Fails WP:COMPOSER 2. No record of award or performance in a reputable music concert

Y. Cassiopeia talk 05:29, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

C. Based on which SSN guidelines the below subjects are notable under (1) which notability criteriaMUSICBI#1 (if certain sub set of criteria is applicable) and (2) reasons/explanations

11. Carlos Alós-Ferrer

Answer:1. Notable under WP:NACADEMIC.

Criteria (3) and (5)

3. The person has been an elected member of a highly selective and prestigious scholarly society or association (e.g., a National Academy of Sciences or the Royal Society) or a fellow of a major scholarly society which reserves fellow status as a highly selective honor (e.g., Fellow of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers).

In this case, the subject is currently the editor in chief of the Journal of Economic Psychology, this is a highly prestigious scholarly association.

5. The person has held a named chairappointment or distinguished professorappointment at a major institution of higher education and research, or an equivalent position in countries where named chairs are uncommon.

The subject is a distinguish professor at a notable and distinguished higher institute of learning.

Y. There is not mentioned nor citation in the article indicates subject is a fellow of certain institution and o mentioned of distinguished professor in the article. However the subject meets WP:NPROF #1 - see [1] for being highly cited and #8 as the chief editor of Journal of Economic Psychology [2]. Cassiopeia talk 01:58, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

12. Alistair Overeem

Answer: 1. Notable under WP:NKICK

Criteria: ‘Have been ranked in the world top-10 by a major, preferably two, independent publication that meets the definition of a reliable source’

Subject has won several heavyweight title reputable publications has ranked him as a top kickboxer

{[yellow tick}}. Subject also pass WP:NMMA for having been ranked in world top 10 in either Sherdog or Fight Maxtric - see https://www.fightmatrix.com/fighter-profile/Alistair+Overeem/454/. Note: some subject do pass a few SSN or NSG. Cassiopeia talk 01:58, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

13. Jennifer Lopez

Answer: 1. Notable under WP:COMPOSER

Criteria: ‘Has written a composition that has won (or in some cases been given a second or other place) in a major music competition not established expressly for newcomers.’

The Subject has written songs that has top the billboard

N. I am not sure the subject has entered competitions and won. However, The subject is notable (1) under SINGER#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #8, #11, #12 and NACTOR#1, #2, #3 (2) because she demonstrably meets the majority of SNG for singers and actors. Cassiopeia talk 01:58, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

14. Three Mile Island accident

Answer: 1. Notable under WP:EVENTCRITERIA

Criteria: ‘Events are also very likely to be notableif they have widespread (national or international) impact and were very widely covered in diverse sources, especially if also re-analyzed afterwards (as described below).’

The Three Mile Island accident had a widespread impact and was widely covered in numerous sources.

Y. The subject is notable under (1) EVENTCRIT#1 and 2 for having a lasting effect on the history of nuclear power in the United States and also was being covered y a variety of media for a sustained period of time. Cassiopeia talk 01:58, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

15. Persepolis

Answer: 1. Notable under WP:GEOFEAT. Criteria: Artificial geographical features that are officially assigned the status of cultural heritage or national heritage, or of any other protected status on a national level and for which verifiable information beyond simple statistics is available, are presumed to be notable.

Persepolis has been described by UNESCO as a word heritage site

Y. Cassiopeia talk 01:58, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

---

B.Korlah, Good day. See assignment 1 above.

(1) For all the assignments, pls provide hist diffs (see Help:Diff for instructions) of the articles, reverts, edits, reports, results of the reports, talk page messages that are applicable.

(2) Pls provide guidelines where applicable and justify/explain in details of your application or analysis.

(3) Pls ping me if you need assistance (here in this program page at the communication section of every assignment).

(4) Please book mark this page and ping me when you have finished the assignment for me to review.

(5) If you need to take a break from editing Wikipedia for more than 2 weeks, pls inform me so I may know. If you Stay safe and best. Welcome to NPPS.

Cassiopeia talk 02:58, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

HI -Cassiopeia, thank you so much for this lesson as it was a very insightful one, I’ve now completed my assignment for your review, also kindly confirm that I followed the Diff instruction provided by you (as I am not so sure if I did that correctly). I anticipate your response towards all of my work and I am willing to keep learning, unlearning and relearning. Thank you so much.

B.Korlah (talk) 05:49, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

B.Korlah, I suggest you to read all the links/ guidelines and not copy the answers from other participants for you submitted the answers with such a fast pace that that is almost hard to believe you do read the guidelines. The program is for participant to learn about NPP and not about getting the answer rights. It is disappointing. Cassiopeia talk 09:09, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

Hi Cassiopeia, that is not true. I have nothing to gain copying and who would I copy from?. I have been volunteering for Article for Creation (AFC) and before volunteering for AFC, I have been reading about the notability guidelines for a while which means I am quite familiar with it and I was on this assignment for over 2hours, immediately you sent, I had to recap on what I have learnt and learnt the new guidelines that I have not seen before. It’s sad to me that you accused me of copying or plagiarizing anyones work, you could use any plagiarism tester to test that I didn’t do anything of such.

B.Korlah (talk) 09:14, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

B.Korlah, ok. I had students which did copy other participants work and ended up abandon the program because they can answer nor understand the guidelines on the later assignments. I will review in next two days. Stay safe. Cassiopeia talk 10:11, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

Cassiopeia, thank you. I understand your point, I’m not like that, I’m a very diligent student. Thank you very much. Stay safe B.Korlah (talk) 10:16, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

B.Korlah, See comment above and pls answer again for Part C (which criteria). Ping me when you have finished. Thank you. Cassiopeia talk 05:29, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Dear Cassiopeia, Thank you for your review of my work. However, I really do not understand what you mean by ‘what criteria’ I thought what I wrote was the criteria, but it appears it’s not, could you please further explain what exactly you mean by criteria so I can further understand it to assist me complete my assignment. Thank you. B.Korlah (talk) 05:46, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

B.Korlah, Again, pls read Part C and read the SNG guidelines and provide the specific criteria listed. Example under WP:ARCHITECT there are 4 criteria, state the one which apply. Cassiopeia talk 06:57, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Dear Cassiopeia, thank you so much once again. I’ve gone through it more critical in the last one and half hour and I’ve now been able to fully understand what you are trying to say and I have updated the new changes for your review. Thank you so much for your time. B.Korlah (talk) 10:05, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Dear Cassiopeia, Been a while, I hope all is well??

B.Korlah (talk) 20:46, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

B.Korlah, Sorry for the delay. Pls read comments. Let me know if you have any questions or you are ready to move on to next assignment. Cassiopeia talk 01:58, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

Dear Cassiopeia, All read and well understood. I am ready to move on to the next assignment.B.Korlah (talk) 04:00, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

---

Sources

Background for trainees

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia for such content claimed should be supported by independent (secondary), reliable sources for verification. Please read WP:RS, WP:IS, WP:RSP, WP:V, WP:PROVEIT, WP:Primary, WP:Secondary, and WP:Tertiary and answered the the below questions in your own words.

You could contact WP:RX if you could not find the sources yourself either on web due to Paywall content or printed books.

---

Exercises

1.

Topic	Explanation	5 Examples	Comment by Cass
Reliable source		(example)The Guardian newspaper
User generated sources
Non Independent source

---

2.

Type	Explanation	Sources (15 Primary ; 5 Secondary ; 5 Tertiary)	Comment by Cass
Primary		(example) scientific journal articles reporting experimental research results
Secondary		(example) newspaper
Tertiary		(example) encyclopedias

---

3.

Subject	Primary	Secondary	Tertiary	Comment by Cass
Example: Art	Example:Sculpture	Example:Article critiquing the sculpture	Example:Encyclopedic article on the sculptor
History
Science
Athletes

---

4. Please explain in your own words why the content claimed needs to be verified?

Answer:

5.Could we used Wikipedia as the source? and why?

Answer:

6.Give an example and explain why a source is reliable but not independent of a subject?

Answer:

7.Give an example and explain why a source is independent source but not reliable?

Answer:

---

Pls indicate "y" for yes or "n" for no or "?" after "ind", "rel" and "sig" (see first example) and give a brief explanation of why you place "y" or "n".

Example Article about Bill Gates

Source assessment table:
Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
https://www.linkedin.com/in/williamhgates/	Linkedin is considered not independent as the info is provided by the subject.	Since the content is self-published, thus it is considered not a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy source	The source provide significant info about the subject	✘ No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

8.

David Petraeus

David Howell Petraeus AO (/pɪˈtreɪ.əs/; born November 7, 1952) is a retired United States Army general and public official. He served as Director of the Central Intelligence Agency from September 6, 2011, until his resignation on November 9, 2012 after his affair with Paula Broadwell was reported.

Petraeus was born in Cornwall-on-Hudson, New York, the son of Sixtus Petraeus (1915–2008), a sea captain from Franeker, Netherlands.

In 2003, Petraeus commanded the 101st Airborne Division in the fall of Baghdad

References

9. Please answer if the subject meets the "subject specific notability" guidelines, Which subject specific notability based on the given content above, and specify under (1) which notability criteria they meet or fail (example - MUSICBI#1 if certain sub set of criteria is applicable) and (2) reasons/explanations.

Answer:

---

10.

Martina Hingis is a Swiss former professional tennis player. She won five Grand Slam singles titles. Hingis was one of the highest-paid female athletes in 2000. She retired in November 2007 after being hampered by a hip injury for several months and testing positive for a metabolite of cocaine during that year's Wimbledon Championships, which led to a two-year suspension from the sport.

Source assessment table:
Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
https://www.instagram.com/martinahingis80/				? Unknown
https://www.latimes.com/sports/more/la-sp-us-open-hingis-20170910-story.html				? Unknown
				? Unknown
https://www.espn.com/tennis/story/_/id/21171438/tennis-another-twist-bizarre-career-martina-hingis				? Unknown
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2007/nov/01/tennis				? Unknown
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

References

11. Please answer if the subject meets the "subject specific notability" guidelines, Which subject specific notability based on the given content above, and specify under (1) which notability criteria they meet or fail (example - MUSICBI#1 if certain sub set of criteria is applicable) and (2) reasons/explanations.

Answer:

---

Pls indicate "y" for yes or "n" or "?" for no after "ind", "rel" and "sig" (see first example) and give a brief explanation of why you place "y" or "n".

12.

Fallingwater, Mill Run, Pennsylvania (1937)

Frank Lloyd Wright (June 8, 1867 – April 9, 1959) was an American architect, interior designer, writer, and educator. Wright believed in designing structures that were in harmony with humanity and its environment, a philosophy he called organic architecture. His creative period spanned more than 70 years. He works includes The Guggenheim, swirling, snail-shaped museum in the middle of Manhattan. Fallingwater, which has been called "the best all-time work of American architecture." This is one of Wright's most famous private residences (completed 1937), was built for Mr. and Mrs. Edgar J. Kaufmann, Sr., at Mill Run, Pennsylvania. Constructed over a 30-foot waterfall, it was designed according to Wright's desire to place the occupants close to the natural surroundings. The house was intended to be more of a family getaway, rather than a live-in home.

Source assessment table:
Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
https://nypost.com/2017/06/07/frank-lloyd-wright-was-a-house-builder-and-homewrecker/				? Unknown
https://franklloydwright.org/work/				? Unknown
https://web.archive.org/web/20080302053743/http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/jul2004/nf20040728_3153_db078.htm				? Unknown
https://books.google.com/books?id=KSA1HTTU-eMC				? Unknown
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

References

13. Please answer if the subject meets the "subject specific notability" guidelines, Which subject specific notability based on the given content above, and specify under (1) which notability criteria they meet or fail (example - MUSICBI#1 if certain sub set of criteria is applicable) and (2) reasons/explanations.

Answer:

---

14.

Jordan Lennon (born February 22, 2000), is a British film producer and actor. Lennon is currently a member of BAFTA. He continues to work aside 20th Century Fox, Warner Bros, Wicked Wales, Capture Studios, Cineworld, Paramount Pictures, and Rockefeller Foundation.

At age 16, the Vice President of 20th Century Fox, Paul Higginson. Who previously worked on Star Wars, Titanic, and Independence Day took on Jordan and Rowan Snow as a mentor. In December 2018, Jordan and Rowan finished British Film Academy. Jordan lived in Skelmersdale for 10 years before moving to Rhyl, North Wales. He's currently writing 'Stranger in the Night' scrreenplay for Warner Brothers.

Source assessment table:
Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
https://www.imdb.com/name/nm8902348/				? Unknown
http://www.bafta.org/wales				? Unknown
https://www.linkedin.com/in/jordan-d-98111a125				? Unknown
https://www.behindthevoiceactors.com/Jordan-David/				? Unknown
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

References

15. Please answer if the subject meets the "subject specific notability" guidelines, Which subject specific notability based on the given content above, and specify under (1) which notability criteria they meet or fail (example - MUSICBI#1 if certain sub set of criteria is applicable) and (2) reasons/explanations.

Answer:

---

16.

Sonny Bill Williams 2010

Sonny William Williams (born 3 August 1985), who is a Muslim, is a New Zealand All blacks rugby union footballer, Williams was a Marist Saints junior when he was spotted playing in Auckland by Bulldogs talent scout John Ackland. In 2002 he was offered a contract and moved to Sydney (as the youngest player to ever sign with an NRL club) to play in the Bulldogs' junior grades.

Source assessment table:
Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-7505117/2019-Rugby-World-Cup-Sonny-Bill-Williams-expecting-fourth-child.html				? Unknown
http://stats.allblacks.com/asp/Profile.asp?ABID=1108				? Unknown
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/warriors-league-team/news/article.cfm?c_id=360&objectid=10399308				? Unknown
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/10/01/1096527943523.html				? Unknown
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

References

17. Please answer if the subject meets the "subject specific notability" guidelines, Which subject specific notability based on the given content above, and specify under (1) which notability criteria they meet or fail (example - MUSICBI#1 if certain sub set of criteria is applicable) and (2) reasons/explanations.

Answer:

---

18.

Bryan Adams Guadalajara 2006

"Can't Stop This Thing We Started" is a song by Canadian singer and songwriter Bryan Adams. The song was written by Adams and Robert John "Mutt" Lange, and was the second single from Adams' 1991 album Waking Up the Neighbours where by the song was nominated for Grammy Award 1992 "Song of the Year"

Weekly charts

Chart (1991-1992)	Peak position
US Mainstream Rock (Billboard)	2
Denmark (IFPI)	2
US Billboard Hot 100	2

End-of-year charts

End-of-year chart (1991)	Position
Canada Top Singles (RPM)	3

References

19. Please answer if the subject meets the "subject specific notability" guidelines, Which subject specific notability based on the given content above, and specify under (1) which notability criteria they meet or fail (example - MUSICBI#1 if certain sub set of criteria is applicable) and (2) reasons/explanations.

Answer:

---

20.

Kamlesh Bhatt is a Solution Architect and a DevOps Engineer living in Singapore. I am a fan of technology, music, and entrepreneurship. He is interested in photography and travel. He could be reached at his blog and youtube channel.

Source assessment table:
Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
https://medium.com/@kamleshbhatt_				? Unknown
https://www.linkedin.com/in/kamlesh-bhatt-45392961/				? Unknown
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

References

21. Please answer if the subject meets the "subject specific notability" guidelines, Which subject specific notability based on the given content above, and specify under (1) which notability criteria they meet or fail (example - MUSICBI#1 if certain sub set of criteria is applicable) and (2) reasons/explanations.

Answer:

---

B.Korlah see assignment 2 above. Cassiopeia talk 01:13, 17 September 2022 (UTC)