User:Cassiopeia/NPPS/Heavy Grasshopper

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello, welcome to your New Page Patrol School page! Every person I instruct will have their own page on which I will give them support and tasks for them to complete. Please make sure you have this page added to your watchlist. Your NPP School page has been specifically designed according to you and what you have requested instruction in - for that reason, please be as specific as possible when under my instruction, so that I know the best ways to help you (and do not be afraid to let me know if you think something isn't working).

Make sure you read through Wikipedia:Notability as that's the knowledge which most of the questions I ask you and tasks you do will revolve around.

How to use this page

This page will be built up over your time in the Academy, with new sections being added as you complete old ones. Each section will end with a task, written in bold type - this might just ask a question, or it might require you to go and do something. You can answer a question by typing the answer below the task; if you have to do something, you will need to provide diffs to demonstrate that you have completed the task. Some sections will have more than one task, sometimes additional tasks may be added to a section as you complete them. Please always sign your responses to tasks as you would on a talk page.

If both the instructor and student make completing the course curriculum a top priority, it will generally take around a month to go through the entirety of the curriculum. This pace is not required or necessarily expected, but rather is provided in order to give participants an idea of what to expect.

Notability[edit]

PART 1

When patrolling or reviewing an article, you may often come across articles do not meet the WP:N guidelines, but the editors make the edits in good faith. Please read WP:AGF and do not WP:BITE the new editors.

A. Notability is a test guidelines to decide whether a given topic warrants its own article in Wikipedia mainspace. Please read Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not, General Notability Guidelines, Specific Notability Guidelines, Stand-alone list before completing the following tasks.


General notability guidelines[edit]

1. In your own words, why it is important to WP:AGF and not WP:BITE new editors.

Answer: It is important to assume good faith because this is a collaborative project in which we work together. Most editors do edit in good faith. Any editor can make a mistake, and bad faith can be assumed incorrectly. Biting new editors will make them think that Wikipedia is not a place for them. They will feel unwelcome. It will stop potentially good editors from learning. Ultimately, they may leave.

{[tick}}. Cassiopeia talk 02:25, 12 September 2022 (UTC)


2. In your own words, how is notability defined in Wikipedia?

Answer: Notability is a concept used to determine whether a subject deserves its own article, or not. In order to be worthy of an article, the subject has to meet either the general notability guideline (GNG) or a subject-specific notability guideline (SNG). However, some things are ruled out because of WP:What Wikipedia is not.

checkY. In Wikipedia, notability means "worthy to be noted" - it is defined as a topic is "presumably" notable for stand-alone article or list if (1) it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject whee by the sources talk "directly" about the subject in depth and in length and not only passing mentioned and (2) it is not excluded under the What WP:Wikipedia is not policy. Cassiopeia talk 02:25, 12 September 2022 (UTC)


3. Does a step by step instructions on how to "Change a car tire" considered a notable topic in Wikipedia?

Answer: No, because Wikipedia is not a guide.

{[tick}}. Cassiopeia talk 02:25, 12 September 2022 (UTC)


4. What are the differences between A WP:GNG and a specific notability guidelines? how do we determine which one to use when patrolling an article?

Answer: The GNG states that a topic can be presumed to be notable if it has received significant, independent coverage in reliable sources. SNGs are focused on notability within specific subjects and vary quite a lot. Most issue guidance on when a subject is likely to have significant coverage and be worthy of an article. For example, WP:NSPORTS contains guidelines for sports, including Sumo. It states that "Significant coverage is likely to exist for sumo wrestlers if they have been ranked in either the top (makuuchi) division or second-highest (juryo) division". However, it is still necessary for editors to exercise good judgement when following guidelines. Some of the SNGs also give guidance on circumstances in which articles should not be made.

checkY. Both GNG and SNG can be used when reviewing an article; however SNG does not supersited GNG. Example: certain subjects would not meet GNG due to the fact that no article talk about them directly in length and in dept such the academics- WP:PROF - who would received few or none independence source talk about them (we would see BBC write an article about car stuck in a tree see here but not the President of Australian National University would be hard to find) Other SGN such as WP:NPOL specify a very strict set of source criteria and requirements . Note: those subject falls under SNG/SSG (sport specific guidelines) but fails to meet the WP:GNG guidelines would sometimes nominated for deletion WP:AfD for discussion to determine the status of the article. (We will cover AfD in later assignment). Cassiopeia talk 02:25, 12 September 2022 (UTC)


Specific notability guidelines[edit]

5. If an editor creates an article about "2024 Summer Olympics" in 2019 without providing any sources, is the subject considered not notable and why?

Answer: Articles that are created without sources can still be notable, but sources should be added as soon as possible. Per WP:FUTUREEVENT, events that are notable and almost certain to happen can be worthy of articles. In this case, this is a very major and significant event which is almost certain to happen. So if the article is created in 2019 unsourced it is nevertheless notable and likely worthy of an article.

checkY. The subject is considered notable as 1. it had widespread effect as an international event, 2. The host nation of Olympics games would usually be announced 8 years prior the event, so even the article might not have source, we, as the reviewers, would find the sources and add them in as good practice and make the article notable. Cassiopeia talk 02:25, 12 September 2022 (UTC)


B. Without considered of sources/content policies and review just based on "subject specific notability" (SSN) "alone" for sake of the exercises below, please answer if the subject meets the SSN guidelines, based on the given content below, and specify under (1) which notability criteria they meet or fail (example - MUSICBI#1 if certain sub set of criteria is applicable) and (2) reasons/explanations.


6. A New York city based 2021 start up software company , specializing in data mining, has just received a USD 200K investor fund.

Answer: 1) Fails WP:COMPANY

2) Nothing about this is inherently notable, and none of the SSN guidelines are fulfilled by the given information.

checkY. Cassiopeia talk 02:25, 12 September 2022 (UTC)


7. Guram Kutateladze who is a Ultimate Fighting Championships fighters with the undefeated mixed martial arts record of 12-2.


Answer:

1) Fails WP:NMMA

2) Per WP:NMMA the fighter would be likely to have significant coverage if ranked in the top ten of a weight division by Sherdog or Fight Matrix. However, his best ranking is 20.

checkY. Cassiopeia talk 02:25, 12 September 2022 (UTC)



8. A upcoming action drama title "Suleiman the Great" based on the the life of Suleiman the Magnificent, was reported will be in production in December 2022 and to be released on August 2023 in the cinemas.

Answer:

1) Fails WP:NFILM

2) The policy to follow for upcoming films is WP:NFF. In this case, per the policy, if principle photography has not begun, the article should not be created.

checkY. Cassiopeia talk 02:25, 12 September 2022 (UTC)


9. A political candidates, without any previous or current political position, who is running for November 2021 election for a Senator position in United States with multiple local newspapers coverage of his candidacy.

Answer:

1) Fails WP:NPOL

2)Per WP:NPOL this candidate is not notable until elected based on the SSN alone.

checkY. Cassiopeia talk 02:25, 12 September 2022 (UTC)



10. A singer who self produced his first album in May 2020 and his songs are listed in Spotify.

Answer:

1) Fails WP:MUSICBIO

2) Per WP:MUSICBIO this information is not enough to fulfill any of the criteria.

checkY. Cassiopeia talk 02:25, 12 September 2022 (UTC)



C. Based on which SSN guidelines the below subjects are notable under (1) which notability criteriaMUSICBI#1 (if certain sub set of criteria is applicable) and (2) reasons/explanations

11. Carlos Alós-Ferrer

Answer:

1) notable per NACADEMIC#8.

2) Chief editor of a well established journal (Journal of Economic Psychology).

checkY. The subject also meets WP:NPROF #1 - see [1] for being highly cited and #8 as the chief editor of Journal of Economic Psychology [2]. Cassiopeia talk 02:25, 12 September 2022 (UTC)


12. Alistair Overeem

Answer:

1) notable per WP:NMMA

2)Once ranked as #2 in heavyweight division by Fight Matrix.

checkY Subject also meet WP:NKICK for having been ranked in the world top-10 - see here. Cassiopeia talk 02:25, 12 September 2022 (UTC)


13. Three Mile Island accident

Answer:

1) notable per WP:EVENTCRIT. Had WP:LASTING impact, WP:INDEPTH coverage.

2) The event was reported worldwide, had a serious impact on the perception of nuclear power and development of new reactors.

checkY. Cassiopeia talk 02:25, 12 September 2022 (UTC)


14. Persepolis

Answer:

1) Notable per WP:GEOLAND

2) Historically populated place.

checkY. Cassiopeia talk 02:25, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
JohnmgKing, Good day. See assignment 1 above.
(1) For all the assignments, pls provide hist diffs (see Help:Diff for instructions) of the articles, reverts, edits, reports, results of the reports, talk page messages that are applicable.
(2) Pls provide guidelines where applicable and justify/explain in details of your application or analysis.
(3) Pls ping me if you need assistance (here in this program page at the communication section of every assignment).
(4) Please book mark this page and ping me when you have finished the assignment for me to review.
(5) If you need to take a break from editing Wikipedia for more than 2 weeks, pls inform me so I may know. If you Stay safe and best. Welcome to NPPS.
Cassiopeia talk 09:57, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
JohnmgKing you need to answer if the subject is notable or not under section B. Cassiopeia talk 09:43, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
Cassiopeia Thanks, I think that's everything I can think of .JohnmgKing (talk) 10:29, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
Cassiopeia Hi Cassiopeia, will you get a chance to review this first assignment soon? JohnmgKing (talk) 12:44, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
JohnmgKing See comments and let me know if you have any questions or you are ready to move on to the next assignmment. Cassiopeia talk 02:25, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
Thanks Cassiopeia, I have read the comments and I am ready to move on to the next assignment. JohnmgKing (talk) 08:37, 12 September 2022 (UTC)


Sources[edit]

Background for trainees[edit]

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia for such content claimed should be supported by independent (secondary), reliable sources for verification. Please read WP:RS, WP:IS, WP:RSP, WP:V, WP:PROVEIT, WP:Primary, WP:Secondary, and WP:Tertiary and answered the the below questions in your own words.
You could contact WP:RX if you could not find the sources yourself either on web due to Paywall content or printed books.


Exercises[edit]

1.
Topic Explanation 5 Examples Comment by Cass
Reliable source Independent, accurate, verifiable sources. Preferably should consider different points of view on their topic (major ones at least).
  1. (example)The Guardian newspaper
  2. BBC News
  3. Chicago Tribune
  4. The Times
  5. Financial Times
  6. New England Journal of Medicine
 checkY. Cassiopeia talk 00:11, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
User generated sources In general, content from internet sites or other sources which contain content generated by users is not acceptable because it is not reliable, has not undergone verification, and could be changed arbitrarily.
  1. Discogs
  2. Goodreads
  3. IMDb
  4. Quora
  5. Facebook
 checkY. Cassiopeia talk 00:11, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Non Independent source A source which is not independent from the subject of the article.
  1. Company website
  2. Press release (by an individual or organisation, about themselves)
  3. Advertising and other types of marketing
  4. Self-published articles and books
  5. Sources written by close family members
 checkY. Cassiopeia talk 00:11, 17 September 2022 (UTC)



2.
Type Explanation Sources (15 Primary ; 5 Secondary ; 5 Tertiary) Comment by Cass
Primary A first hand piece of evidence of original material, often directly connected to the subject.
  1. (example) scientific journal articles reporting experimental research results
  2. Manuscripts
  3. Minutes
  4. Memoirs
  5. Surveys (opinion polls etc)
  6. Contemporary publications by directly connected author
  7. Census
  8. Photographs
  9. Video of event
  10. Diary of Samuel Pepys
  11. Artwork
  12. Interviews
  13. Novels
  14. Hansard (UK)
  15. Letters, emails etc
  16. Historic maps
  17. Reports
 checkY. Cassiopeia talk 00:11, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Secondary Sources using primary sources to analyse, evaluate, interpret, etc, an event or subject. Usually creator of secondary sources would not be a first-hand witness or be directly involved in the event/subject.
  1. (example) newspaper
  2. Literature reviews
  3. Biography (not autobiography)
  4. Statistical analysis
  5. Journal articles which comment on previous research
  6. Film reviews
 checkY. Cassiopeia talk 00:11, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Tertiary Often pulls information from secondary sources and condenses or re-formats the information. Sometimes in a summary style like Wikipedia articles but could also be diagrams, etc.
  1. (example) encyclopedias
  2. Diagrams like historical timelines
  3. Lists
  4. Catalogues
  5. Almanacs
  6. Academic textbooks
 checkY. Cassiopeia talk 00:11, 17 September 2022 (UTC)



3.


Subject Primary Secondary Tertiary Comment by Cass
Example: Art Example:Sculpture Example:Article critiquing the sculpture Example:Encyclopedic article on the sculptor
History Commentarii de Bello Gallico The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire A modern textbook on Roman history checkY. Cassiopeia talk 00:11, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Science An initial report showing results of scientific experiments A review of the study in a scientific journal A textbook featuring these findings and commenting on the secondary sources checkY. Cassiopeia talk 00:11, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Athletes A video of David Beckham scoring a goal A biography of David Beckham The Wikipedia article about David Beckham checkY. Cassiopeia talk 00:11, 17 September 2022 (UTC)



4. Please explain in your own words why the content claimed needs to be verified?

Answer: So that everyone using Wikipedia knows they are reading reliable, factually correct content, and they can verify and check sources themselves if desired. This also allows editors reviewing articles to ensure that new articles being created are about real things.

checkY. Cassiopeia talk 00:11, 17 September 2022 (UTC)


5.Could we used Wikipedia as the source? and why?

Answer: No, because this would be WP:CIRCULAR

checkY. Cassiopeia talk 00:11, 17 September 2022 (UTC)


6.Give an example and explain why a source is reliable but not independent of a subject?

Answer: The source is an article written in a reputable medical journal, but was written by the subject of the article.

checkY. Cassiopeia talk 00:11, 17 September 2022 (UTC)


7.Give an example and explain why a source is independent source but not reliable?

Answer: A book that is by an independent scholar, but was never published.

checkY. Cassiopeia talk 00:11, 17 September 2022 (UTC)


Pls indicate "y" for yes or "n" for no or "?" after "ind", "rel" and "sig" (see first example) and give a brief explanation of why you place "y" or "n".

Example Article about Bill Gates

Source assessment table:
Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG?
https://www.linkedin.com/in/williamhgates/ No Linkedin is considered not independent as the info is provided by the subject. No Since the content is self-published, thus it is considered not a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy source Yes The source provide significant info about the subject ✘ No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.


8.
David Petraeus

David Howell Petraeus AO (/pɪˈtreɪ.əs/; born November 7, 1952) is a retired United States Army general and public official. He served as Director of the Central Intelligence Agency from September 6, 2011,[1] until his resignation on November 9, 2012[2] after his affair with Paula Broadwell was reported.[3]

Petraeus was born in Cornwall-on-Hudson, New York, the son of Sixtus Petraeus (1915–2008),[4] a sea captain from Franeker, Netherlands.[5]


In 2003, Petraeus commanded the 101st Airborne Division in the fall of Baghdad[6][7]


Source assessment table:
Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG?
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2012/11/09/david-petraeus-cia-resign-nbc/1695271/ Yes USA Today is a newspaper source independent from the subject Yes USA Today has an editorial process and is generally considered reliable. Yes This source provides significant coverage of the subject. ✔ Yes
http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/us/2011/09/06/petraeus-sworn-into-cia.cnn?iref=allsearch Yes CNN is indepedent of the subject. Yes CNN is generally considered to be reliable. Yes As a primary source showing what occurred in this ceremony, significant coverage is provided. ✔ Yes
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/david-petraeus-paula-broadwell_n_2118893 Yes Associated Press journalists seem to have written the article Yes AP writers generally reliable Yes Provides significant coverage of subject's personal life ✔ Yes
https://www.geni.com/people/Sixtus-Petraeus/6000000015418360012 Yes Independent of subject No This site is an open wiki and cannot be relied upon. No Not significant coverage ✘ No
http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2010/05/petraeus-exclusive-201005 Yes Independent of the subject Yes Vanity Fair is considered a reliable source. Yes Provides significant coverage of the subject. ✔ Yes
https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/beyond/interviews/petraeus.html No Not independent as the main source of information is the subject's own words in the interview Yes PBS is a reliable source Yes Provides significant coverage of the subject ✘ No
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/profiles/david-petraeus-general-surge-401740.html Yes Independent by name and nature. Yes Considered a reliable newspaper source. Yes This is a profile of the subject and provides signifcant coverage. ✔ Yes
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

References

  1. ^ "Petraeus sworn in as CIA director". CNN. Retrieved October 11, 2019.
  2. ^ Johnson, Kevin (November 9, 2012). "David Petraeus resigns from CIA". USA Today. Retrieved November 9, 2012.
  3. ^ "Petraeus Shocked By Girlfriend's Emails". HuffPost. 2012-11-12. Retrieved 2019-10-11.
  4. ^ "Sixtus Petraeus". geni.com.
  5. ^ "David Petraeus' Winning Streak". Vanity Fair. March 30, 2010. Retrieved October 11, 2019.
  6. ^ "beyond baghdad". www.pbs.org. 2004-02-12. Retrieved 2019-10-11.
  7. ^ "David Petraeus: General Surge". The Independent. 2007-09-08. Retrieved 2019-10-11.
All sources answers are correct. Provided the accessible huffpost.com URL, kindly answer the source question.
checkY. Huffpost - Although HuffPost contributors is considered not reliable in WP:RSP but if we look closely, the piece is written by By ANNE FLAHERTY, KIMBERLY DOZIER AND ADAM GOLDMAN, THE ASSOCIATED PRESS. The Associated press is considered reliable source as they sell their news to other news agencies. However, the content is based on many individual opinions, for such I would talk it as not reliable sources. Cassiopeia talk 02:47, 19 September 2022 (UTC)


9. Please answer if the subject meets the "subject specific notability" guidelines, Which subject specific notability based on the given content above, and specify under (1) which notability criteria they meet or fail (example - MUSICBI#1 if certain sub set of criteria is applicable) and (2) reasons/explanations.

Answer: After searching for a while, I can't find a SSN that is relevant for this person. I am sure that being the CIA Director and US Army General is grounds for notability, but I cannot find a subject-specific guideline.

checkY. Cassiopeia talk 00:53, 17 September 2022 (UTC)



10.

Martina Hingis is a Swiss former professional tennis player.[1] She won five Grand Slam singles titles.[2] Hingis was one of the highest-paid female athletes in 2000.[3] She retired in November 2007 after being hampered by a hip injury for several months and testing positive for a metabolite of cocaine during that year's Wimbledon Championships,[4] which led to a two-year suspension from the sport.[5]

Source assessment table:
Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG?
https://www.instagram.com/martinahingis80/ No This is her own Instagram profile and is not independent. No Not reliable as this is content generated by the user. Yes Primarily her profile is about her and does provide significant coverage. ✘ No
https://www.latimes.com/sports/more/la-sp-us-open-hingis-20170910-story.html Yes Independent newspaper source Reliable publication Provides significant coverage. ? Unknown
[3] Yes Book by independent author Yes Looks reasonably cited and written Yes Features the subject heavily. ✔ Yes
https://www.espn.com/tennis/story/_/id/21171438/tennis-another-twist-bizarre-career-martina-hingis Yes Independent news source Yes Reliable publication Yes Is about the subject ✔ Yes
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2007/nov/01/tennis Yes Independent news source Yes Reliable publication Yes Is about the subject ✔ Yes
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

References

  1. ^ "Martina Hingis (@martinahingis80) • Instagram photos and videos". www.instagram.com. Retrieved 2019-10-11.
  2. ^ "Martina Hingis wins her 25th Grand Slam championship, the women's doubles crown at the U.S. Open". Los Angeles Times. 2017-09-11. Retrieved 2019-10-11.
  3. ^ a b Paul Fein (30 January 2003). Tennis Confidential: Today's Greatest Players, Matches, and Controversies. Potomac Books, Inc. pp. 197–. ISBN 978-1-57488-526-2.
  4. ^ "Done again? Why Martina Hingis decided to retire for a third time". ESPN.com. 2017-10-26. Retrieved 2019-10-11.
  5. ^ Staff; agencies (2007-11-01). "Tennis: Martina Hingis retires amid cocaine controversy". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 2019-10-11.
checkY.00:53, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
11. Please answer if the subject meets the "subject specific notability" guidelines, Which subject specific notability based on the given content above, and specify under (1) which notability criteria they meet or fail (example - MUSICBI#1 if certain sub set of criteria is applicable) and (2) reasons/explanations.

Answer: (1) WP:NTENNIS (2) Passes basically everything as a former Grand Slam champion etc.

checkY.00:53, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Pls indicate "y" for yes or "n" or "?" for no after "ind", "rel" and "sig" (see first example) and give a brief explanation of why you place "y" or "n".
12.
Fallingwater, Mill Run, Pennsylvania (1937)

Frank Lloyd Wright (June 8, 1867 – April 9, 1959) was an American architect, interior designer, writer, and educator. Wright believed in designing structures that were in harmony with humanity and its environment, a philosophy he called organic architecture. His creative period spanned more than 70 years. He works includes The Guggenheim, swirling, snail-shaped museum in the middle of Manhattan.[1][2] Fallingwater, which has been called "the best all-time work of American architecture."[3] This is one of Wright's most famous private residences (completed 1937), was built for Mr. and Mrs. Edgar J. Kaufmann, Sr., at Mill Run, Pennsylvania. Constructed over a 30-foot waterfall, it was designed according to Wright's desire to place the occupants close to the natural surroundings. The house was intended to be more of a family getaway, rather than a live-in home.[4]


Source assessment table:
Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG?
https://nypost.com/2017/06/07/frank-lloyd-wright-was-a-house-builder-and-homewrecker/ Yes Independent major newspaper Yes Reliable publication with editorial process. Yes Provides significant coverage of subject ✔ Yes
https://franklloydwright.org/work/ No Not independent of the subject, clearly connected. No As this is not independent it cannot be relied upon for objective statements about the subject. Yes Provides significant coverage ✘ No
https://web.archive.org/web/20080302053743/http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/jul2004/nf20040728_3153_db078.htm Yes Seems like an independent news source Yes Reliable news source Yes Discusses some of the subject's work in detail ✔ Yes
https://books.google.com/books?id=KSA1HTTU-eMC Yes Author and publisher independent of subject. Yes Seems to have good citations and so on. Yes Biography of the subject ✔ Yes
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

References

  1. ^ Hoffman, Barbara (2017-06-07). "Famed architect Frank Lloyd Wright had a dark side". New York Post. Retrieved 2019-10-04.
  2. ^ "Frank Lloyd Wright's Work". Frank Lloyd Wright Foundation. Retrieved 2019-10-04.
  3. ^ "BW Online | July 28, 2004 | Frank Lloyd Wright: America's Architect". 2008-03-02. Archived from the original on 2008-03-02. Retrieved 2019-10-04.
  4. ^ Robert C. Twombly (24 April 1987). Frank Lloyd Wright: His Life and His Architecture. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-0-471-85797-6.
Missed "https://web.archive.org/web/20080302053743/http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/jul2004/nf20040728_3153_db078.htm" answer (I could access). Pls answer. Cassiopeia talk 00:53, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
checkY. Cassiopeia talk 02:47, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
13. Please answer if the subject meets the "subject specific notability" guidelines, Which subject specific notability based on the given content above, and specify under (1) which notability criteria they meet or fail (example - MUSICBI#1 if certain sub set of criteria is applicable) and (2) reasons/explanations.

Answer: (1) WP:ARCHITECT - seems to meet at least 1, 2 and 4. Not sure about 3.

checkY. Full content from the article of Frank Lloyd Wright, he would pass all the all (1-4) WP:ARCHITECT criteria. Cassiopeia talk 00:53, 17 September 2022 (UTC)



14.

Jordan Lennon (born February 22, 2000), is a British film producer and actor. [1] Lennon is currently a member of BAFTA.[2] He continues to work aside 20th Century Fox, Warner Bros, Wicked Wales, Capture Studios, Cineworld, Paramount Pictures, and Rockefeller Foundation.[3]

At age 16, the Vice President of 20th Century Fox, Paul Higginson. Who previously worked on Star Wars, Titanic, and Independence Day took on Jordan and Rowan Snow as a mentor.[4] In December 2018, Jordan and Rowan finished British Film Academy.[5] Jordan lived in Skelmersdale for 10 years before moving to Rhyl, North Wales. He's currently writing 'Stranger in the Night' scrreenplay for Warner Brothers.


Source assessment table:
Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG?
https://www.imdb.com/name/nm8902348/ No IMDb can't be said to be independent, because the subject or connected user may have had input. No IMDb is not considered a reliable source No Link not working, but IMDb profiles are not going to provide SIGCOV. ✘ No
http://www.bafta.org/wales Yes Likely to be independent as this is a major awards thing. Yes Likely to be reliable. No The link just goes to the homepage so nothing connected to the subject can be found. ✘ No
https://www.linkedin.com/in/jordan-d-98111a125 No Content likely to be connected to the subject. No User-generated. ? Again the link isn't working, but LinkedIn profiles often could provide significant coverage. ✘ No
https://www.behindthevoiceactors.com/Jordan-David/ No Unknown if subject created the profile No User-generated, social kind of site. No Not significant coverage ✘ No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

References

  1. ^ "Jordan D. Lennon". IMDb. Retrieved 2019-01-21.
  2. ^ "BAFTA Cymru". www.bafta.org. 2014-06-16. Retrieved 2019-01-21.
  3. ^ Lennon, Jordan. "LinkedIn Account". LinkedIn. {{cite web}}: |archive-date= requires |archive-url= (help)
  4. ^ "Jordan David - 2 Character Images". Behind The Voice Actors. Retrieved 2019-10-04.
  5. ^ "BFI Film Academy". Tape Community Music & Film. 2016-08-24. Retrieved 2019-01-21.
checkY. Cassiopeia talk 00:53, 17 September 2022 (UTC)


15. Please answer if the subject meets the "subject specific notability" guidelines, Which subject specific notability based on the given content above, and specify under (1) which notability criteria they meet or fail (example - MUSICBI#1 if certain sub set of criteria is applicable) and (2) reasons/explanations.

Answer: Subject not notable. Does not pass any relevant notability criterea such as WP:NACTOR

checkY. Cassiopeia talk 00:53, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
16.
Sonny Bill Williams 2010

Sonny William Williams (born 3 August 1985), who is a Muslim[1], is a New Zealand All blacks rugby union footballer,[2] Williams was a Marist Saints junior when he was spotted playing in Auckland by Bulldogs talent scout John Ackland.[3] In 2002 he was offered a contract and moved to Sydney (as the youngest player to ever sign with an NRL club) to play in the Bulldogs' junior grades.[4]

Source assessment table:
Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG?
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-7505117/2019-Rugby-World-Cup-Sonny-Bill-Williams-expecting-fourth-child.html Yes Independent of source No Per WP:DAILYMAIL Yes Primarily about the subject ✘ No
http://stats.allblacks.com/asp/Profile.asp?ABID=1108 No As he played for this team, this is not an independent source. Yes Statistics etc likely to be reliable, as this is the national team of New Zealand. Yes A profile of the subject. ✘ No
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/warriors-league-team/news/article.cfm?c_id=360&objectid=10399308 Yes Independent newspaper No As an interview this is more of a primary source No Only briefly mentions the subject ✘ No
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/10/01/1096527943523.html Yes Independent newspaper Yes Though written in a non-encyclopedic way, this article can be relied upon for facts etc. Yes Heavily features and discusses the subject. ✔ Yes
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

References

  1. ^ "2019 Rugby World Cup: Sonny Bill Williams is expecting a fourth child". Mail Online. 2019-09-25. Retrieved 2019-10-04.
  2. ^ "Stats | allblacks.com". stats.allblacks.com. Retrieved 2019-10-04.
  3. ^ Rattue, Chris (2 September 2006). "Jerome Ropati – Miracle in the making". New Zealand Herald. APN Holdings. Retrieved 10 October 2010.
  4. ^ "The King, Sonny and heir". Sydney Morning Herald. Fairfax. 2 October 2004. Retrieved 12 November 2011.
checkY. Cassiopeia talk 00:53, 17 September 2022 (UTC)


17. Please answer if the subject meets the "subject specific notability" guidelines, Which subject specific notability based on the given content above, and specify under (1) which notability criteria they meet or fail (example - MUSICBI#1 if certain sub set of criteria is applicable) and (2) reasons/explanations.

Answer: (1) WP:NRUGBY (2) Passes all relevant criteria

checkY. Sonny Bill Williams (full content), the subject would also meet WP:NRU criteria 1, 2. Cassiopeia talk 00:53, 17 September 2022 (UTC)


18.


Bryan Adams Guadalajara 2006

"Can't Stop This Thing We Started" is a song by Canadian singer and songwriter Bryan Adams. The song was written by Adams and Robert John "Mutt" Lange, and was the second single from Adams' 1991 album Waking Up the Neighbours where by the song was nominated for Grammy Award 1992 "Song of the Year"[1]


Weekly charts

Chart (1991-1992) Peak
position
US Mainstream Rock (Billboard)[2] 2
Denmark (IFPI)[3] 2
US Billboard Hot 100[4] 2

End-of-year charts

End-of-year chart (1991) Position
Canada Top Singles (RPM)[5] 3


Source assessment table:
Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG?
https://www.nytimes.com/1992/01/09/arts/grammy-short-list-many-for-a-few.html Yes Indepedent news source Yes Reliable publication No Not significant coverage of the subject ✘ No
https://www.billboard.com/music/Bryan-Adams/chart-history/RTT ? Unknown
https://www.billboard.com/music/Bryan-Adams/chart-history/HSI ? Unknown
https://www.bac-lac.gc.ca/eng/discover/films-videos-sound-recordings/rpm/Pages/image.aspx?Image=nlc008388.2024&URLjpg=http%3a%2f%2fwww.collectionscanada.gc.ca%2fobj%2f028020%2ff4%2fnlc008388.2024.gif&Ecopy=nlc008388.2024 Yes Not likely connected to subject No Primary source No Not significant coverage ✘ No
https://www.musicvf.com/song.php?title=Can%27t+Stop+This+Thing+We+Started+by+Bryan+Adams&id=7272 Yes Does not appear connected with subject No A primary source in terms of linking to the music and so on. Yes Is about the song. ✘ No
https://musicchartsarchive.com/singles/bryan-adams/cant-stop-this-thing-we-started No Unknown as user generated content No Not reliable as user generated content Yes Is about the song and gives lyrics, can be treated like a primary source ✘ No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

References

  1. ^ Pareles, Jon (1992-01-09). "Grammy Short List: Many For a Few". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2019-12-28.
  2. ^ "Bryan Adams Chart History (Mainstream Rock)". Billboard.
  3. ^ "Top 10 Denmark" (PDF). Music & Media. Retrieved March 21, 2018.[permanent dead link]
  4. ^ "Bryan Adams Chart History (Hot 100)". Billboard.
  5. ^ "RPM 100 Hit Tracks of 1991". RPM. Retrieved November 23, 2017.
19. Please answer if the subject meets the "subject specific notability" guidelines, Which subject specific notability based on the given content above, and specify under (1) which notability criteria they meet or fail (example - MUSICBI#1 if certain sub set of criteria is applicable) and (2) reasons/explanations.

Answer: (1) Meets WP:NSONGS (2) Fulfils #1 and #2. Reached number two on the US Billboard Hot 100. Top of the Canadian RPM Top Singles chart for three weeks. Two Grammy nominations.

checkY. Cassiopeia talk 00:53, 17 September 2022 (UTC)



20.


Kamlesh Bhatt is a Solution Architect and a DevOps Engineer living in Singapore. I am a fan of technology, music, and entrepreneurship. He is interested in photography and travel. He could be reached at his blog and youtube channel.[1][2]


Source assessment table:
Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG?
https://medium.com/@kamleshbhatt_ No Though link not working, this would be user generated content, possibly created by the subject. No No editorial oversight, just user-generated content. Yes Would likely provide significant coverage ✘ No
https://www.linkedin.com/in/kamlesh-bhatt-45392961/ No Not independent of the subject No User generated content Yes Provides significant coverage ✘ No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

References

  1. ^ "Kamlesh Bhatt". Medium. Retrieved 2019-12-28.
  2. ^ Bhatt, Kamlesh (December 27, 2019). "Kamlesh Bhatt". Linkedin. Retrieved December 27, 2019.
checkY. Cassiopeia talk 00:53, 17 September 2022 (UTC)


21. Please answer if the subject meets the "subject specific notability" guidelines, Which subject specific notability based on the given content above, and specify under (1) which notability criteria they meet or fail (example - MUSICBI#1 if certain sub set of criteria is applicable) and (2) reasons/explanations.

Answer: The subject is not notable.

checkY. Cassiopeia talk 00:53, 17 September 2022 (UTC)


JohnmgKing See assignment 2 above. Cassiopeia talk 09:46, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
Hi Cassiopeia, I think I have completed this section now. I learned a bit from reading some of the guidelines. There were a few broken links in the assignment, I left a couple blank and guessed one or two based on the kind of source. JohnmgKing (talk) 11:01, 15 September 2022 (UTC)


JohnmgKing Hi, Pls see comments above. Pls answer the source questions for David Petraeus and Fallingwater (I have provide new URL and I could access the source of the "Fallngwater" question. Ping when you have finished. Cassiopeia talk 00:53, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Cassiopeia Hi I think I have done everything now, thanks!
JohnmgKing, Pls see comment on David Petraeus's HuffPost. Let me know if you have any questions or you are ready to move on to the next assignment. Cassiopeia talk 02:47, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
Thanks Cassiopeia, that one was difficult but I understand it now. I am ready to move on to the next assignment. JohnmgKing (talk) 08:13, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Content Policy[edit]

Article titles[edit]

Please read WP:TITLE and answer the questions below


1. Article name "Hannibal Barca" - Does the article name need to be change? and Why? (please explain based on Wikipedia guidelines and name/link the guidelines in your answer)

Hannibal Barca was a Carthaginian general and statesman who is widely considered one of the greatest military commanders in history. His father, Hamilcar Barca, was a leading Carthaginian commander during the First Punic War (264–241 BC).[1][2][3]

References

  1. ^ Eve MacDonald (24 February 2015). Hannibal: A Hellenistic Life. Yale University Press. pp. 48–. ISBN 978-0-300-21015-6.
  2. ^ John Whitaker; Hannibal (1794). The course of Hannibal over the Alps ascertained. John Stockdale, Piccadilly. pp. 1–.
  3. ^ Patrick N Hunt (11 July 2017). Hannibal. Simon & Schuster. pp. 214–. ISBN 978-1-4391-0977-9.

Answer: This article should be named Hannibal per WP:COMMONNAME. This is also per recognizability on WP:CRITERIA

checkY. Two points here - need to change the article name as per WP:COMMONNAME and a redirect. Cassiopeia talk 01:56, 29 September 2022 (UTC)


2. Article name "Magic Johnson". Does the article name need to be change? and Why?(please explain based on Wikipedia guidelines and name/link the guidelines in your answer)

Earvin "Magic" Johnson Jr. (born August 14, 1959) is an American retired professional basketball player and former president of basketball operations of the Los Angeles Lakers of the National Basketball Association (NBA). He played point guard for the Lakers for 13 seasons.[1][2][3][4]

References

  1. ^ Roselius, J. Chris. (2011). Magic Johnson : basketball star & entrepreneur. Edina, Minn.: ABDO Pub. Co. ISBN 9781617147562. OCLC 663953248.
  2. ^ "Magic Johnson | Biography & Facts". Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 2019-10-23.
  3. ^ Stein, Marc; Deb, Sopan (2019-04-11). "Magic Johnson Always Set His Sights Beyond Basketball". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2019-10-23.
  4. ^ "Magic Johnson: Michael Jordan said Stephen Curry not Hall of Famer in fear of tampering fine". sports.yahoo.com. Retrieved 2019-10-23.


Answer: This is the correct title per WP:COMMONNAME and WP:CRITERIA. Johnson is referred to as 'Magic' in sources.

checkY. Cassiopeia talk 01:56, 29 September 2022 (UTC)


Biographies of living persons[edit]

Please read WP:BLP and answer the questions below.
3. As per the texts below, pls explain the if the content is acceptable of inclusive and why. (please explain based on Wikipedia guidelines and name/link the guidelines in your answer)

Conor Anthony McGregor (born 14 July 1988) is an Irish professional mixed martial artist and boxer. His is a former Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) featherweight and lightweight champion.[1]

On 15 August 2019, TMZ Sports published a video that appeared to show McGregor punching a man at The Marble Arch Pub in Dublin.[2] The incident happened on 6 April and was originally reported by Irish media, although without the video that showed the attack. Irish police stated in April that they had opened an investigation.[3] McGregor was charged with assault and first appeared in court on 11 October 2019.[4][5][6]

In April 2019, McGregor is the father of Terri Murray's son, Clodagh. Murray bedded McGregor in 2017 at his hotel after the Aintree Grand National just four weeks bofore McGregor's girlfriend Dee Devlin gave birth to their son.

References

  1. ^ "The most surprising stories behind Conor McGregor's incredible success". IrishCentral. 13 December 2016. Retrieved 3 September 2017.
  2. ^ "Video of Conor McGregor Punching Old Man in Head in Whiskey Dispute". TMZ. Retrieved 2019-08-22.
  3. ^ Gaydos, Ryan (2019-08-15). "Conor McGregor seen on video punching bar patron in face over whiskey". Fox News. Retrieved 2019-08-22.
  4. ^ "Conor McGregor charged with pub assault, to appear in Dublin court next week". RT International. Retrieved 2019-10-23.
  5. ^ "UFC: McGregor charged with assault for punching elderly man". South China Morning Post. 2019-10-05. Retrieved 2019-10-23.
  6. ^ "McGregor appears in court in assault case". ESPN.com. 2019-10-11. Retrieved 2019-10-23.


Answer: The last sentence is not acceptable. It is not sourced. There is some bad writing here which does not meet WP:BLPSTYLE. For example stating that Murray 'bedded' McGregor is reminiscent of a gossip magazine. Any unsourced material must be removed per WP:GRAPEVINE.

checkY. Good. Cassiopeia talk 01:56, 29 September 2022 (UTC)


4. As per the texts below, pls explain the if the content is acceptable of inclusive and why. (please explain based on Wikipedia guidelines and name/link the guidelines in your answer)

Diana Nyad (née Sneed; born August 22, 1949) is an American author, journalist, motivational speaker, and long-distance swimmer who lives in 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW in Washington, D.C. and could be contacted at +0-202-456-6213.[1] Nyad gained national attention in 1975 when she swam around Manhattan (28 mi or 45 km) and in 1979 when she swam from North Bimini, The Bahamas, to Juno Beach, Florida (102 mi (164 km)). In 2013, on her fifth attempt and at age 64, she became the first person confirmed to swim from Cuba to Florida without the aid of a shark cage, swimming from Havana to Key West (110 mi or 180 km).[2]

References

  1. ^ Anne-Marie Garcia (September 2, 2013). "Diana Nyad completes Cuba-Florida swim". USA Today.
  2. ^ Alvarez, Lizette (September 2, 2013). "Nyad Completes Cuba-to-Florida Swim". The New York Times.


Answer: Per WP:BLPPRIVACY the article should not include details such as telephone number and address.

checkY. By the way, the address and tel belong to the White House. Cassiopeia talk 01:56, 29 September 2022 (UTC)


Images copyright[edit]

Please read Wikipedia:Image use policy and Wikipedia:Public domain image resources. Please answer the questions below and (1) with explanation based on Wikipedia guidelines and (2) provide the guidelines/links in your answer.


5. Could this image-1 be uploaded into C:Main Page and used in Wikipedia? and Why.

Answer- Explanation: Yes as this is a public domain image.

Answer - link/guideline: WP:PD US government works are not eligible for copyright protection.

checkY. Cassiopeia talk 01:56, 29 September 2022 (UTC)


6. Could this image-2 be uploaded into C:Main Page and used in Wikipedia? and Why.

Answer- Explanation: Yes, this is a public domain image. The source and original post can be checked to confirm. Answer - link/guideline: WP:PD

checkY. We also always need to check the "original site" (the original source) that the image is in PD (public domain). If we click on the flickr link provided on the right of the image it will take your to [3] where it was uploaded by the owner and stated public domain (PD) there. Cassiopeia talk 01:56, 29 September 2022 (UTC)


7. Could this image-3 be uploaded into C:Main Page and used in Wikipedia?

Answer- Explanation: Yes, as the creator has made it available under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication


Answer - link/guideline: WP:IUPC under free licenses. Originally posted on Pixabay, reviewed and available on Commons.

checkY. Again we need to check the original source as not all the images are free use claimed by the editor who uploaded the images that the images were taken by them and agree to released the right or the upload the photo is a PD. If we follow the link (source) from Wikimdeia here - Pixabay and it is stated "Free for commercial use" and also on Wikimedia it is verify by reviewer. Cassiopeia talk 01:56, 29 September 2022 (UTC)


8. Could this image-4 be uploaded into C:Main Page and used in Wikipedia? and Why.

Answer- Explanation: I don't think so. This is a commercial product and likely to be copyright protected.


Answer - link/guideline: WP:IUPC under non-free images.

checkY. One way we could check it to download the image to our computer and use Tineye] where you might able to find some reverse images on the internet.


Neutral point of view[edit]

P;lease read WP:NPOV and MOS:PUFF. Point out the WP:NPOV words/pharses and rewrite the paragraph on Question 9& 10 from a neutral point of view.

9. She is a brilliant boxer with a rare and exceptional beauty. She turned Pro at the age of 19 after winning one amateur fight on December 14, 2013 where she destroyed her opponent in 20 seconds. Her talent and marketability made her a fighter to watch right out the gate and she fought under XXX promotion on her next fight on February 2014.

Answer: She turned pro at the age of 19 after winning one amateur fight, in which she defeated her opponent in 20 seconds. She fought under XXX promotion for her next fight on February 2014.

checkY. Removing: brilliant, rare and exceptional beauty, destroyed, talent and marketability, to watch right out the gate. Cassiopeia talk 01:56, 29 September 2022 (UTC)


10. He is a popular, acclaimed Bulgarian actor, who loves by all who have watched his films. He was born in Veliko Tarnovo and started working in the film industry since he was at the tender, innocent of the age of 14 and he has featured in 44 films.

Answer: He is a Bulgarian actor. He was born in Veliko Tarnovo and started working in the film industry when he was 14. He has featured in 44 films.

checkY. Removing: popular, acclaimed, loves by all who have watched his films, tender, innocent. Cassiopeia talk 01:56, 29 September 2022 (UTC)


11. Please read WP:DUE and in your own words, please explain why it is important to provide balance and due weight content in an article.

Answer: As Wikipedia is a neutral encyclopedia, all significant viewpoints which can be found in reliable sources should be given equal weight, depending on their respective prominence in sources.

checkY. Take Capital punishment article for example - it provides a balance and due weight content, representing all mainstream points of view in reliable sources. 01:56, 29 September 2022 (UTC)


No original research[edit]

Please read WP:OR and WP:NOT and answer the questions below
12. In your own words, why Wikipedia is not a platform to publish original research?

Answer: Because all content in Wikipedia must be supported by independent, reliable sources which contain significant coverage of the subject. Original research, even if it is significant and 'true', will not have reliable sources supporting it (yet).

checkY. 01:56, 29 September 2022 (UTC)



13. In your own words, please provide one example with explanation when it is appropriate to insert an original research or an opinion in an article.

Answer: The opinion of a music critic about an opera, for example, can be quoted to show the reception that the opera received. This must be quoted properly with correct punctuation and citation.

{{yellow tick}. We could use exact words from the source in the article when (1) it is a public domain sites (2) the author/site has released their copyright and anyone to use the content/image such as " agree to irrevocably agree to release content/image under the CC BY-SA 3.0 License and the GFDL or under the Creative Commons license. (3) a direct quote and provide the source. Example Constitution of the United States and in Robert Whittaker (fighter) page (see below direct quote). Cassiopeia talk 01:56, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

In an interview with GQ Australia, he stated:

I am immensely proud to be an Australian and to be a pioneer in the sport to, you know, lead, lead today's MMA scene against all these other countries, you know, it really, it really does light me up, to see that the Australian flag when I walk out, you know, to hear them called out that I'm Australian and I am very patriotic. I am really proud of my country and proud of where I am from.[1]

References

  1. ^ GQ Australia (15 April 2016), Rob Whittaker: Modern Day Gladiator| GQ UFC197, retrieved 20 July 2017


14. See this video and write the content in the in an article by using the video info as the source.

Answer: Shady Alsuleiman taught that 'Islam commands us that our clothing, for both man and woman, must be baggy and loose'.

checkY. We can also place the info in a quote as below: Cassiopeia talk 01:56, 29 September 2022 (UTC)


References

  1. ^ Is it allowed for women to wear jeans and trousers? - Q&A - Sh. Shady Alsuleiman, retrieved 2019-10-25


Verifiability[edit]

Please read WP:V and answer the questions below
15. If the subject has two sons and it is supported by three independent, reliable sources but in reality he has 3 sons. Could we change the content from "2" sons to "3 sons"? and why?

Answer: No, because all information must be verifiable. If I know the subject has three sons, but there is no way for me to verify this with a good source or two, I can't add it to Wikipedia. Knowledge is not sufficient in itself.

checkY. Good. Wikipedia is all about verifiability from independent reliable sources. We correct the content when the source corrected itself (same source or other sources). - also see Wikipedia:But it's true. Cassiopeia talk 01:56, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
JohnmgKing See assignment 3 above. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia talk 08:34, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
Cassiopeia I have finished this section now. Thank you!JohnmgKing (talk) 08:57, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
JohnmgKing See above comments. Let me know if you have any questions or you are ready to move on to the next assignment. Cassiopeia talk 01:56, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
Cassiopeia Thanks for the feedback. I am ready to move on to the next assignment.JohnmgKing (talk) 12:04, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

Filtering - Criteria for speedy deletion[edit]

PART 2

We have looked at the requirements needed for a page to meet notable, policy and type of sources to merit a page in Wikipedia in Part 1 (Assignment 1, 2 & 3). In assignment 4, we look at what type of articles need to be filtered out from our system when reviewing a page. There are many criteria of WP:Criteria for speedy deletion. Here we discuss (1) General criteria (G1-G14), (2) Article criteria (A1-A11) and R2.
Please do the following
  1. Pls set up your CSD log by installing MYCSD so I could review your CSD nomination. After saving, you have to bypass your browser's cache to see the changes - see instruction at Wikipedia:Bypass your cache.
  2. Bookmark Earwig's Copyvio Detector in computer; and install Earwig Copyvio Detector script. (The "copyvio" will appear on the left panel under "Tools" section on every page in Wikipedia.
  3. Install CV-revdel and after saving, you have to bypass your browser's cache to see the changes - see instruction at Wikipedia:Bypass your cache.

General criteria[edit]

1. Please (G1-G14) at General and answer the following questions in your own words.


No Criterion Application Comment by Cass
1 G1 G1 can be used for articles containing content which is simply meaningless, random gibberish, this content is never going to be encyclopedic so the pages are deleted. checkY. Cassiopeia talk 00:27, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
2 G2 G2 can be used for articles which have been created to test some function of Wikipedia editing. Sometimes editors may forget to use their user space for this and instead use main space. checkY. Cassiopeia talk 00:27, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
3 G3 G3 can be used for articles which contain false, misleading information which is intended to mislead the reader. This is also for pages which are created purely for vandalism, or page moves done in the same spirit. checkY. Cassiopeia talk 00:27, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
4 G4 G4 can be used for articles which were reposted after a deletion discussion like an AFD. This could be by someone involved in the deletion discussed who supporting keeping the page, but not necessarily. The article needs to be similar to the state it was in when the deletion discussion occurred. checkY. Cassiopeia talk 00:27, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
5 G5 G5 can be used for articles which were created by a user who was banned or blocked. This can be a topic ban or full block, but it only covers articles created when the ban was active. checkY. Cassiopeia talk 00:27, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
6 G6 G6 can be used for technical deletions which occur for reasons of maintenance. checkY. Cassiopeia talk 00:27, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
7 G7 G7 can be used when an editor requests deletion of an article which only they have worked on. checkY. Cassiopeia talk 00:27, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
8 G8 G8 can be used to delete pages which relied on another page for their existence. For example talk pages to deleted articles and redirects with no target. checkY. Cassiopeia talk 00:27, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
9 G9 G9 is for the Wikimedia Foundation to exercise their unlimited power. checkY. Cassiopeia talk 00:27, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
10 G10 G10 is to enable the deletion of pages which are used to attack, harass, intimidate, etc. For example, a BLP which criticises the subject with a hostile tone and makes no effort to be encyclopedic.. checkY. Cassiopeia talk 00:27, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
11 G11 G11 is used to delete articles which are used for advertising and spam. It must be non-neutral. checkY. Cassiopeia talk 00:27, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
12 G12 G12 is used for obvious cases of copyright infringement. checkY. Cassiopeia talk 00:27, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
13 G13 G13 is used to delete drafts which have been abandoned. checkY. Cassiopeia talk 00:27, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
14 G14 G14 is used to delete useless disambiguation pages. checkY. Cassiopeia talk 00:27, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

Article and R2 criteria[edit]

1. Please (A1-A11) criteria at WP:CSD#List of criteria and answer the following questions in your own words.


No Criterion Application Comment by Cass
1 A1 A1 is used for articles which do not have a subject which can be identified from the content. checkY. Cassiopeia talk 00:27, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
2 A2 A2 is used for foreign language articles which exist elsewhere. For example, if someone copies a page from the German Wikipedia, without translating it, it can be deleted via A2. checkY. Cassiopeia talk 00:27, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
3 A3 A3 is used for pages with no content. checkY. Cassiopeia talk 00:27, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
4 A5 A5 is for articles which have been identified as being more suited to being hosted at another Wiki project. For example, a dictionary definition of a word is best suited to Wikictionary rather than Wikipedia. checkY. Cassiopeia talk 00:27, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
5 A7 A7 is for articles which have no claim of importance, where the article does not demonstrate why the subject could be notable. Specifically this is for articles about people, animals, organizations, web content and events. checkY. Cassiopeia talk 00:27, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
6 A9 A9 is for articles about musical recordings which have no claim of importance, where the articles does not demonstrate why the subject could be notable. checkY. Cassiopeia talk 00:27, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
7 A10 A10 is for articles which duplicate an existing article, and do not improve on the existing article. checkY. Cassiopeia talk 00:27, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
8 A11 A11 is for articles which are about subjects which were invented by the article's creator or by someone known to them. There must be no significant claim of importance. checkY. Cassiopeia talk 00:27, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
9 R2 R2 is for redirects which go from mainspace into a different namespace. Except Category:, Template:, Wikipedia:, Help: and Portal:. checkY. Cassiopeia talk 00:27, 9 February 2024 (UTC)



3. Please read WP:PROMOTION and WP:G11 and provide 5 successful CSD 11 articles you have nominated from Special:NewPagesFeed (New Page Patrol or Article for Creation section). Pls provide the article names and hist diffs and I will check them at your CSD log.

Answer i:

Draft:Mohamed Benchellal checkY. Cassiopeia talk 00:27, 9 February 2024 (UTC)


Answer ii:

Draft:Pasarlapati Srinivasa Bangaraiah Sarma checkY. Cassiopeia talk 00:27, 9 February 2024 (UTC)


Answer iii:

Draft:Game TopN : Popular Mobile Games,Online Games Sites

checkY. Cassiopeia talk 00:27, 9 February 2024 (UTC)


Answer iv:

Draft:Dhiyaa saad checkY. Cassiopeia talk 00:27, 9 February 2024 (UTC)


Answer v:

Draft:Hilditch & Key - Jermyn Street

checkY. Cassiopeia talk 00:27, 9 February 2024 (UTC)


Pls read WP:COPYVIO, WP:REVDEL, WP:COPYPASTE, WP:DCM and WP:G12 and answer the questions below.
3. When do we nominated a page for WP:G12 and when do we WP:REVDEL the COPYVIO text?

Answer: When the whole article is based on copyvio content and there is no way to redeem the article, we can G12. To remove the text from public view we can use REVDEL, where there is no attribution to sourcing.

checkY. Also we do a G12 when a big chunk of the content is in violation of copyvio. Cassiopeia talk 00:27, 9 February 2024 (UTC)



4. What constitute copyright infringement/violation.

Answer: Copying work without the express permission of the copyright holder. checkY. Copyright violation is: text copied from the sources that are not public domain or without permission or copyright holder, close paraphrasing. For images - if the image fails to comply with one of the free licences listed by Wikipedia - it constitutes copyright violation. Cassiopeia talk 00:27, 9 February 2024 (UTC)



5. Why some of the texts found in an article are identical as per its sources and yet they are not considered copyright violation? Please provide three examples.

Answer i: We could reproduce the entire Diary of Samuel Pepys if we wanted to, since it is in the public domain.


Answer ii: If the content is directly quoted and attributed in reasonably small quotations, this is likely to be a fair use.


Answer iii: When the copyright has been waived via a license.


6. Why copyright violation needs to be stamped out from Wikipedia and who determined when a violation is lawfully taking place?

Answer: Because there are legal consequences. And the legal authorities determine the violation.

7. Pls read WP:COPYVIO, WP:REVDEL, WP:COPYPASTE, WP:DCM and WP:G12 and provide 5 successful CSD 12 articles you have nominated from Special:NewPagesFeed (New Page Patrol or Article for Creation section). Pls provide the article names and I will check them at your CSD log. You can use Earwig's Copyvio Detector tool to check if an article is in violation of COPYVIO.


Answer i:

Draft:Hilditch & Key - Jermyn Street


Answer ii: Draft:GarbhaGudi IVF Centre


Answer iii: Draft:North Base UK


Answer iv: Draft:Androgen independent


Answer v: Draft:Bilawal Ali Ceo & Founder at Assignment Xperts (PVT) LTD: '

8. Pls provide 5 successful CSD in any criteria except WP:G11, WP:G12 and WP:G13 articles you have nominated from Special:NewPagesFeed (New Page Patrol "ONLY"). Pls provide the article names and I will check them at your CSD log.

Answer i:

This attack page: CSD G10 ({{db-attack}}); notified Heromixhackx (talk · contribs) 09:49, 18 October 2022 (UTC)


Answer ii:

Orange Gang Family: CSD A10


Answer iii:

Liberian music producer and celebrity: CSD A7


Answer iv:

Chum Ehelepola: CSD A3


Answer v:

The Bliss (band) CSD A7


9. Pls read WP:R2 and WP:NPPDRAFT. Please explain when to a new page (NPP article) can be nominated for CSD R2 and what should be considered when doing such move?

Answer:

This can be done when redirects which go to a namespace that isn't Category:, Template:, Wikipedia:, Help: or Portal:



10. Pls read and A1-A11 at WP:CSD and and provide 5 successful "Article CSD" articles (with at least two of them are CSD A7) you have nominated from Special:NewPagesFeed (New Page Patrol "ONLY").Pls provide the article names and I will check them at your CSD log.


Answer i CSD A7:

Liberian music producer and celebrity: CSD A7


Answer ii CSD A7:


The Bliss (band) CSD A7


Answer v any criteria:

Orange Gang Family: CSD A10


Copyright violation and paid editors[edit]

Pls read WP:COI and WP:PAID and answer the following question
11. How do we spot a COI/PAID editor?

Answer:

COI editors are often SPA editors who are not otherwise active on Wikipedia. This can often be seen in the poor quality of their edits. SPA editors who are editing about something they are personally connected to will often entirely ignore WP:NPOV and show their personal feelings on subjects. On the other hand, some COI editors are there to push their own opinions on politics, religion etc. These editors can be more skilled and try to hide the POV pushing, but can usually be spotted over the long term by their pattern of edits in specific areas.


12. What you should do when you review an NPP article and notice the creator is a COI editor?

Answer:

Add COI tag to the article. Post COI welcome template to the user page. Add to WP:COIN if usual talk page resolution fails.


13. Please read WP:PAID. What you should do when you review an NPP article and notice the creator is a paid editor?

Answer:

Add COI tag, post 'paid' welcome template to the user page.

JohnmgKing sorry for the late reply as I was away for several days. See assignment 4 above. Note: Assingment 4 and 5 are the hardest assignment in this program, so do take your time and let me know if you need any help. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia talk 06:50, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Cassiopeia Hi there. I have been looking out for articles to nominate for G11, but the unreviewed backlog is quite low at the moment, and I want to be careful that I am nominating them correctly and not just doing it hoping to get my quota for this project. So I guess it may take some time. I also feel a bit nervous about using any of the general CSD tags on AFC submissions, because I haven't done any AFC work before. If you have any advice that would be useful. Thanks!JohnmgKing (talk) 09:47, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
JohnmgKing You can use either new page or article for creation (AfC/draft) for G11 and G12. There are many G11 and G12 article in AfC submission - see New Pages Feed and click "Article for Creation" on the grey panel at the top of the page for AfC submission pages. Cassiopeia talk 01:50, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Cassiopeia Just a note to say that I haven't forgotten about this. I'm still working on the CSD side, learning each of the criteria carefully. May take some time. JohnmgKing (talk) 16:38, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
JohnmgKing Ok. thank you for letting me know. You take care. Cassiopeia talk 23:49, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
Cassiopeia Hi there. I have read about CSD R2, but I am not sure where I can find articles to nominate. Most of the R2 nominations I have seen were people draftifying articles and then deleting the redirects to draft space.JohnmgKing (talk) 10:51, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
JohnmgKing you can ignore the R2 questions as most NPPS participants find it hard to understand and find article for nomination. The R2 on this program was designed so that the participants know how to do it instead of draftifiying the draft and once gain a lot of R2 nomination approval the participants/editor could have apply for certain user right. When you have finished answering the remaining questions then ping me. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia talk 22:56, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Cassiopeia Hi! Just to let you know, I changed my username. Do we need to change the name of this page? I think I am finished now, let me know if you see anything is missing.Heavy Grasshopper (talk) 15:20, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Cassiopeia/NPPS/Heavy_Grasshopper&oldid=1205149741"