User:Boguslavmandzyuk/Sandbox

This is a Wikipedia user page.
This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user in whose space this page is located may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Boguslavmandzyuk/Sandbox.

My Sandboxes

Good Article Criteria
A good article has the following attributes:

It is well written. In this respect:
(a) the prose is clear and the grammar is correct; and

(b) it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, jargon, words to avoid, fiction, and list incorporation.^[1]
It is factually accurate and verifiable. In this respect, it:
(a) provides references to all sources of information, and at minimum contains a section dedicated to the attribution of those sources in accordance with the guide to layout;^[2]

(b) at minimum, provides in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons;^[2] and

(c) contains no original research.
It is broad in its coverage. In this respect, it:
(a) addresses the major aspects of the topic;^[3] and

(b) stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary details (see summary style).
It is neutral; that is, it represents viewpoints fairly and without bias.
It is stable; that is, it does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of an ongoing edit war. Vandalism reversions, proposals to split or merge content, and improvements based on reviewers' suggestions do not apply.^[4]
It is illustrated, where possible and appropriate, by images.^[5] In this respect:
(a) all images used are tagged with their copyright status, and fair use rationales are provided for any non-free content; and

(b) the images are appropriate to the topic, and have suitable captions.^[6]

References

^ It is strongly recommended that the entire Manual of Style is followed, at least in general terms, but this is not a requirement for Good articles.
^ ^a ^b Where in-line citations are provided, they should give proper attribution using either Harvard references or the cite.php footnotes method, but not both in the same article. Science-based articles should follow the Scientific citation guidelines.
^ This requirement is significantly weaker than the "comprehensiveness" required by WP:FAC; it allows shorter articles, articles that do not necessarily outline every part of the topic, and broad overviews of large topics to be listed.
^ Nominations for articles that are unstable because of constructive editing should be placed on hold.
^ Other media, such as video and sound clips, are also covered by this criterion.
^ The presence of images is not, in itself, a requirement for Good articles. However, if images (including other media) with acceptable copyright status are appropriate and readily available, then they should be used.

Make

Ukrainian composers from here: [1]
Bandurist from here: [2]
Yury Mayboroda
Platon Mayboroda

Khotyn[edit]

Constructions[edit]

links[edit]

Використані матеріали з http://www.serg-klymenko.narod.ru/Other_World/Ukraine.PivdenZahid_4.htm

[1] It is strongly recommended that the entire Manual of Style is followed, at least in general terms, but this is not a requirement for Good articles.

[Harvard_and_cite.php-2] Where in-line citations are provided, they should give proper attribution using either Harvard references or the cite.php footnotes method, but not both in the same article. Science-based articles should follow the Scientific citation guidelines.

[3] This requirement is significantly weaker than the "comprehensiveness" required by WP:FAC; it allows shorter articles, articles that do not necessarily outline every part of the topic, and broad overviews of large topics to be listed.

[4] Nominations for articles that are unstable because of constructive editing should be placed on hold.

[5] Other media, such as video and sound clips, are also covered by this criterion.

[6] The presence of images is not, in itself, a requirement for Good articles. However, if images (including other media) with acceptable copyright status are appropriate and readily available, then they should be used.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]