User:Antidiskriminator/Sandbox

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
User:Antidiskriminator User talk:Antidiskriminator Special:Emailuser/Antidiskriminator User:Antidiskriminator/Articles User:Antidiskriminator/Sources User:Antidiskriminator/Sandbox User:Antidiskriminator/Awards
Userpage Talk page E-mail

(opened once per year)

Articles Sources Gallery Sandbox Awards


  • Filipović, Gordana (1989). Kosovo--past and present. Review of International Affairs. p. 222. The Cominform emigres from Kosovo soon formed a nucleus in Albania which operated against Yugoslavia, using various means and methods; they caused disturbances in ... The Albanian intelligence service (Sigurimi) used them for illegal infiltration into Kosovo

Talkpage template[edit]

Short description Opinion Basis
Antidiskriminator's opinion/reply about/to xzy .... I think that xyz...... because........ so the text should be changed to ............... * List of wikipedia policies (with quotes if necessary) that support the opinion. or
* List of sources that support the opinion (if necessary with short quotes)
....... ........ .............

Based on the discussion at WP:AN (permanent link), Antidiskriminator obliged himself to use this template for all comments he makes at articles' or users' talkpages in relation to s;dljfdkjfkaj topics, for at least 12 months.--~~~~

Skanderbeg's name[edit]

  1. insisting only on "names only in Turkish and Latin" because it is allowed to use (a kind of) primary sources only on Albanian or Turkish language (I will not discuss neutrality of this sources (yet)) "primary Albanian/Turskish sources, i.e. from 16th to 18th century" - insisted by Sulmues when he deleted Skanderbeg name on Serbian
  2. that I should prove that "name used in Serbian historiography was one of the predominant names used in international historiography" (ZjariRretues)
  3. "In the lede we should enter the name only if there are historical primary sources" (Sulmues)
  4. "article, poem, book.." is not suitable source (ZjariRretues)
  5. "list of names would be too long" (ZjariRretues) if I include his name on Serbian language, but it is not too long for other languages, like i.e. Turkish
  6. "but please make sure that they all are contemporary" (Sulmues)
  7. use only those characters that are used in “preponderant primary sources” (Sulmues)
  8. (associated with Albania and Albanians) (Resnjari)
  9. (read the whole article) (Resnjari)
Num Argument Weight Wikipedia policy in which is argument grounded Albanian langauge Serbian language Greek language
1
  • Argument: "names only in Turkish and Latin" because it is only allowed to use (a kind of) "primary Albanian/Turskish sources, i.e. from 16th to 18th century" - Sulmues
  • Counterargument - The same kind of argument can be invented for Serbian cyrillic and Greek script. False discriminatory argument, not grounded in wikipedia policies.
No Yes Yes Yes
2
  • Argument: "predominant names used in international historiography" - ZjariRretues
  • Counterargument - none of three language names are "predominant names used in international historiography". False argument, not grounded in wikipedia policies.
No No No No
3
  • Argument: only per "historical primary sources" (Sulmues)
  • Counterargument - if this rationale is used, only Serbian and Greek langauge names can be found in "historical primary sources".
Yes/No No Yes Yes
4 "article, poem, book.." is not suitable source (ZjariRretues) No No No No
5 "list of names would be too long" (ZjariRretues) Yes No No No
6 "but please make sure that they all are contemporary" (Sulmues) Yes Yes Yes Yes
7 use only those characters that are used in “preponderant primary sources” (Sulmues) No No No No
8 (associated with Albania and Albanians) (Resnjari) No Yes Yes Yes
9 (read the whole article) (Resnjari) No Yes Yes Yes


List of wikipedia policies that deal with alternative names in the first sentence of the lede: