User:Aiken drum/ACE2010

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  • Support Highly experienced former arbitrator. Open about past problems, and I don't think there is anything to be concerned with.
  • Oppose Too many poor admin decisions, without considering priorities.
  • Oppose Too much of a drama-mongerer (such as over the ID issue in this very election). Not arbcom material. Better suited to article work.
  • Oppose Not mature enough for this role, and not particularly active either.
  • Support Can sometimes be blunt to the point of being insulting, but this minor issue is outweighed by their content work, knowledge of the project and someone who I know will consider both sides of a conflict fairly.
  • Support I don't like this user's beliefs on inclusionism and their stances at RFA, but they have almost always impressed me with their sense, integrity and fairness.
  • Support A decent enough former arbitrator with generally good sense.
  • Neutral Never heard of.
  • Support A fine arbitrator currently; I'm happy for his continued role in this area.
  • Oppose Far too many issues (e.g. block log) to make a good arb.
  • Neutral Never heard of.
  • Oppose Only seen him in meta discussions and not generally been impressed.
  • Oppose Unfortunately Rlevse/Sherwoodgate let this candidate down with their attack on FAC. FAC isn't perfect but it was not the cause of Rleve's plagiarism.
  • Neutral Uncertain.
  • Neutral Uncertain.
  • Support Knowledgable, fair, a good listener, unbiased and experienced.