The State of Innocence

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The State of Innocence and Fall of Man: An Opera
Title page (1678 reprint)
AuthorJohn Dryden
CountryKingdom of England
LanguageEarly Modern English
GenreOpera, tragedy
Publication date
1677

The State of Innocence is a dramatic work by John Dryden, originally intended as the libretto to an opera. It was written around 1673–4,[1] and first published in 1677. The work is a rhymed adaption of John Milton's epic poem Paradise Lost, and retells the Biblical story of the fall of man.

Composition[edit]

Dryden was an admirer of Milton's, and described Paradise Lost as "one of the greatest, most noble and most sublime poems which either this Age or Nation has produc'd".[2] According to John Aubrey, Milton gave Dryden his personal permission to adapt the poem:[3]

[Dryden] went to him to have leave to put his Paradise Lost into a Drama in Rhyme. Mr. Milton received him civilly, and told him that he would give him leave to tag his verses.

This reference to the metal "tags" affixed to the ends of cords or laces may hint at Milton's contempt of rhyme as something purely fashionable and ornamental.[4]

Dryden's work, originally titled The Fall of Angels and Man in Innocence: An Heroic Opera, was completed within the space of a month,[5] but the intended opera was never produced. Unofficial transcripts of the libretto began to circulate, however, and the errors in these copies so annoyed Dryden that he was finally induced, in 1677, to publish an authorised version.[2]

Style[edit]

The State of Innocence is a five-act drama, chiefly focusing on Books 2, 4, 8 and 9 of Milton's poem.[6] The dialogue and soliloquies are written mostly in heroic couplets, although one section is written in blank verse. The opening lines, spoken by Lucifer, provide an example of Dryden's style:

Is this the seat our conqueror has given?
And this the climate we must change for heaven?
These regions and this realm my wars have got;
This mournful empire is the loser's lot;
In liquid burnings, or on dry to dwell,
Is all the sad variety of hell.

Reception[edit]

While Paradise Lost had met with a cold reception upon its first publication,[7] The State of Innocence was a great success, and was reprinted more often during Dryden's lifetime than any of his other plays.[1] A poem by Nathaniel Lee, attached to the first edition of the libretto, cast Dryden as the "mighty genius" who had refined Milton's "rough" work.[8]

Modern criticism has been less favourable, with critics disapproving of Dryden's alterations to both the literary form and the political message of Milton's poem.[9] To modern eyes, as Dustin Griffin writes, "Dryden's deviation from his original is a measure of his failure".[10]

References[edit]

Notes

  1. ^ a b Freedman 1971, p. 18.
  2. ^ a b Dryden 1677.
  3. ^ Darbishire 1965, p. 7.
  4. ^ Masson 1880, pp. 709–10.
  5. ^ Masson 1880, p. 710.
  6. ^ Frank 1993, p. 47.
  7. ^ Scott 1826, p. 154.
  8. ^ Lee 1677.
  9. ^ Frank 1993, pp. 49–50.
  10. ^ Griffin 1986, p. 147.

Sources

  • Darbishire, Helen, ed. (1965). The Early Lives of Milton. Constable and Co. p. 7.
  • Dryden, John (1677). "The Author's Apology for Heroic Poetry; and Poetic Licence". The State of Innocence. London: Harry Herringman.
  • Frank, Marcie (1993). "Staging Criticism, Staging Milton". The Eighteenth Century. 34 (1): 45–64. JSTOR 41467548.
  • Freedman, Morris (1971). "The 'Tagging' of Paradise Lost: Rhyme in Dryden's 'The State of Innocence'". Milton Quarterly. 5 (1): 18–22. JSTOR 24462555.
  • Griffin, Dustin (1986). Regaining Paradise. Cambridge University Press. pp. 144–7. ISBN 0-521-30913-1.
  • Lee, Nathaniel (1677). "To Mr. Dryden, on his Poem of Paradise". The State of Innocence. London: Harry Herringman.
  • Masson, David (1880). The Life of John Milton. Vol. 4. Macmillan and Co. pp. 708–713.
  • Scott, Walter (1826). Memoirs of John Dryden. Vol. 1. A. and W. Galignani. pp. 154–65.

Further reading

  • King, Bruce (1964). "The Significance of Dryden's State of Innocence". SEL: Studies in English Literature 1500–1900. 4 (3): 371–391. doi:10.2307/449489. JSTOR 449489.

External links[edit]