Template talk:Puget Sound Transit

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconUnited States: Washington Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This template is supported by WikiProject Washington.

WikiProject Washington[edit]

This template has been added to the Wikipedia:WikiProject Washington by me using AWB because it is in category:Washington (U.S. state) templates if you believe this to be an error just revert my addition, or you can ask me at my talk page or the WikiProject Washington Talk Page, and check that this template is not in or remove it from the Washington (U.S. state) templates category --Gold Man60 Talk

Revamp of this template[edit]

I have worked to create a new, clearer, more comprehensive version of this template. It is viewable at User:YB3/New Template:Puget Sound Transit. I support replacing the current Template:Puget Sound Transit withe the new version. Thoughts? YB3 (t) 05:33, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Seconded, I like the new version that it's organized by mode. Why is the Seattle Monorail Project listed under 'Other' as opposed to under 'Monorail'? I know the project is defunct but the text explaining the italics imply that it's still active or just 'on-hold'. I suggest putting it under 'Monorail', with or without text saying that it is defunct. Even Tacoma Streetcar is listed under 'Streetcar' although currently it's a proposal and not an actual project. Oranviri (talk) 06:06, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good point. Since I have a monorail category, it's really in the wrong place. I'll cahnge it. YB3 (t) 21:42, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've gone ahead and moved it, as we're unlikely to hear more voices here, IMO YB3 (t) 22:07, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bus rapid transit[edit]

The "Bus rapid transit" section currently contains links to Swift and RapidRide. I'm not sure about Swift, but there seems to be decent consensus that RapidRide is not BRT. I'll be moving it to the local/express bus section. Ibadibam (talk) 18:29, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]