Template talk:Infobox court case/2014 archive
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
"Number of judges" parameter no longer works
 | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Since this template was replaced with the new version, the "number of judges" parameter no longer works. Whatever value is used, the label always says "Judge(s) sitting". In the previous version it would say "Judges sitting" or "Judge sitting" depending on the parameter. I'd appreciate it if someone with the power to edit this template could fix it by changing
| label29 = Judge(s) sitting
to
| label29 = {{#if:{{{number of judges|}}} | {{#switch: {{{number of judges|}}} | 1 = Judge sitting | Judges sitting }} | Judge(s) sitting}}
- htonl (talk) 14:08, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
Not done: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{edit template-protected}}template. (s) is the standard and accepted method of doing this. Please establish a consensus if there is a specific reason that you think this template should be bloated to go against the standard practice. Your code replacement suggestion is also flawed. It should be simply:Judge{{PLURAL:{{{number of judges}}}||s}} sitting— {{U|Technical 13}} (t • e • c) 14:30, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
- The template previously had this functionality, and the recent merge was supposed to preserve the existing functionality of the template. The merge has therefore effectively changed the template without consensus. And my code replacement suggestion is simply the code that existed in this template before the merge, but of course if it can be more efficiently implemented then that's fine. - htonl (talk) 14:49, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
- I agree with Htonl. His suggested change merely re-establishes a feature that was present before the recent update. — SMUconlaw (talk) 14:59, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
Done I restored the previous behaviour, which has three possibilities: (a) |number of judges=1- use "Judge sitting"; (b)|number of judges=any other non-blank value- use "Judges sitting"; (c)|number of judges=left blank or completely absent - use "Judge(s) sitting". --Redrose64 (talk) 15:22, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
- I agree with Htonl. His suggested change merely re-establishes a feature that was present before the recent update. — SMUconlaw (talk) 14:59, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
- The template previously had this functionality, and the recent merge was supposed to preserve the existing functionality of the template. The merge has therefore effectively changed the template without consensus. And my code replacement suggestion is simply the code that existed in this template before the merge, but of course if it can be more efficiently implemented then that's fine. - htonl (talk) 14:49, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 17 April 2014
| This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Hi guys, there is a bug: if you include a picture, it used to replace the coats of arms for various courts. But since some point recently, that was changed, and now a picture does not replace the crest - see here for example Quinn or here: Salomon. A speedy change will be much appreciated. Wikidea 14:08, 17 April 2014 (UTC) Wikidea 14:08, 17 April 2014 (UTC)