This template is within the scope of WikiProject National Football League, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the NFL on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Football LeagueWikipedia:WikiProject National Football LeagueTemplate:WikiProject National Football LeagueNational Football League articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This template is within the scope of the WikiProject Cleveland, the scope of which includes Cleveland and the Greater Cleveland Area. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.ClevelandWikipedia:WikiProject ClevelandTemplate:WikiProject ClevelandCleveland articles
Bold text w/ default colors for championship years adequately communicates to readers both that the team won a championship during that season, and, perhaps more importantly, that the bolded text serves as a wikilink. H:Color cautions against changing the default wikilink colors for purely aesthetic reasons. Levdr1lp / talk 00:25, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I disagree. The reason why team colors should be used in the links for championship appearance seasons and championship victory seasons is to distinguish between what seasons a team played in a championship game (and lost) and which seasons a team won a championship game. It is absolutely not purely aesthetic. It has a function and a purpose. Charlesaaronthompson (talk) 00:40, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Bold years for championships is broadly accepted; italics for lost championships is not. Levdr1lp / talk 01:57, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
